You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   53-77   78-102   103-127   128-152   153-177   178-202 
 203-218          
 
Author Message
25 new of 218 responses total.
keesan
response 78 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 00:33 UTC 2006

Has anyone calculated how close someone would need to be to receive 200
pellets from the gun?   Can you shoot 200 of them 30 yards in a straight line?
marcvh
response 79 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 00:41 UTC 2006

In case anybody hasn't been watching Faux News, Cheney has admitted to
drinking "a beer" at lunch.  It's plausible that it wasn't a factor in
the shooting (but it's certainly not a given.)
richard
response 80 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 00:42 UTC 2006

re #79 oh sure, Cheney only had ONE beer.  Anyone really believe that?
johnnie
response 81 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 00:48 UTC 2006

"A beer at lunch" is the standard reply when a policeman asks a drunk,
"Have you had anything to drink this evening, sir?"

Also, MSNBC has un-removed the beer reference in their article, without
so far saying why it was removed in the first place.

This, too:  The woman put forth as a witness to the shooting, Katharine
Armstrong, seems not to have actually seen much of anything.  In an
interview with the AP, she says she first knew something had happened
when she saw medical personnel rushing to the scene (she figured Cheney
had suffered a heart attack).  
 
And this tidbit (from the Fox interview):  After nearly killing his
friend, Cheney decided not to bother going to the hospital, since there
"wasn't room in the ambulance" (like there were no other cars around?).  
richard
response 82 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 01:10 UTC 2006

re #81 according to news reports, instead of going to the hospital, 
Cheney went home and poured himself a good stiff cocktail.
marcvh
response 83 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 01:15 UTC 2006

Maybe his Secret Service agents saw something.  We should depose them.
charcat
response 84 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 01:43 UTC 2006

my memories from my hunting days are that birdshot is usually #6 shot, a
little smaller than a standard bb and at 30 yards it is close to being
spent, might go a little damage possibly penetrate under the skin but
into the chest, through shirts and orange hunting jacket? I don't think
so. 50 yards would be just like a sprinkle of small hail stones. The
pattern would depend on the choke on the gun.
nharmon
response 85 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 03:25 UTC 2006

The ballastics of a shotgun blast depend on a lot of factors. Off the
top of my head, I can think of barrel length, muzzle choke, guage, shell
length, shell manufacturer, firearm manufacturer, whether the firearm is
pump-action; semi-automatic; or break-away are all factors that would
affect this. 
bru
response 86 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 06:19 UTC 2006

there are 225 pellets in an oz. of #6 shot in a standard 1 oz load for small
game birds.  The pellets are much smaller than a BB, almost half the size.

pattern sepends a lot on barrel length, choke, and the type of shotgun shell
used.

The point is, Cheney was involved in a hunting accident.  He fired his shotgun
adn injured his friend.

Had he been drinking?  I don't know and even if he had not been, came out and
said he had not been, there would still be people saying he must have been.

Going to the hospital would NOT have been an option in the eyes of the secret
service.  Not in the ambulance, not in his own car.  to have done so would
have endangered the life of his friend because 500 reporteres woul ahve shown
up and tried to find out what had happened, distracting the doctors and
hospital operations.
jep
response 87 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 13:24 UTC 2006

I would very likely have gone to a nearby house and had a drink, 
myself, if I'd just shot someone accidentally.

Yes, I find it credible that the vice president had a beer at lunch and 
then went hunting several hours later.  Why wouldn't I?  Other than for 
the purpose of trying to invent a better story, I see no reason for 
anyone not to believe that.

But then, I have no interest in the story beyond the uninteresting 
occurrance of a shooting accident.  It doesn't feel like a lost 
opportunity to me, if nothing else happened.  Others who have more of a 
stake in the event want more of a story.  And are willing to go to 
great lengths to get one; lengths to which, I prefer to believe, I 
would not go even if I was trying to make a political point as they 
are.  I want to hang on to my self-respect and credibility, which are 
more valuable to me than the warmth I would get from making up a story 
and pretending it is true.  Different people have different values, as 
we can see in this item.
janc
response 88 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 14:06 UTC 2006

I seem to remember back during the Monica Lewinsky scandal right wingers
on Grex were eagerly inventing facts they'd like to see reported.  Some
one claimed that Clinton probably sold Monica drugs too.  I wasn't much
impressed by such speculation then, and I'm not now.  I see no reason
not to believe that we weren't told a reasonable facimile of the truth
in this case.  I mean, if they were going to lie about it, then they'd
claim someone else was holding the gun, wouldn't they?  I think the
facts as they have now been reported might have been shaded a bit -
maybe he had two beers and maybe it was more like 20 yards - but are
essentially accurate.  A bit of macho swaggering and a bit of
inattention to the job at hand are quite enough to lead to an accident
like this without having to assume drunkeness.  I wouldn't condemn
Cheney on the basis of this incident.  On the basis of how he performs
his job on the other hand....
nharmon
response 89 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 14:16 UTC 2006

Good call Jan
johnnie
response 90 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 14:36 UTC 2006

>Going to the hospital would NOT have been an option in the eyes of the
>secret service....because 500 reporteres woul ahve shown up

That's a good point.  

It'd be a better point if Cheney had wanted to go the hospital, but he
didn't.  Too bad he didn't think of that; "Secret Service said I
couldn't go" is a much more sympathetic story than "I couldn't be
bothered to go". 

It'd be a better point, too, if they had informed the press in a timely
manner so that there was a danger of reporters showing up.  Regardless,
it would have been a small matter for the SecServ to control access in a
small county hospital.  

