|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 1000 responses total. |
rcurl
|
|
response 975 of 1000:
| 
Oct 21 07:05 UTC 1993 |
super
|
remmers
|
|
response 976 of 1000:
|
Oct 21 08:06 UTC 1993 |
cacti
|
chelsea
|
|
response 977 of 1000:
|
Oct 21 11:36 UTC 1993 |
fours
|
katie
|
|
response 978 of 1000:
|
Oct 21 18:24 UTC 1993 |
great 0
super 0
cacti 0
fours 1
|
aa8ij
|
|
response 979 of 1000:
|
Oct 21 20:50 UTC 1993 |
chill
|
chelsea
|
|
response 980 of 1000:
|
Oct 21 22:54 UTC 1993 |
flour
|
srw
|
|
response 981 of 1000:
|
Oct 22 00:13 UTC 1993 |
inane
|
rcurl
|
|
response 982 of 1000:
|
Oct 22 04:07 UTC 1993 |
besom
|
katie
|
|
response 983 of 1000:
|
Oct 22 15:26 UTC 1993 |
chill 0
flour 1
inane 1
besom 1
|
aa8ij
|
|
response 984 of 1000:
|
Oct 22 18:30 UTC 1993 |
crane
|
rcurl
|
|
response 985 of 1000:
|
Oct 23 05:27 UTC 1993 |
fence
|
srw
|
|
response 986 of 1000:
|
Oct 23 05:33 UTC 1993 |
alarm
|
katie
|
|
response 987 of 1000:
|
Oct 23 15:57 UTC 1993 |
crane 1
fence 1
alarm 1
|
rcurl
|
|
response 988 of 1000:
|
Oct 23 20:18 UTC 1993 |
aeons
|
aa8ij
|
|
response 989 of 1000:
|
Oct 23 20:18 UTC 1993 |
crack
|
aa8ij
|
|
response 990 of 1000:
|
Oct 23 20:19 UTC 1993 |
rcurl slipped in.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 991 of 1000:
|
Oct 23 20:39 UTC 1993 |
(Question: I've noticed frequently that users announce, as aa8ij did, that
someone had "slipped in". Apparently aa8ij and I were composing our
replies simultaneously, and I was a bit earlier in hitting return. However,
does this ever matter? I have been told while composing, that someone had
slipped in, but I never cared. Is one supposed to announce the fact?)
We are approaching the Millenium of Letter Match. A record, do I understand
correctly? What would people think of restarting the game in another
Item, when we reach the Millenium (or, until the then current game is
ended)? Is there any objection? If not, at the appropriate time, I will
enter a preamble in a new item, explaining the game briefly, referring
to the rules file, etc. What would be the most appropriate way to end
this Item? (I forget the options available to a Fairwitness - but if I
look them up, I'd still ask, what would be the best choice.)
|
chelsea
|
|
response 992 of 1000:
|
Oct 23 21:01 UTC 1993 |
Good idea, restarting in a new item. The best way to end this item
would probably be to enter a response pointing people to the new item
and then freezing this one. It would still be readable but wouldn't
leave room for folks to be confused and use both items.
|
chelsea
|
|
response 993 of 1000:
|
Oct 23 21:35 UTC 1993 |
elude
|
remmers
|
|
response 994 of 1000:
|
Oct 24 10:51 UTC 1993 |
(Yes, I think 1000 responses will be a Grex record. Re "slipping in":
A reason to announce that somebody "slipped in" on you is to alleviate
possible confusion, e.g. if people might think you were responding to
the response that slipped in rather than some earlier response.)
|
katie
|
|
response 995 of 1000:
|
Oct 24 16:14 UTC 1993 |
aeons 5 Your turn, rane!
|
jdg
|
|
response 996 of 1000:
|
Oct 24 20:51 UTC 1993 |
I think Rane should start a new item after freezing this one, per
Mary's earlier suggestion.
|
aa8ij
|
|
response 997 of 1000:
|
Oct 24 21:01 UTC 1993 |
I second that.
|
remmers
|
|
response 998 of 1000:
|
Oct 24 22:03 UTC 1993 |
But don't freeze it until it reaches 1000 responses!
|
remmers
|
|
response 999 of 1000:
|
Oct 24 22:03 UTC 1993 |
I mean, really...
|
