|
|
Recently there have been some media mutterings about the amount of money that some corporations receive from various government agencies and government funded NGOs. Some mention of situations where corporation person is on board of NGO who then grants corporation loan to buy oil from itself or things like that. Other case where corporation E obtains 'development' loan to set up factory in 'developing' nation to buy product from corporations B and S to then sell output back to B and S transported by E - not to mention any specifics... In theory a pretty fair dinkum deal, benefits the shareholders of B, E, and S and in theory profit from such a venture flows back into the corporations which distribute those profits, which are taxed by the government. back to the shareholders in the form of dividends which are then taxed again by the government, who is supposed to oversee such dealings and operations, and everybody is happy, right? Oh, and B,E,&S all contribute huge amounts of money to political campaigns of politicians they like - but thats not a problem because those donations are 'tax deductible'. And those politicians wouldn't think of doing anything so crass as to vote on tax and other laws in such a way that benefits those corporations who like them and give them money, right? Those corporations wouldn't also have 'lobbyists' who they pay (its ok, its 'tax deductible') to help the 'governors' govern would they? And then when the whole house of cards comes tumbling down from time to time as it inevitably must, its the 'evil corporations' who are at fault- not playing 'fair'. (Perhaps along with 'those' politicians, you know, the one's who aren't in the party who you like.) 'We need more laws' becomes the 'sanctimonetious' cry of the politicians (who have been passing laws right and left all along and who have been receiving money from those corporations regardless of party - yes it is the rare corporation that doesn't contribute generally the same to both parties). But your elected officials can't complain too hard and too long because there is also 'B,E,&S's whose product is tax payer money 'output' back into those 'developing nations' called 'districts' who's 'profit' is to the official who buys the votes of citizens with their own money. Its a giant Ponzi scheme paid for by you. Its your fault.
5 responses total.
That was quite an *orgy* of unnecessary quotation marks at the end there. Anyway, you need to accept that fact that when people don't understand you it isn't because they're stupid or undereducated, it's because you don't write well. That is, unless you're doing it on purpose -- i.e., deliberately stretching a one-paragraph idea into a long rambling discursive jumble, for what reason you know best.
You read to the end?
Perhaps it would help to use a few short paragraphs with the first sentence of each indicating what follows? I also find bdh's postings hard to read through. (Not that mine are a model of clarity).
Perhaps it would help to grex when sober? (whoops, that slipped out.)
i hate grexing while UNsober .. like right now.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss