|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 155 responses total. |
phenix
|
|
response 8 of 155:
| 
Sep 23 01:38 UTC 2001 |
i'd dye to be dateing a 23 year old girl!
hell
i'd die to be dating
|
brighn
|
|
response 9 of 155:
|
Sep 23 03:00 UTC 2001 |
The question, Greg, is whether you'd dye a 23 year old if you were dating
her....
I don't think I have a hard-and-fast age limit right now (other than 16), but
I don't seem much interested in people under 23 or so.
|
vidar
|
|
response 10 of 155:
|
Sep 23 14:01 UTC 2001 |
Generally my rule is no one under 18, although when I was interested in
Bree she was 17. However, I am usually more attracted to people who
are older than I am.
|
phenix
|
|
response 11 of 155:
|
Sep 23 15:21 UTC 2001 |
bree? from commie? the ultimate in chottie technologies?
dye only if she asked;)
|
michaela
|
|
response 12 of 155:
|
Sep 23 19:46 UTC 2001 |
Nobody under 23, and they *must* have life experience (i.e. paying rent,
working at least 25 hours a week, some school or a desire to go to school...)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 13 of 155:
|
Sep 24 19:09 UTC 2001 |
I think the Bree you know from commie is someone else, Greg. (But yeah, I'd
dye her...)
|
vidar
|
|
response 14 of 155:
|
Sep 24 20:54 UTC 2001 |
Re # 11: You wouldn't have known this Bree, Greg, as she lives in
Northville.
I may have already mentioned this, but I don't date co-workers: too
dangerous.
|
michaela
|
|
response 15 of 155:
|
Sep 25 00:44 UTC 2001 |
Same here. Been there, done that, went through the nonsense. Ick.
|
kewy
|
|
response 16 of 155:
|
Oct 1 04:32 UTC 2001 |
Stuff happens on accident. Maybe not on accident, but it generally doesn't
happen when you plan for it. I met my dude on Yahoo personals, I was looking
through it for kicks and grins.
|
arianna
|
|
response 17 of 155:
|
Oct 1 15:56 UTC 2001 |
<mental image of greg turning his next gf blue or puce colored>
I don't date. I hate dating. It's stupid.
If someone's mate material, I'll find out through friendship. The cornerstone
to a relationship should be friendship, anyway; so why bother going through
the motions of dating when you can just make friends. If something evolves
out of friendship, it's has more potential for longevity. If you remain
friends and no relationship occurs, than what have you lost?
|
flem
|
|
response 18 of 155:
|
Oct 1 18:05 UTC 2001 |
Sounds like you mean something different by "dating" than I do, arianna.
|
senna
|
|
response 19 of 155:
|
Oct 2 17:22 UTC 2001 |
It's almost always too random to apply to a system. I like it that way.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 20 of 155:
|
Oct 2 17:53 UTC 2001 |
(Are kicks and grins more or less entertaining than shits and giggles?)
"Dating" does seem to be a word that's expanding to fill all available space.
It seems to center around "met him for coffee a few times, we've fooled around
a little, I kind of like him," but I've heard it mean anywhere from "I talked
to him once and now he won't stop calling me" to "I haven't gotten around to
proposing marriage yet, but give me a few weeks."
|
snowth
|
|
response 21 of 155:
|
Oct 5 23:15 UTC 2001 |
Yeah 17! You totally think like I do. Dating sucks! Power to the people who
hate random people!
|
quintis
|
|
response 22 of 155:
|
Oct 21 02:22 UTC 2001 |
I have to say that I don't "hate" dating, but I have found it extremly
stressful and at times uncomfortable, so I'm not that fond of it either. At
this point in my life, though, the main problem seems to be just getting a
chance to meet new people. I agree that long term relationships should be on
a more solid base than "the sex that we had that first night was great , so
I'll stick around and see how the rest goes" sort of basis. As I said, its
the meeting of those new people to make new friends that has me stumped..
by the way, just what is "Ring of Steel"?
|
eeyore
|
|
response 23 of 155:
|
Oct 21 03:27 UTC 2001 |
Ummm...let's see....a tube-like round of extremely hard metal...
Sorry...couldn't resist. :)
Ring of Steel is a stage fencing group.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 24 of 155:
|
Oct 23 18:16 UTC 2001 |
<twitches at the word `fencing,' but lets it slide>
|
phenix
|
|
response 25 of 155:
|
Oct 23 22:29 UTC 2001 |
yha, fencing it isn't
no posts
no wire
bah
not even whitewash!
|
michaela
|
|
response 26 of 155:
|
Oct 24 00:39 UTC 2001 |
Stage sword-fighting group
|
orinoco
|
|
response 27 of 155:
|
Oct 25 03:00 UTC 2001 |
<stops twitching>
Jeez, you'd think after two or three years of not playing with them, I'd have
gotten over that reflex.
|
phenix
|
|
response 28 of 155:
|
Oct 25 20:37 UTC 2001 |
what reflex?
|
vidar
|
|
response 29 of 155:
|
Oct 25 22:28 UTC 2001 |
I used to fence, Ring of Steel is definately not fencing (although it
is in our reparte (sp?)). We prefer to call it Action Theatre or
Theatrical Combat and Stunt Troupe.
But if you really want to find out, there is a Free Demonstration
coming up next month. Look to rialto for details.
|
phenix
|
|
response 30 of 155:
|
Oct 25 23:00 UTC 2001 |
right
dear god why kung fu action theater?
|
vidar
|
|
response 31 of 155:
|
Oct 26 01:59 UTC 2001 |
Actually, most of our martial arts based moves are based on Aikido.
|
rlejeune
|
|
response 32 of 155:
|
Oct 26 14:08 UTC 2001 |
I thought aikido was one of the more recently developed martial arts? So how
can most others be based on it?
|