>I would very likely have gone to a nearby house and had a drink, 
>myself, if I'd just shot someone accidentally.

Ignoring the question of whether a man with a history of alcoholism and
on a long list of heart medication should be drinking at all, and
ignoring the fact that the VP and his entourage lied about his drinking
that day to the public and the police, then, yeah--me, too.

happyboy
response 91 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 17:14 UTC 2006

again...why the delay?
tod
response 92 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 17:20 UTC 2006

re #78
The choke was wide open according to the report.  They also said the distance
was 30 yards.  Neither jive with a 28 gauge birdshot.  10 yards makes more
sense...and for over 200 pellets to hit you on a wide open choke then we're
talking maybe 4 yards.  Cheney had to be drunk if he was spinning around to
shoot behind the way they were headed directly at another hunter.

re #88
Sex, guns, and violence.  Its a twisted world when gun violence gets less
attention than consentual sex.
johnnie
response 93 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 17:37 UTC 2006

FoxNews Journamalism ("Q" is Brit Hume):

THE VICE PRESIDENT: ...bird flushed and went to my right, off to the
west. I turned and shot at the bird, and at that second, saw Harry
standing there. Didn't know he was there --

Q You had pulled the trigger and you saw him?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, I saw him fall, basically. It had happened so
fast...I fired, and there's Harry falling. And it was, I'd have to say,
one of the worst days of my life, at that moment...He was struck in the
right side of his face, his neck and his upper torso on the right side
of his body.

Q And you -- and I take it, you missed the bird. 
---------
(Full text of the interview:  http://tinyurl.com/a2spu  )
happyboy
response 94 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 17:48 UTC 2006

cheney on his shooting victim:



"good friend"


"friend"


"aquaintance"
tod
response 95 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 17:50 UTC 2006

See, not only do they not find WMD but they can't even hit a bird.
These guys are running our country.

We gave you $100 billion for Iraqi reconstruction.  25% of it is MISSING.
What happened?  Why are all our necessary services being chopped off at the
elbows and knees to pay for these mistakes?
Do we get a response from Cheney on these issues after his hiding for 3 1/2
years? No.  We hear about his Barney Fife weekend after 3 1/2 years.
THANKS!!!
rcurl
response 96 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 18:30 UTC 2006

It strikes me that if one is holding a gun in the usual right-handed 
manner, there is poorer peripheral vision to the right than to the left 
when tracking a moving target, especially if one keeps both eyes open. I'm 
not a hunter so I don't know if this really the case. How is the shooter's 
visual perception different when a right-handed shooter is tracking a 
target to the right or left?
tod
response 97 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 19:31 UTC 2006

Cheney: heart meds, beer, big cokebottle glasses....
I dunno, man.
johnnie
response 98 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 20:55 UTC 2006

I wonder what went through ol' Harry's mind at the crucial moment. 
There can't be anything scarier than having Dick Cheney suddenly turn on
you with a shotgun.
tod
response 99 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 21:27 UTC 2006

re #98
Scarier would be that after you're laying there wounded, Mary Cheney comes
out in coveralls playing dueling banjos and you hear Rumsfeld saying "You got
a perty mouth, boy"
happyboy
response 100 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:44 UTC 2006

"you suck with the mouth you HAVE."
gull
response 101 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 04:13 UTC 2006

The county shriff, Ramon Salinas, has said that there's no evidence of
negligence and no charges will be filed:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/02/16/national/w12091
4S41.
DTL
johnnie
response 102 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 15:07 UTC 2006

>The county shriff, Ramon Salinas, has said that there's no evidence of
>negligence and no charges will be filed:

And a fine investigation it was.  When he got word from "Captain Kirk"
(snicker) that there'd been a shooting involving the VP, and Kirk had
been denied entry to the ranch (by a border patrol agent), Sheriff
Salinas didn't rush right out; instead, he called the former sheriff,
who happens now to be a ranch hand for the very wealthy Ms Armstrong who
owns the ranch where the shooting occured.  The former sheriff said,
"Uh...let me get back to you on that...", and indeed called later to
say, "Mmm...Accident.  Yep, nothing to worry about.   Accident, swear."
 So, Salinas decided not to send anyone out until the next morning.  

Thus far, the sheriff is refusing to release the supporting witness
statements or other coroborrating documents (did he get the victim's
medical report with BAC and wound details?).

Police report:  http://tinyurl.com/ck8nw
Texas Parks and Wildlife report:  http://tinyurl.com/arex4

Other fun tidbits (some from the investigative reports, some not):

* Cheney blasted his victim with an Italian-made Perazzi Brescia, MSRP
$23,000 (what--American-made not good enough for the VP?)

* Cheney said in his interview with Fox that the bird he was after went
to his right, but the sheriff's report says Cheney spun to his left.

* Whittington refused the investigator's request to tape-record the
interview, saying his voice was "raspy". 

* After the 78-year-old man was seriously wounded, Secret Service called
for a helicopter to med-evac him to the nearest trauma center, but the
VP's doctors(?) overruled them, instead opting to send him via ambulance
to a small non-trauma hospital (a long ride over back country roads). 
Very shortly after arriving there, hospital personnel insisted on
sending Whittington via helicopter to the nearest trauma center, where
he eventually arrived more than 2-1/2 hours after being shot.


* 
 0-24   25-49   50-74   53-77   78-102   103-127   128-152   153-177   178-202 
 203-218          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss