|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 335 responses total. |
keesan
|
|
response 86 of 335:
| 
Jun 30 23:48 UTC 2003 |
I have not received a confirmation email - two days since I submitted.
|
glenda
|
|
response 87 of 335:
|
Jul 1 00:07 UTC 2003 |
Then submit again. It took less than 5 minutes for my confirmation email to
arrive yesterday.
|
janc
|
|
response 88 of 335:
|
Jul 1 01:49 UTC 2003 |
Katherine Hepburn died. That's a pair of shoes that will never be filled.
|
slynne
|
|
response 89 of 335:
|
Jul 1 02:15 UTC 2003 |
No kidding
|
beeswing
|
|
response 90 of 335:
|
Jul 1 04:24 UTC 2003 |
The loons, Norman! The loons!
(sorry).
|
tod
|
|
response 91 of 335:
|
Jul 1 04:34 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
cross
|
|
response 92 of 335:
|
Jul 1 05:41 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
goose
|
|
response 93 of 335:
|
Jul 1 14:08 UTC 2003 |
Yeah, that was my experience Dan. However, I've yet to be able to click on
the link to complete the deal. It always tells me that the website is
unavailable and to try again later.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 94 of 335:
|
Jul 1 14:19 UTC 2003 |
I got the email late Friday night (I registered Friday morning/afternoon, and
clicked on it on Monday), and it was relatively painless.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 95 of 335:
|
Jul 1 20:01 UTC 2003 |
Loopsided triagle this time, as Buddy Hacket was found dead
on Monday.
|
keesan
|
|
response 96 of 335:
|
Jul 1 22:28 UTC 2003 |
I was persistent and kept going back to the site when I got error messages
or got there and could not arrow up and down, and finally signed in and got
my three emails a few minutes later. Last time I had not done the second
stage of the sign-in as I did not realize I had to page down to see it.
|
slynne
|
|
response 97 of 335:
|
Jul 2 13:31 UTC 2003 |
If anyone wants a coupon for 20% off at Borders/Waldenbooks, here is a
URL you can go to
http://www.bordersstores.com/features/feature.jsp?file=friendsandfamily
|
tod
|
|
response 98 of 335:
|
Jul 2 16:51 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gregb
|
|
response 99 of 335:
|
Jul 2 17:11 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gregb
|
|
response 100 of 335:
|
Jul 2 17:13 UTC 2003 |
Thanks, Lynne. I'm a Borders regular, so I can definitely use it.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 101 of 335:
|
Jul 3 04:59 UTC 2003 |
THANK YOU SLYNEE!
|
tod
|
|
response 102 of 335:
|
Jul 3 18:40 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
goose
|
|
response 103 of 335:
|
Jul 3 21:04 UTC 2003 |
That is really funny.
|
dcat
|
|
response 104 of 335:
|
Jul 4 01:02 UTC 2003 |
Anyone click on the links in the text? It just gets better :-D
|
gelinas
|
|
response 105 of 335:
|
Jul 4 01:45 UTC 2003 |
And don't miss
http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/blair.html
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 106 of 335:
|
Jul 5 09:34 UTC 2003 |
resp:103-104 Interesting, and yep.
|
tsty
|
|
response 107 of 335:
|
Jul 6 06:48 UTC 2003 |
regarding hte dnc lists - i hope that that is for 'selling' calls
only.
thre is a LOT of legitimate (no money involved) research that
requires a statistical random sampling given the universe of
available phn numbers.
at least if ithe dnc list is for 'sales' then the only pestering
calls will be from survey/research stuff - and i heartly recommmend that
those calls be received with grace .. adn answers ..
|
rcurl
|
|
response 108 of 335:
|
Jul 6 17:11 UTC 2003 |
You cannot get a "statistical random sampling" (of what?, by the way) by
telephone, because of the biases from who usually answers the phone, from
who is at home a lot, from who will or will not cooperate, and from the
demographic distribution of phone numbers.
Also by the way - who do you consider "legitimate" telephone pollsters?
|
mdw
|
|
response 109 of 335:
|
Jul 7 01:32 UTC 2003 |
I certainly don't cooperate with telephone surveys anymore. At one
point in the late 80's I ended up on somebody's "list". Everytime they
had a survey, they would call me up. Statistically, I assume they were
figuring that by hitting the same subset each time, they could more
easily correct for bias. I cooperated with this for a while. Then I
got a "farmer jack's" survey. I'm sure this one was professionally
oriented, but all of the questions were very narrowly tailored, and
almost completely irrelevant for me, as I was doing most of my shopping
at PFC at the time. I got annoyed at the assumptions that were being
made, and refused to cooperate with any more surveys.
|
scott
|
|
response 110 of 335:
|
Jul 7 06:57 UTC 2003 |
I tend to see surveys as a way to push my agenda. That, or question the
surveyor on minutae of the questions and why they don't have an option which
I consider optimimum. ;)
|