|
Grex > Coop > #292: Nominations Open for 2011 Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 123 responses total. |
remmers
|
|
response 87 of 123:
| 
Dec 18 18:06 UTC 2010 |
Um, TS, are you not receiving your mail? I've asked you a couple of
times for a member list so that I can report the results of the Board
election, but no response. But I see you posting in BBS, so I'll ask
again here.
|
richard
|
|
response 88 of 123:
|
Dec 19 08:09 UTC 2010 |
re #87 perhaps ts thinks he's going to lose the election, so he's laying
low in order to prevent the results from being certified. Is TS the
only one who can provide a member list?
|
veek
|
|
response 89 of 123:
|
Dec 19 09:11 UTC 2010 |
he wouldn't have stood for elections if he was worried about defeat
|
jgelinas
|
|
response 90 of 123:
|
Dec 19 12:33 UTC 2010 |
The Treasurer is the only one can certify the member list, because the
Treasurer is the one who receives the dues payments.
|
cross
|
|
response 91 of 123:
|
Dec 19 13:25 UTC 2010 |
resp:88 You take Grex way too seriously. TS has provided the list to the
board.
|
remmers
|
|
response 92 of 123:
|
Dec 19 13:38 UTC 2010 |
Okay, I received the list of eligible voting members from TS and can now
report the election results. Ten of twelve eligible members voted,
results as follows:
gelinas 5
jadecat 4
tsty 1
Joe Gelinas has been elected.
(Unofficial non-member votes: Four non-members voted.
gelinas 2
jadecat 2)
|
cross
|
|
response 93 of 123:
|
Dec 19 13:44 UTC 2010 |
Congratulations, Joe.
|
mary
|
|
response 94 of 123:
|
Dec 19 14:05 UTC 2010 |
Thanks to all three candidates for being willing to serve on the board.
That's a generous offer.
|
jgelinas
|
|
response 95 of 123:
|
Dec 19 14:20 UTC 2010 |
Half of you voted for me. I appreciate the confidence. :)
|
mary
|
|
response 96 of 123:
|
Dec 19 14:33 UTC 2010 |
I hope you can still appreciate it in another month, or six. ;-)
|
tsty
|
|
response 97 of 123:
|
Dec 19 15:48 UTC 2010 |
congratz gelinas....
|
jadecat
|
|
response 98 of 123:
|
Dec 19 16:39 UTC 2010 |
I'll say it again here- Congrats Joe. :)
And thank you to everyone who voted for me. Maybe we'll try again next
year!
|
richard
|
|
response 99 of 123:
|
Dec 19 17:58 UTC 2010 |
darn if tsty hadn't voted himself (presumably) there could have been a
runoff
|
jgelinas
|
|
response 100 of 123:
|
Dec 25 19:59 UTC 2010 |
Perhaps it's time to remove the link to the voting booth from the home
page?
|
kentn
|
|
response 101 of 123:
|
Dec 25 21:22 UTC 2010 |
Yes, it is. I have a patch for it if any root wants to apply it to
the subversion repository and regenerate the web site. Let me know
if you want it.
|
jgelinas
|
|
response 102 of 123:
|
Dec 26 12:11 UTC 2010 |
(It really shouldn't be that hard to comment out a single line of the
page. Just do it, already.)
|
veek
|
|
response 103 of 123:
|
Dec 26 12:14 UTC 2010 |
if someone is patching stuff.. i have a patch in ~veek/latest.diff
|
kentn
|
|
response 104 of 123:
|
Dec 26 15:51 UTC 2010 |
The patch I sent does comment out the line of code. Please patch
the related file in the repository so we can keep all the changes
in in sync and up to date.
|
remmers
|
|
response 105 of 123:
|
Dec 26 15:54 UTC 2010 |
(Re resp:102 - I agree, seems like overkill.)
|
kentn
|
|
response 106 of 123:
|
Dec 26 16:30 UTC 2010 |
I disagree. It is not overkill.
|
jgelinas
|
|
response 107 of 123:
|
Dec 30 20:59 UTC 2010 |
(Bureaucracy will kill us yet.)
|
kentn
|
|
response 108 of 123:
|
Dec 30 21:05 UTC 2010 |
If the benefits of version control aren't clear, then I'm left to wonder
how much programming project experience staff have in a multi-programmer
and multi-file environment.
|
jgelinas
|
|
response 109 of 123:
|
Jan 2 12:49 UTC 2011 |
Yes, the benefits of version control are clear to me. However, we are
talking about simply adding <!-- and --> around a block of text. If
they get lost, it's a simple matter to re-add them. For that, version
control, of any kind, is overkill.
|
kentn
|
|
response 110 of 123:
|
Jan 2 13:43 UTC 2011 |
So, you'd use version control for some changes and not others? That
makes no sense. And not using version control at all makes less
sense.
|
veek
|
|
response 111 of 123:
|
Jan 2 14:35 UTC 2011 |
resp:109 the difficulty might be in synchronizing stuff? If you add
comments by bypassing svn, when you next rsync, won;t those comments get
clobbered?
|