No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Agora41 Item 151: M-Net/Grex Celebrity Roast
Entered by jp2 on Fri May 3 02:04:02 UTC 2002:

This item text has been erased.

34 responses total.



#1 of 34 by mynxcat on Fri May 3 03:00:04 2002:

This response has been erased.



#2 of 34 by jp2 on Fri May 3 03:06:38 2002:

This response has been erased.



#3 of 34 by senna on Fri May 3 03:32:43 2002:

Not necessarily.  You'd  be surprised how much flavor you can bring out in
a frying pan.


#4 of 34 by jp2 on Fri May 3 03:35:06 2002:

This response has been erased.



#5 of 34 by gull on Fri May 3 03:49:56 2002:

Is it really roasted, or is it baked? ;)


#6 of 34 by glenda on Fri May 3 04:11:55 2002:

Half baked         :-)


#7 of 34 by md on Fri May 3 11:10:07 2002:

Jamie eats brown rice!  Fucken hippie.


#8 of 34 by edina on Fri May 3 13:38:02 2002:

Nah - he was attempting to schtup a hippy and wanted to impress.


#9 of 34 by jp2 on Fri May 3 13:53:50 2002:

This response has been erased.



#10 of 34 by md on Fri May 3 14:32:02 2002:

Probably not, in fact.  If making brown rice is the best you can do to 
impress a woman, you need a makeover or something.  I still think 
you're secretly a hippie and accidently let the brown rice thing slip.  
Do you burn patchouli incense, too?


#11 of 34 by jp2 on Fri May 3 17:47:17 2002:

This response has been erased.



#12 of 34 by md on Fri May 3 18:54:17 2002:

Omigod, he does!  He's sitting in a cloud of patchouli smoke right 
now.  Strawberry Alarm Clock on the stereo?


#13 of 34 by jp2 on Fri May 3 22:06:50 2002:

This response has been erased.



#14 of 34 by edina on Sat May 4 17:15:03 2002:

Ok - let me assure the group - Jamie is NOT a hippie.


#15 of 34 by md on Sat May 4 18:03:38 2002:

Does he wear one of those beaded headbands and a fringed vest?


#16 of 34 by jp2 on Sat May 4 19:25:06 2002:

This response has been erased.



#17 of 34 by jaklumen on Sun May 5 11:19:53 2002:

hehe, so we are roasting Jamie, apparently.. so when do we begin to 
roast John Remmers?

*shrug* =)


#18 of 34 by md on Sun May 5 21:28:11 2002:

Because John Remmers is a Harvard-educated gentleman who has read 
everything and writes beautifully, is a gifted musician, is unfailingly 
kind to others, has done something important and beneficial with his 
life, and looks like the Grail Knight from Indiana Jones and the Last 
Crusade.  Jamie, on the other hand...


#19 of 34 by oval on Sun May 5 21:32:49 2002:

i wonder would remmers also taste better when roasted. my friend bought a
salmon that was "guaranteed haapy" (before it got killed i assume) and that
was supposed to mean it would be tastier.



#20 of 34 by orinoco on Sun May 5 22:05:05 2002:

Jamie is already a bitter little man, and I suspect that roasting would only
bring out that bitterness.  Remmers, on the other hand, is quite sweet, and
would brown nicely, although the burnt sugar would be hell to get off the pan
afterwards.  Perhaps we should grill him instead?


#21 of 34 by md on Sun May 5 22:06:54 2002:

"Guaranteed happy"!?!?  I loves it, I do!  


#22 of 34 by jp2 on Sun May 5 22:15:17 2002:

This response has been erased.



#23 of 34 by scott on Mon May 6 00:20:34 2002:

I dunno.  Remmers is active and lean, while I don't have a picture or
description of Jamie.  Jamie might be well-fed and sedentary, leading to
well-marbled flesh like in a feed-lot cow.  


#24 of 34 by jp2 on Mon May 6 00:47:37 2002:

This response has been erased.



#25 of 34 by glenda on Mon May 6 01:14:35 2002:

Remmers is a bit older as well.  Would probably be better stewed rather than
roasted.


#26 of 34 by senna on Mon May 6 01:30:42 2002:

Honestly, I was thinking about fondue for John, but I'm not planning on
preparing him for a couple of years.


#27 of 34 by oval on Mon May 6 03:47:26 2002:

but if i'm stranded out somewhere with no food and only two rabbits, which one
do i want to cook - the sweet one that hangs out with me in my lean-to and
sings little wabbit tunes, or the angry one that shows up every once in a
while and poops everywhere.



#28 of 34 by jazz on Mon May 6 04:05:42 2002:

        You're one to talk about pooping on the carpet.


#29 of 34 by jp2 on Mon May 6 04:17:44 2002:

This response has been erased.



#30 of 34 by mcnally on Mon May 6 05:59:35 2002:

  re #29:  Ick.  Even if you're volunteering, I *REALLY* doubt Remmers wants
  to participate in a Jamie / Remmers crossbreeding project.  And I'm positive
  that Mary will have something to say about this, too..


#31 of 34 by jaklumen on Mon May 6 09:25:51 2002:

no no no.. read resp:17 again.  I said *when*, not *why*.  *When*!  
Get it straight!  I never said anything about why don't we roast 
remmers.. I asked when it would begin.

sheesh, and people jump all over me when I don't read posts 
carefully ;)


#32 of 34 by jp2 on Mon May 6 14:57:28 2002:

This response has been erased.



#33 of 34 by jazz on Tue May 7 18:30:07 2002:

        I'd like to retract my earlier statements about the normality and moral
acceptability of transgenic research.  It's evil.  Evil.  Evil.


#34 of 34 by oval on Tue May 7 19:33:26 2002:

i have a feeling my 2 gay wabbits wouldn't make babies. dumbass.

Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.

No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss