|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 251 responses total. |
krj
|
|
response 93 of 251:
| 
Jan 17 21:15 UTC 2003 |
Polytarp, and other ids originating from the same address as polytarp,
is flooding crap into party and rendering it unusable.
Other ids include "tabs" and "jimt".
|
naftee
|
|
response 94 of 251:
|
Jan 18 03:56 UTC 2003 |
"Rendering it unusable"? Assuming it doesn't crash party (which I doubt it
would) haven't you heard of the :ignore command?
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 95 of 251:
|
Jan 18 04:25 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 96 of 251:
|
Jan 18 12:55 UTC 2003 |
The fact that there are defenses against rudeness is no excuse for
rudeness.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 97 of 251:
|
Jan 18 14:13 UTC 2003 |
Good line, John. It should be on a bumper sticker or coffee cup.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 98 of 251:
|
Jan 18 15:28 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 99 of 251:
|
Jan 18 15:50 UTC 2003 |
Wow. You are a major asshole! Happy?
|
russ
|
|
response 100 of 251:
|
Jan 18 18:14 UTC 2003 |
If polytarp is causing problems, why not drop packets from
his ISP's netblock and/or complain to his ISP?
|
polytarp
|
|
response 101 of 251:
|
Jan 18 19:27 UTC 2003 |
other, if that bored you, remember that the only ones who get bored are those
who are boring.
|
gull
|
|
response 102 of 251:
|
Jan 18 19:59 UTC 2003 |
Re #98: That was pointless.
Re #100: Blocking anyone's netblock should be a last resort, since it
can affect innocent parties who happen to use the same ISP.
|
russ
|
|
response 103 of 251:
|
Jan 18 23:34 UTC 2003 |
If the problems do not cease, I suggest we pursue civil or criminal
penalties against polytarp. See this:
http://www.cleveland.com/tech/plaindealer/index.ssf?%2Fbase%2Fbusiness%2F10
4288693631280.xml
|
jep
|
|
response 104 of 251:
|
Jan 18 23:54 UTC 2003 |
Polytarp is in Canada. Even if he was in Washtenaw County, Grex
doesn't have the resources to sue him. Ignore him.
|
tonster
|
|
response 105 of 251:
|
Jan 19 01:11 UTC 2003 |
why does nooone do anything to prevent people from being affected by
polytarps shit? Block his IP! You don't need to block his netblock.
scribble that stupid response above with the contents of
the /etc/passwd file. Why waste the bandwidth to download all that
shit when you're using backtalk or picospan? I really don't understand
why grex staff lets it continue. Grex is slow enough as it is.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 106 of 251:
|
Jan 19 02:06 UTC 2003 |
fag.
|
russ
|
|
response 107 of 251:
|
Jan 19 02:21 UTC 2003 |
Re #102: It would only be necessary to block the netblock until
the ISP or criminal authorities had taken action against the abuser.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 108 of 251:
|
Jan 19 02:22 UTC 2003 |
re #105: Staff could block his IP but if he's determined to be an obnoxious
twit (and all evidence indicates that he is..) he'd just come in from another
IP. And they could scribble his response, but that will just encourage him
to post it again, and again..
|
polytarp
|
|
response 109 of 251:
|
Jan 19 02:23 UTC 2003 |
fag.
|
tonster
|
|
response 110 of 251:
|
Jan 19 02:53 UTC 2003 |
resp:108: Then scribble it again. after a few hours, he'll stop.
he'll also quickly run out of IP's to access grex from.
|
jiffer
|
|
response 111 of 251:
|
Jan 19 05:19 UTC 2003 |
If you ignore him (which you are not, thus he gets the attention he so
desires) he may eventually stop and/ or go away. Think of him as a
misbehaving 2 year old.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 112 of 251:
|
Jan 19 05:21 UTC 2003 |
hehe. look at yourself, jiffer.
|
other
|
|
response 113 of 251:
|
Jan 19 14:20 UTC 2003 |
Frankly, I think of a misbehaving 2 year old as having more intelligence.
|
keesan
|
|
response 114 of 251:
|
Jan 28 22:46 UTC 2003 |
Lynx won't access sites - just keeps waiting for something to happen.
|
other
|
|
response 115 of 251:
|
Jan 28 22:59 UTC 2003 |
I was dialed in a while ago, and it looked like Grex's internet
connection died when most of the users simultaneously ceased to be logged
in.
|
krokus
|
|
response 116 of 251:
|
Jan 28 23:40 UTC 2003 |
I am unable to telnet in from work, which I have done in the past.
Right now, I'm telnetting to m-nut, then here from there. I have been
able to telnet here directly in the past, but this is the first time
I have tried in probably a month or more.
|
keesan
|
|
response 117 of 251:
|
Jan 28 23:47 UTC 2003 |
Lynx works again now.
|
