You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   72-96   97-121   122-146   147-171   172-196   197-221 
 222-246   247-271   272-296   297-321   322-346   347-371   372-378    
 
Author Message
25 new of 378 responses total.
richard
response 97 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 17:21 UTC 2006

edina I read that some people who've had the surgery don't eat three meals
a day, but starve themselves long enough that they are hungry enough to eat
one regular sized meal without getting sick.  Is that what you do now?
edina
response 98 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 17:24 UTC 2006

No.  Nor does that even make sense.
tod
response 99 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 17:26 UTC 2006

re #84
 Society decided it's society's business, due to insurance costs, to
 have laws about motorcycle helmets, seat belts, drunk driving, no-fault
 insurance, and smoking tobacco.  It's well established that, if it
 affects insurance costs, it's in the public interest.  I don't like it
 either but I see no reason why obesity should be exempt. 
Well, I can imagine a few scenarios why it should be exempt.  It could be
considered a religious freedom in some cultures(some Pacific Islanders) to
be overweight.  I can also see folks like the fast food lobby being against
anything that would cut into their revenues.  Also, if we're going to talk
about being at risk..why not require everyone to drink a glass of red wine
on a daily basis otherwise they should be penalized?  How about mental health?
Should we penalize people for not having a healthy sex life or for not having
a sex life at all?
scholar
response 100 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 17:30 UTC 2006

By the way:  The latest medical evidence spreads all sorts of doubt about
even moderately being beneficial rather than detrimental to your health.

Not that I'd get in the way of you having a few drinks!
jep
response 101 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 17:32 UTC 2006

   It could be considered a religious freedom in some cultures(some    
   Pacific Islanders) to be overweight.

So could smoking tobacco.  Drinking alcohol has religious connotations 
for some as well.

   I can also see folks like the fast food lobby being against anything 
   that would cut into their revenues.

So was the tobacco industry, remember?

   Also, if we're going to talk about being at risk..why not require 
   everyone to drink a glass of red wine on a daily basis otherwise 
   they should be penalized?

No proven effect.  If there was, maybe we might see that as well.

   How about mental health?  Should we penalize people for not having a
   healthy sex life or for not having a sex life at all?

What are you talking about?
scholar
response 102 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 17:39 UTC 2006

Your mother.
tod
response 103 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 17:49 UTC 2006

re #101
    It could be considered a religious freedom in some cultures(some
    Pacific Islanders) to be overweight.
 So could smoking tobacco.  Drinking alcohol has religious connotations
 for some as well.
That's why its legal to smoke in Indian casinos where otherwise a state
has made smoking in public illegal.

    Also, if we're going to talk about being at risk..why not require
    everyone to drink a glass of red wine on a daily basis otherwise
    they should be penalized?
 No proven effect.  If there was, maybe we might see that as well.
Nobody is forced to eat apples.

    How about mental health?  Should we penalize people for not having a
    healthy sex life or for not having a sex life at all?
 What are you talking about?
http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletters/Harvard_Mens_Health_Watch.htm
scholar
response 104 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 17:52 UTC 2006

jep is a vagina and todd (who is a penis) is fucking him.
nharmon
response 105 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 17:55 UTC 2006

and scholar is an asshole, who needs to be fucked before he shits all 
over everything.
tod
response 106 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 17:57 UTC 2006

re #104
Can I used that or did you copyright it?
scholar
response 107 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 17:59 UTC 2006

Re. 105:  Dude.  Seriously, I was just putting things away and saw the
Christmas card you sent me and wondered what you would think of all this!

But, uh, equally seriously, uh, I have perfectly fine bowel control, though
that might change if someone fucks me.

Re. 106:  You're welcome to use it, though I'm pretty sure I at least derived
it from some other source.  I'm not sure, though.
slynne
response 108 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:03 UTC 2006

resp:83 Perhaps fat people cost society money. But so what? Men (as a 
group) weigh more than women (as a group) but I dont see you bitching 
about men externalizing their jet fuel costs on to  women.. Why is that 
do you think? Is it because you are a man? Poor people probably cost 
society a lot of money, should we shame people for being poor?  There 
is no way that every group is going to cost the same as every other 
group. And there are people who save society money and people who cost 
society money. The truth is that you have no idea how much money fat 
people are costing you. You don t even know if there is a net cost. You 
give one example and it turns out to be a very small amount. For all 
you know, fat people might be saving you money in other ways. But even 
if it turned out that fat people cost thin people some money, so what? 
Do you really want to live in a world where people run around worrying 
about how much some other group is costing them? 

Resp:84 The main reason is that things like wearing seatbelts and 
wearing helmets and smoking, etc are all behaviors and not a state of 
being. Fat is a state of being. Eating a poor diet is a behavior. Now, 
granted most people who eat a poor diet end up being heavier than they 
otherwise would be. But that doesn t mean that every fat person eats a 
bad diet. There is natural size diversity in our species. If you take a 
group of people and feed them the exact same diet and make sure they 
get the exact same amount of exercise, there will still be a range of 
weights within that group. Now, if you are suggesting that we ban junk 
food, I might not agree with it but at least that is something similar 
to requiring someone to wear a seat belt. 

