|
Grex > Coop13 > #43: Account of Board Candidate Terminated | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 130 responses total. |
jp2
|
|
response 82 of 130:
| 
Dec 5 13:51 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 83 of 130:
|
Dec 5 16:40 UTC 2003 |
I've never seen the load averages jump over 6 or 7 when mass-mailing with
nice.
|
remmers
|
|
response 84 of 130:
|
Dec 5 17:59 UTC 2003 |
On Grex?
|
naftee
|
|
response 85 of 130:
|
Dec 5 19:20 UTC 2003 |
Yes.
|
naftee
|
|
response 86 of 130:
|
Dec 6 00:09 UTC 2003 |
By the way, all the accounts that recieved the mail were off-site. I think
there was a sleep process as well. Only a person who didn't care about how
the system would run would neglect those two points.
|
jp2
|
|
response 87 of 130:
|
Dec 6 13:36 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 88 of 130:
|
Dec 6 15:55 UTC 2003 |
I hope you're moving that mail off-site.
|
valerie
|
|
response 89 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:10 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 90 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:15 UTC 2003 |
If the email size limit wasn't *in* newuser at the time jp2 registered, how
was he tohave known? And besides Jamie, how is anyone that has registered that
long ago supposed to know the limit on email?
|
naftee
|
|
response 91 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:20 UTC 2003 |
jp2's probably storing that 5mb odd replied mail on-site, thus filling up user
partitions. Once again, jp2's back to his old tricks. When will you people
learn.
|
keesan
|
|
response 92 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:50 UTC 2003 |
When we sent out 100 copies of a message it was for the Kiwanis club. Would
it have been better to space them out over a few days? (#69)
|
valerie
|
|
response 93 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:57 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
valerie
|
|
response 94 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:57 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 95 of 130:
|
Dec 7 03:02 UTC 2003 |
Oh, I'm not saying that the fact that this information wasn't available at
the time that jp registered should acquit him of wht he did. Just curious as
to how people should get to know that certain things like mass-emailing is
not acceptable if they weren't told when they made their account and were
never told or there was no chance to read about it elsewhere
|
jp2
|
|
response 96 of 130:
|
Dec 7 05:02 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 97 of 130:
|
Dec 7 05:08 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 98 of 130:
|
Dec 8 15:54 UTC 2003 |
Grex also suffers "collateral damage" from mass mailers -- they tend to
result in us getting blacklisted by SpamCop. SpamCop only seems to need
one complaint to trigger this.
|
jp2
|
|
response 99 of 130:
|
Dec 8 16:10 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 100 of 130:
|
Dec 8 17:20 UTC 2003 |
And your point is?
|
jp2
|
|
response 101 of 130:
|
Dec 8 18:19 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
willcome
|
|
response 102 of 130:
|
Dec 8 19:23 UTC 2003 |
Not quite when, is it.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 103 of 130:
|
Dec 16 17:33 UTC 2003 |
First of all, I really do not care what M-Net does.
Secondly, Jamie, you shot yourself in the foot by your own actions, no
one else's. Impulsive behavior screwed you over temporarily. Did it
not occur to you to wait until after the election and try to work with
the board--either as a board member or as a member of grex--to get
something like this started and see if staff could be alerted? It's
not staff's fault that your election got temporarily derailed.
Can you, for once, stop playing the martyr? It doesn't wear very well
one you.
|
flem
|
|
response 104 of 130:
|
Dec 16 17:44 UTC 2003 |
Heh, there's a part of me that thinks he was afraid we might actually
elect him this time, and sabotaged himself deliberately.
But most of me thinks he just likes making trouble.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 105 of 130:
|
Dec 16 17:50 UTC 2003 |
I think he really did care this once. And made very poor judgement on
how to go about it. His account was locked, and after reading all
responses concerning this, I'm satisfied with the fact that the right
thing was done. The voting program was pointed to hist statement, and
his account later restored. All of these I'm satisfied with. The
election is over, and I'll go by the outcome, whether he gets elected
or not. I don't think having his account locked for that one day
affected the outcome with regards to his count of votes.
Now can we drop this issue?
|
tod
|
|
response 106 of 130:
|
Dec 16 18:25 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|