|
|
Maybe its just me. But there is a situation here in my 'hood that I just simply find hilarious. A contractor was hired to build some section eight housing and somebody noticed that all the workers were white or hispanic. Well the contracter was pressured into hiring some blacks which he did all well and fine (probably had a nice enough profit margin so it didn't make him no never mind). But the local alderman got wind of this and wants the blacks to be fired. Seems the group that did the pressuring was (a certain nationally known figure's I understand) not the alderman's and so wants this group's blacks to be fired and the alderman's blacks to be hired instead. One group of blacks losing their jobs over affirmative action in the favor of another group of blacks.
13 responses total.
Politicking as usual.
re0: 8D
Put the alderman up against a wall and let the guys he wants fired have at him with whipped cream and cooked spaghetti.
The perversion of affirmative action sounds like at most a side issue here. It sounds far more like an issue of political patronage, taken to an extreme.
Sounds like what I would consider a stereotype of Chicago politics.
When I lived in Chicago, many people seemed to think that affirmative action was used as an excuse for patronage pretty often. I never payed enough attention to have an opinion on it, but I can't say this surprises me much.
Here's an interesting question: Chicago government is highly corrupt, but stuff gets done. Detroit government is highly corrupt, but nothing gets done. What's the difference? If we can't clean up Detroit's government, can we at least get it to be Chicago-style corrupt instead so that stuff actually gets fixed?
how's da mob operate in Detroit?
I think we could clean up Detroit with a serious effort to find the corrupt officials and functionaries, send some to jail and fire the rest. That would at least offer some hope.
Like in any urban area, someone equally corrupt would just spring up to fill the void.
I imagine being a corrupt official in Detroit is less profitable than being one in Chicago. Probably less gratifying too, since there's less power involved. Could it be that Detroit's corrupt officials just aren't as good at it?
I suspect there's little mob involvement in the corruption in Detroit. The mob folks have been at it long enough to make it work, while the Detroit folks are the nouveau mal. Well, for the last thirty five years or so, anyway.
I suppose it those that are not corrupt may on the whole become demoralized faster in Detroit than in Chicago? With less resources, lower pay and slower rates of development, I could see why that may be a factor.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss