|
Grex > Agora47 > #99: THIS IA A TEST TO SEE IF THAT FATASS SLYNNE HAS EVERYONE IN HER TWIT FILTER | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 52 responses total. |
slynne
|
|
response 9 of 52:
| 
Oct 19 17:14 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
slynne
|
|
response 10 of 52:
|
Oct 19 17:15 UTC 2003 |
oh, this item is so tantalizingly invisible. I can hardly stand it ;)
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 11 of 52:
|
Oct 19 17:23 UTC 2003 |
resp:8 Everyone's got an opinion. I still note that you can still
look at responses with a filter on if you want. Just takes a little
more time.
|
sabre
|
|
response 12 of 52:
|
Oct 19 21:55 UTC 2003 |
re#8
True...russ is a total idiot.
re#9 and 10
HaHa..I see you had seconds thoughts on your reponse#9
I know how to read it anyway..nothing is lost on this system...HaHa
Really I mean it. It is still readable. Just look in /h1b/bbs/censored.
WHoop whoop there it IS.
And if this item is so invisible why are you postong to it? Has all that fat
cut off circulation to your cerebral cortex?
Re#11
Oh..it's ole billy eats muff. Back on my porch..jaklulantern.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 13 of 52:
|
Oct 20 03:18 UTC 2003 |
(The file is /bbs/censored and has been depermitted, per a membership vote
some time back.)
|
janc
|
|
response 14 of 52:
|
Oct 20 03:27 UTC 2003 |
Re 7: I filter out everyone smarter than me, so that I can maintain the sense
of being the smartest person on Grex. You'll have noticed that I never
respond to md, remmers, or mcnalley.
|
sabre
|
|
response 15 of 52:
|
Oct 20 06:15 UTC 2003 |
re#13
well........that sucks
|
remmers
|
|
response 16 of 52:
|
Oct 20 16:15 UTC 2003 |
Sorry pvn, but I recently started using a twit filter. (Obviously,
you're not on it (yet).) Guess my standing with you just went down
the tubes, eh? I'll leave it to the smarter Grexers to figure out
who I'm filtering.
|
cross
|
|
response 17 of 52:
|
Oct 20 17:13 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 18 of 52:
|
Oct 20 17:25 UTC 2003 |
I m getting tired of sabre. His items are dumb. But, we do have
interesting spin-offs.
I don't have a twit-filter, mainly because I'm too lazy to figure out
how to use one. Also, I believe that scrolling past a response I don't
want to read works just as fine. Twit filters would come in handy for
times when a twit has been posting all over agora, and you get excited
seeing that there are 34 new responses, and you find that they're all
posted by the twit, and like you've wasted your time following his
inane postings around. Yeah, I guess a twit filter would be good in
those cases. But like I said, I'm lazy. And those instances are too
rare for me to bother.
|
md
|
|
response 19 of 52:
|
Oct 20 17:40 UTC 2003 |
Well, I have to guess that Dr. Remmers is using the twit filter on
sabre. Nothing interesting there, so why not blank it out?
There are so many fun ways a person like sabre could disrupt some poor
bbs he's decided to pick on. The method he picked -- thumping his
chest, threatening people, accusing people of being thin-skinned or
humorless when nobody laughs at his unfunny posts, explaining why
people ignore him by saying they're intellectually inferior to him,
yada yada yada -- requires no special skill, and consequently is just
dull and predictable. We've seen it lots of times before. Anybody
could do it. Janc could write a bot to do, fer chrissake. "Egotism is
the anesthetic for the pain of being stupid."
So, here's the challenge: if you wanted to come to grex or mnet and
really, really shake things up, how would you do it?
|
tod
|
|
response 20 of 52:
|
Oct 20 17:50 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
keesan
|
|
response 21 of 52:
|
Oct 20 18:43 UTC 2003 |
To use a twit filter, type (at the start of a line) ignore sabre
Next time you log on, all of sabre's responses will appear blank.
Unfortunately if sabre was the last one to post in an item, you still
have to look at that item (as a blank). If you want to add a name to
your twit filter, you have to type in all the previous names as well
as the new one or you will only filter the new one.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 22 of 52:
|
Oct 20 19:32 UTC 2003 |
It seems that the using a twit filter will not solve the only problem
for which I would want to use the twit-filter. Oh well.
Questioning policy seems to be the most reliable method so far of
shaking things up on mnet/grex.
|
tod
|
|
response 23 of 52:
|
Oct 20 20:02 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
slynne
|
|
response 24 of 52:
|
Oct 20 21:45 UTC 2003 |
resp:19 - Well, one time I tried to make a pseudo that would shake
things up. I tried to come up with a personality that was about as
offensive as I could think of. I said all kinds of mean and nasty
things to folks. And do you know what they did? They LAUGHED at me. Oh
the horror!
|
cross
|
|
response 25 of 52:
|
Oct 20 22:35 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
tod
|
|
response 26 of 52:
|
Oct 21 00:05 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
sabre
|
|
response 27 of 52:
|
Oct 21 02:48 UTC 2003 |
re#19
Shut up you remmers puppet. remmers did create your persona after all and you
have the nerve to call me uninteresting. Ha. You are so pathetic that the only
way you can get "respect"(as if that would pay for a cup of coffee) is to ride
on the coattails of an old goat like remmers. remmers has me in twit filter
because he lascks the youthful energy needed to spar with my massive
intelligence. I think mary needs to change the geritol bottle on his IV.She
will...as soon as she gets over her menopausal hot flashes.
re#22 mynxcat..a commie liberal like you thinks the solution to a problem is
to eliminate the voice of everyone who doesn't agree with you.
You are just trying to fit in. I haven't read one post of yours that is
original. You are nothing but a liberal parrot spouting out concepts you don't
even understand....let alone truly believe in. You are one of the admirers
of the king's new clothes...you deon't have the guts to stand up and expose
his nudity. You are swimming..no you're DROWNING in the fallacy of ad
populace. You always will be...because there isn't an original thought in that
pretty,empty head of yours.
I mispelled don't due to fast typing but I will not correct it. Do you kn ow
why? Because when morons like the twits on grex focus on such mundane and
trivial issues they miss the whole point of the argument.
Liberal are all idiots.
|
md
|
|
response 28 of 52:
|
Oct 21 03:21 UTC 2003 |
(And you *still* can't get anybody to take the bait. Doesn't it just
make you crazy??)
I don't believe questioning policy is the answer. There were a couple
of occasions on Grex when the censored log policy caused a lot of
people to type a lot of words, but that's about it. mnet is so mired
in apathy and fatalism that Jamie (I think it was) could enter a long
jeremiad and get practically nothing but the usual string of one-liners
in response.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 29 of 52:
|
Oct 21 05:13 UTC 2003 |
There was that little incident when I deleted twinkie's posts, and then the
whole non-local board member issue on grex. Ok, not really "shaking up", but
the closests it's come to in years.
|
jp2
|
|
response 30 of 52:
|
Oct 21 12:44 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 31 of 52:
|
Oct 21 14:32 UTC 2003 |
I don't use twit filters on Grex because the twit problem has yet to
reach the magnitude that I think it's necessary. However, I made
liberal use of my killfile when I read Usenet.
|
tod
|
|
response 32 of 52:
|
Oct 21 15:37 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 33 of 52:
|
Oct 21 15:59 UTC 2003 |
The bat computer is wrong then.
|