|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 40 responses total. |
jazz
|
|
response 8 of 40:
| 
Apr 2 15:16 UTC 2002 |
I used to want that from my partner, now I want, ideally, to really
expand their horizons or meet fantasies they didn't know they had, or, for
more ordinary sex, to just have a real good time.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 9 of 40:
|
Apr 2 16:31 UTC 2002 |
I think part of it, too, is that men usually feel like sex is incomplete
unless they've had an orgasm. It's not that much of a jump to project that
attitude onto your partner.
|
oval
|
|
response 10 of 40:
|
Apr 2 16:53 UTC 2002 |
oh my, people.
at least one orgasm is really not all that much to work for is it?! of course
you wan to "expand their horizons or meet fantasies they didn't know they had,
or, for
more ordinary sex, to just have a real good time" but it seems to me like
an orgasm would be a natural side effect of that ..
there are time when i simply cannot come, but really i'd expect to in most
cases. in most cases i would feel unfulfilled .. not all. and thats
physically, not emotionally.
|
phenix
|
|
response 11 of 40:
|
Apr 2 19:39 UTC 2002 |
well, there's always proper foreplay to consider and mr. happy hand
|
oval
|
|
response 12 of 40:
|
Apr 2 21:49 UTC 2002 |
come again?
|
phenix
|
|
response 13 of 40:
|
Apr 2 23:06 UTC 2002 |
<sigh> book on EMO states that the best way to just relax is hands
|
morwen
|
|
response 14 of 40:
|
Apr 2 23:27 UTC 2002 |
Aw, Oval. Bad pun for this item.
|
phenix
|
|
response 15 of 40:
|
Apr 3 00:09 UTC 2002 |
EMO=Extended massive orgasim
|
jazz
|
|
response 16 of 40:
|
Apr 3 00:51 UTC 2002 |
Re #10:
Well, it's a general case. If all it takes for you to have an orgasm
is a considerate and patient partner, then you're lucky. Not every woman is
equal in that regard. Sometimes it's physiology, sometimes psychology.
Either way, some people just have a harder time than others, and attempting
to push it will wear on both parties' nerves.
It's totally possible to meet a fantasy without an orgasm. Fantasies
don't even have to be completely sexual.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 17 of 40:
|
Apr 3 07:40 UTC 2002 |
resp:5 I'm not sure I 100% agree with that, although I think if we
were less repressed, we might have more depictions of happenstance
nudity in situations that were not sexual, such as pregnancy,
breastfeeding, etc. I don't think I agree gratituous sexual nudity is
a good idea. Neither is gratituous violence, either.
hmmm, up the nudity and tone down the violence? hmmm..
resp:6 what do you mean? would that include your little Johnny
boinking little Jane down the street? I suppose that idea would
necessitate a discussion on if media violence encourages children to
be violent, and likewise, media sex encourages children to have sex.
resp:7 Credit should be given where credit is due. It was
noteworthy, and therefore, the speaker was worth remembering too.
Now, as per se resp:9, if only I could adopt that attitude, I think
I'd be a bit more satisfied.
On the other hand, I really love to snuggle. I like sex, but I also
enjoy merely having nice, warm female in my bed who loves me a lot.
In my present case (and thenceforth) it's Julie, whose warm body also
reminds me of the precious child that is coming very soon.
resp:16 Why do you think some people roleplay? C'mon, you didn't
think all those scantily clad young females at conventions were purely
happenstance, do you? Well, then again, I should mention just them..
you look at anyone dressed up, and this is meeting a fantasy. Hey, at
our last convention, there was a BDSM demonstration and forum.
|
jazz
|
|
response 18 of 40:
|
Apr 3 15:21 UTC 2002 |
Huh?
|
jazz
|
|
response 19 of 40:
|
Apr 3 16:35 UTC 2002 |
And what kind of conventions are you talking about here? The only one
I regularly attend is Convocation, which is a good way to track down my old
Pagan buddies. That doesn't feature "scantily clad young females". The local
dance clubs do, however.
|
brighn
|
|
response 20 of 40:
|
Apr 3 17:05 UTC 2002 |
There are a few scantily clad young females at ConVocation. Not the bulk, but
some.
|
jazz
|
|
response 21 of 40:
|
Apr 3 17:59 UTC 2002 |
I missed the last one. I'M ALWAYS MISSING THE GOOD PARTIES. DAMMIT!
|
phenix
|
|
response 22 of 40:
|
Apr 3 18:34 UTC 2002 |
it's ok john. i have the spame problem.
|
oval
|
|
response 23 of 40:
|
Apr 3 21:06 UTC 2002 |
i guess i am lucky. but i wan't always ..
|
morwen
|
|
response 24 of 40:
|
Apr 4 00:07 UTC 2002 |
We are discussing Role Playing Conventions here, in which case there
are frequently young ladies dressed in the ever-popular chain-mail
bikini and other interesting costumes.
|
jazz
|
|
response 25 of 40:
|
Apr 4 00:32 UTC 2002 |
Ah ... I'm assuming you're referring to the RPG and LARP geek-niches,
and not BSDM role-playing? Both feature chain-mail bikinis.
|
phenix
|
|
response 26 of 40:
|
Apr 4 01:31 UTC 2002 |
wtf, i've yet to see a bikini chian mail chick at the rpg cons i go to
that's for those sci-fi freaks.
|
jazz
|
|
response 27 of 40:
|
Apr 4 01:32 UTC 2002 |
Aren't most sci-fi freaks kinda ... uhm ... nasty?
|
oval
|
|
response 28 of 40:
|
Apr 4 08:16 UTC 2002 |
prolly.
|
morwen
|
|
response 29 of 40:
|
Apr 4 10:39 UTC 2002 |
Well, actually most sci-fi freaks are disturbingly normal. The nasty
ones are generally rare and only into sci-fi for the conventions and
all that they entail.
I'll bet you anything that the BDSM discussion and demo Jon mentioned
was put on by one of those rare nasties.
|
michaela
|
|
response 30 of 40:
|
Apr 5 05:15 UTC 2002 |
I didn't mean that giving someone multiple orgasms is ALL I go for. It just
makes me feel good. I also enjoy the communication and laughter and playtime.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 31 of 40:
|
Apr 6 10:18 UTC 2002 |
that is a bonus.
I'll say it again-- snuggling is good.
|
morwen
|
|
response 32 of 40:
|
Apr 6 17:23 UTC 2002 |
I likes to snuggle.
|