No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Agora41 Item 32: This is the ass sucking item. Discuss yourselves.
Entered by jp2 on Tue Mar 26 21:43:55 UTC 2002:

This item text has been erased.

19 responses total.



#1 of 19 by edina on Tue Mar 26 21:48:39 2002:

This is the item where you try to prove how superior you are, obviously. 
Emmerdeur.


#2 of 19 by jp2 on Tue Mar 26 21:51:27 2002:

This response has been erased.



#3 of 19 by edina on Tue Mar 26 21:51:49 2002:

Baby - you don't even know what it means.


#4 of 19 by md on Tue Mar 26 21:54:59 2002:

Tell me about it.


#5 of 19 by other on Wed Mar 27 04:31:43 2002:

Hmmm.  Another "Jamie's inferiority complex is inflamed again" item?


#6 of 19 by clees on Wed Mar 27 07:17:35 2002:

heh


#7 of 19 by jp2 on Wed Mar 27 17:46:56 2002:

This response has been erased.



#8 of 19 by flem on Wed Mar 27 19:55:16 2002:

Maybe, but I'd do the hell out of Terri Gross (sp?).  


#9 of 19 by krj on Wed Mar 27 23:15:03 2002:

I've been a Michael Kinsley fan since the Reagan years.
I know where that lands me in Jamie's scales.
I'm curious to know what's annoying him about Kinsley this week,
though.


#10 of 19 by morwen on Wed Mar 27 23:23:44 2002:

resp:0 No me importa.  That is Spanish for "Who cares?"


#11 of 19 by oval on Wed Mar 27 23:27:23 2002:

and i have no idea how much they suck each others' asses anyway.


#12 of 19 by mcnally on Wed Mar 27 23:44:22 2002:

  re #9:  you appear to be safe.  jp2 is hacked off about someone named
  "Kingsley", not "Kinsley".  Whos "Carolyn Hax", anyway?


#13 of 19 by jp2 on Thu Mar 28 00:00:17 2002:

This response has been erased.



#14 of 19 by krj on Thu Mar 28 00:26:39 2002:

IIRC, Carolyn Hax writes a column on dating which the Ann Arbor News
picks up occasionally.  


#15 of 19 by orinoco on Thu Mar 28 15:07:50 2002:

<nods>  She's part of the New Wave or whatever of advice columns, in which
you insult the people who write you letters instead of agreeing with them.


#16 of 19 by edina on Thu Mar 28 15:44:39 2002:

Actually, you call their bluff.  Big difference.


#17 of 19 by jp2 on Thu Mar 28 16:02:17 2002:

This response has been erased.



#18 of 19 by edina on Thu Mar 28 18:42:28 2002:

I agree.


#19 of 19 by oval on Thu Mar 28 21:21:27 2002:

dan savage rocks.

Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.

No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss