|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 133 responses total. |
tod
|
|
response 98 of 133:
| 
Feb 23 06:55 UTC 2006 |
re #96
You mean abortions available at ATMs and online? AWESOME! *thumbs up*
|
jep
|
|
response 99 of 133:
|
Feb 23 13:46 UTC 2006 |
South Dakota is on the verge of passing a bill to ban almost all
abortion in the state. The lone exception is for cases when the
mother's life is in danger.
Planned Parenthood has promised a lawsuit if the bill is passed and
signed by the governor.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 100 of 133:
|
Feb 23 15:32 UTC 2006 |
Which is what the people behind the law want- they are hoping to take it
to the Supreme Court with the goal of having Roe v. Wade essentially
overturned.
|
jep
|
|
response 101 of 133:
|
Feb 23 16:19 UTC 2006 |
Yep.
They ought to wait to see if Bush gets to appoint another justice. It
doesn't look too likely to me that the current Supreme Court is going
to reverse Roe vs. Wade.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 102 of 133:
|
Feb 23 16:30 UTC 2006 |
I honestly hope they don't. That particular law doesn't even provide
exceptions for a woman who was raped.
|
sholmes
|
|
response 103 of 133:
|
Feb 23 16:33 UTC 2006 |
will it bring in new business where you can bribe docs to certify that the
mothers life was in danger ?
|
keesan
|
|
response 104 of 133:
|
Feb 23 16:58 UTC 2006 |
If that passes South Dakota is likely to lose rather than gain population as
most people move somewhere else.
|
marcvh
|
|
response 105 of 133:
|
Feb 23 17:21 UTC 2006 |
I find it very unlikely that more than 50% of the population of SD will
move away. SD already has an abortion rate much lower than the national
average, and already has very few (2 last I looked) providers of
abortion services. Under this law they would just have to drive further,
to Fargo or Minneapolis.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 106 of 133:
|
Feb 23 17:30 UTC 2006 |
re #104, 105: 50%? I find it pretty unlikely that more than .50%
of South Dakotans would move out of the state because of such a law.
|
tod
|
|
response 107 of 133:
|
Feb 23 17:36 UTC 2006 |
Would anyone move out of the USA if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade?
|
mcnally
|
|
response 108 of 133:
|
Feb 23 17:44 UTC 2006 |
I'm still hoping for Alec Baldwin to make good on previous pledges..
|
happyboy
|
|
response 109 of 133:
|
Feb 23 17:52 UTC 2006 |
re107: yes. i will not raise my daughter in
a country where her reproductive rights
are dictated by a bunch of socially retarded
characters straight out of "A Handmaid's Tale."
if anyone really thinks that these dominionist
types are gonna stop at abortions they are mistaken.
shit they are opposed to the hpv vaccine fer
christsakes.
not sure where we'd go but i'm gonna update my teaching
certification just in case. tod, ever heard or world service
authority for passports?
|
nharmon
|
|
response 110 of 133:
|
Feb 23 18:01 UTC 2006 |
I hear Japan and Korea pay well for native English speakers with
teaching ability.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 111 of 133:
|
Feb 23 18:11 UTC 2006 |
yeah, but i'll bet they keep their disabled kids in
the garage...and i don't want to teach in the garage
dig?
|
nharmon
|
|
response 112 of 133:
|
Feb 23 18:16 UTC 2006 |
Hey Holm, I can dig it! So knock yourself a pro slick. Gray matter back
got perform' us' down I take TCBin, man'.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 113 of 133:
|
Feb 23 18:25 UTC 2006 |
that was pretty white.
|
tod
|
|
response 114 of 133:
|
Feb 23 18:34 UTC 2006 |
re #101
I think they will. They'll do it with bells on, even.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 115 of 133:
|
Feb 23 19:10 UTC 2006 |
resp:107 Once my husband has his nursing license- yup.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 116 of 133:
|
Feb 23 19:11 UTC 2006 |
he's going to breastfeed?
|
jadecat
|
|
response 117 of 133:
|
Feb 23 19:35 UTC 2006 |
Well, we've talked about it, and breast feeding is supposed to be better
for the baby so... ;)
|
happyboy
|
|
response 118 of 133:
|
Feb 23 19:46 UTC 2006 |
well have him trim those areolas, or the baby might gag.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 119 of 133:
|
Feb 23 20:21 UTC 2006 |
Oh yeah... good point. Although baby animals manage.
|
naftee
|
|
response 120 of 133:
|
Feb 23 21:52 UTC 2006 |
re 113
this is why nate should never freestyle :(
|
nharmon
|
|
response 121 of 133:
|
Feb 23 22:39 UTC 2006 |
Freestyle?
|
happyboy
|
|
response 122 of 133:
|
Feb 23 23:05 UTC 2006 |
nate is into freestyle hairynipple breastfeeding?!
|