|
Grex > Oldcoop > #288: Nominations for the 2006 Grex Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 24 new of 115 responses total. |
keesan
|
|
response 92 of 115:
| 
Dec 3 14:39 UTC 2005 |
Has it ever happened that N-1 people ran for N slots?
|
remmers
|
|
response 93 of 115:
|
Dec 3 14:46 UTC 2005 |
I think it happened last year.
|
aruba
|
|
response 94 of 115:
|
Dec 3 14:57 UTC 2005 |
I believe last year we had 4 people for 3 slots.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 95 of 115:
|
Dec 3 18:39 UTC 2005 |
Wouldn't that be N+1 people for N slots? I think what Sindi was asking
is, have we have had less candidates than open slots available?
|
aruba
|
|
response 96 of 115:
|
Dec 4 06:27 UTC 2005 |
We've always had enough candidates to fill the vacancies, as far back as I
can remember.
|
remmers
|
|
response 97 of 115:
|
Dec 4 12:34 UTC 2005 |
We've had enough candidates as far back as I can remember too. i.e. to
the beginning of Grex.
|
remmers
|
|
response 98 of 115:
|
Dec 16 18:09 UTC 2005 |
Okay, the election is over and the vote program shut itself off.
Even though it's not a contest this year, I'll report the totals
when I get confirmation from the treasury dept. that the voter
rolls are up-to-date.
|
aruba
|
|
response 99 of 115:
|
Dec 16 22:13 UTC 2005 |
THe voter rolls are in a bit of disarray for the moment, so please be
patient. I know this race was a nail-biter, and everyone is anxiously
awaiting the outcome, but we wouldn't want a recount...
|
mcnally
|
|
response 100 of 115:
|
Dec 16 23:54 UTC 2005 |
Accuracy be damned, I need closure!
|
remmers
|
|
response 101 of 115:
|
Dec 18 12:36 UTC 2005 |
Closure has arrived! 20 out of 62 eligible members voted. The total
votes received by each candidate are as follows:
aruba 20
bhoward 18
polygon 18
slynne 17
Since the number of candidates equalled the number of board vacancies,
everybody is elected.
The vote program allows non-members to vote too, although their votes
don't count in determining the outcome. Eighteen non-members voted; the
totals are:
aruba 5
bhoward 10
polygon 9
slynne 7
|
scholar
|
|
response 102 of 115:
|
Dec 18 15:53 UTC 2005 |
i hope slynne doesn't feel bad. :(
|
cross
|
|
response 103 of 115:
|
Dec 18 16:17 UTC 2005 |
Everybody's a winner!
|
scholar
|
|
response 104 of 115:
|
Dec 18 17:17 UTC 2005 |
except slynne is the least winningest. :(
|
aruba
|
|
response 105 of 115:
|
Dec 18 17:25 UTC 2005 |
Wow, not many people voted. THanks to everyone who did.
|
keesan
|
|
response 106 of 115:
|
Dec 18 18:05 UTC 2005 |
Congratulations aruba, for getting the most votes.
I wonder why two members bothered to vote, without voting for everyone?
Maybe they did not understand how the voting process worked or were
semiliterate and thought you could vote for only one.
Thanks to all of you for agreeing to run in this election and I hope we can
find someone to run in the next election.
|
remmers
|
|
response 107 of 115:
|
Dec 18 20:51 UTC 2005 |
Re #105: I imagine the turnout was lower than usual because it wasn't
a contest.
|
naftee
|
|
response 108 of 115:
|
Dec 18 23:30 UTC 2005 |
maybe because the weather was crummy.
by weather, i mean uptime
|
scholar
|
|
response 109 of 115:
|
Dec 18 23:42 UTC 2005 |
Don't upset the flora of my vagina.
|
keesan
|
|
response 110 of 115:
|
Dec 18 23:44 UTC 2005 |
It was higher when we had more paying members.
|
cross
|
|
response 111 of 115:
|
Dec 19 01:10 UTC 2005 |
Maybe people just don't care as much.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 112 of 115:
|
Dec 19 02:12 UTC 2005 |
> Maybe they did not understand how the voting process worked or were
> semiliterate and thought you could vote for only one.
You don't really believe that, do you?
|
keesan
|
|
response 113 of 115:
|
Dec 19 03:38 UTC 2005 |
Do you have a better theory?
|
nharmon
|
|
response 114 of 115:
|
Dec 19 04:31 UTC 2005 |
I would bet it was deliberate.
|
jesuit
|
|
response 115 of 115:
|
May 17 02:15 UTC 2006 |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
|