I think that a lot of people have a way of thinking about fat people 
that often is not based on fact. They think that fat people are lazy 
and weak and could be thin if they wanted to. All it takes is a little 
will power, right. I have yet to meet a person who says this who has 
any kind of facts to back it up other than anecdotal evidence  (Oprah 
did it, anyone can do it). I also have yet to meet a person who has 
actually lost a large amount of weight and kept it off who makes 
comments like  all it takes is a little will power  because those 
people know the effort that goes into sustained weight loss.  The same 
people who often believe that people are fat because of bad behavior 
usually seem to believe that obesity is a terminal illness and is 
costing everyone tons of money. Are there health risks associated with 
obesity? Yes. Are people s reactions to those probably out of 
proportion with the actual risks? Almost definitely.

The media feeds all of this by using scare terminology like  Obesity 
Epidemic  and writing articles like the one Cyklone linked to about how 
fat costs millions just in jet fuel alone. The article never mentions 
how much that cost is per airline ticket purchased because it simply 
wouldn t be as sensational. I get very frustrated with the media and 
their coverage on anything that has anything to do with obesity. They 
seldom include meaningful statistics. They use language designed to 
frame the issue in a way that scares people. 

Believe it or not, there is a lot of fat hatred in our culture. A lot 
of good people have a strong bias against fat people in the same way 
that a lot of good people are prejudiced against black people or gay 
people or whatever other group. I think that a lot of people use the 
health risks of obesity and any other costs they can dream up to 
justify discrimination against fat people in the same way that people 
use AIDS and the increased costs of that disease to justify 
discrimination against gay people.  

I am not saying that anyone on here is necessarily doing that but 
people do that all the time. I have read editorials that were published 
in major newspapers that said that things like having stores that sell 
fashionable clothes for fat people or having resorts that cater to fat 
people is wrong because it encourages people to be fat. Never mind the 
thousand comments a day that I hear just from people I know. Honestly, 
as a fat person, I am very thankful that I live in a city that bans 
discrimination against a person based on their weight and that I live 
in a state that considers weight a protected class of employment. 
scholar
response 109 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:06 UTC 2006

I like fat people and don't think they should have to pay extra and feel bad.

 :(
slynne
response 110 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:08 UTC 2006

Well, thank you scholar. 
scholar
response 111 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:13 UTC 2006

You're welcome!

You can repay me by teaching me how to dance like John Travolta did in Pulp
Fiction!

Then I'd be cool!
richard
response 112 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:14 UTC 2006

re #108 the bias against fat people is because too many people just assume
that a person has gotten fat out of bad habits.  They don't take into account
that not everyone's metabolism works at the same rate and that fatness can
be tied into genetics.  Notice how many fat parents have fat kids.  Sometimes
there is nothing you can do about it
nharmon
response 113 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:20 UTC 2006

Scholar, have you seen "Team America: World Police" ? If not, you 
probably misunderstood my joke ;)
tod
response 114 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:21 UTC 2006

Watch a platoon of Marine recruits from beginning to end.  You won't see one
fatbody on graduation day yet many of them started off as such.  The behavior
change made all the difference.  Sleep, exercise, nutrition, the whole 9
yards play integral parts.  Its also a proven fat that being obese is bad for
mental health.  
slynne
response 115 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:26 UTC 2006

resp:112 Indeed. And it doesnt help that most fat people do have bad 
eating habits and dont exercise. People just selectively dont notice 
that most thin people also have bad eating habits and dont exercise. 

resp:114 The Marines wont take people above a certain weight in the 
first place. And what happens to Marines who fail to get into shape in 
boot camp? I will say that the lifestyle of your average Marine isnt 
something that most Americans have the time to do. But hey, if the life 
of a Marine really is good for weight loss, they might want to use that 
when they try to recruit new people. 

Also re resp:114 - Yes, there is a strong correlation between certain 
mental disorders and being fat. But is that because fat people have to 
deal with people constantly telling them that they are worthless, lazy, 
disgusting people or does the extra body fat actually cause a change in 
brain chemicals. Or maybe, depression can cause a person to overeat. 
Who knows?
scholar
response 116 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:27 UTC 2006

I believe that some people have a tendency to be fatter than other people
(based on what foods they were fed as children, their metabolism, how strong
their urges to eat are, where they live, depression, anxiety, availability
of exercise, etc.), but that everyone knows how to lose weight and it's really
actually pretty simple, and so it's merely a battle of will-power and being
able to supress the possibly severe discomfort, but that due to the
environment in which we evolved, this can be very difficult and probably
impossible for some people.
edina
response 117 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:40 UTC 2006

Re 115  Ok - who is constantly telling you that you are worthless, lazy or
disgusting?  Because I'm not hearing it, and I know at one time I was bigger
than you.  
richard
response 118 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:41 UTC 2006

re #116 it is not always simple to lose weight, because everyone's metabolisms
work at different rates.  
edina
response 119 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 18:42 UTC 2006

Really Richard?  Really?  do you think?  
scholar
response 120 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 19:09 UTC 2006

All I'm saying is that there were strong evolutionary advantages to people
eating as much food as possible, and that this was good when food would
sometimes be scarce but is a disadvantage now when we're producing food much
faster than we can eat it.

One thing that I think might happen:  Since people who are obese have less
healthy babies and fewer sexual partners (probably), will less voracious genes
become more plentiful?  I'm not sure how to go about analyzing that
scientifically, but it seems sort of plausible to me!

To sum up:  take up nicotine or cocaine for a few months to lose weight.
edina
response 121 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 19:12 UTC 2006

I need some cites on your info of less healthy babies - and fewer sexual
partners.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   72-96   97-121   122-146   147-171   172-196   197-221 
 222-246   247-271   272-296   297-321   322-346   347-371   372-378    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss