You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   52-76   77-91      
 
Author Message
15 new of 91 responses total.
jgelinas
response 77 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 01:20 UTC 2013

('Twould be nice to have a logOUT option in backtalk.)
jep
response 78 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 05:26 UTC 2013

Thanks Joe!
jep
response 79 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 02:27 UTC 2013

Joe, can the vote link be added to the MOTD when it is active, please?
jgelinas
response 80 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 9 00:58 UTC 2013

The command-line voting both has been closed for a while, I learned 
recently.  There may be a way to put a lynx link into a text file, but I
 don't know how it would be done.

There was some talk about a shell wrapper around lynx so that 'vote'
would  work again, but I'm not ambitious enough to figure it out right
now.
gelinas
response 81 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 9 01:03 UTC 2013

BTW, we weren't really down 24 hours, but I extended the voting period to the
end of 18 March anyway.  I should update the motd, I guess.
gelinas
response 82 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 22:16 UTC 2013

I'm still waiting for a certified list of voters.  A preliminary count shows
seven for and one against.  The proposal *probably* passed.
jep
response 83 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 20 02:08 UTC 2013

There is no hurry.  As long as it's resolved by the next election, that
will be fine.

Thanks, Joe!
gelinas
response 84 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 22 00:41 UTC 2013

I now have the list of members.  All but two of the votes were cast by
members.  The only NO vote was cast by a member.  So the members voted five
for and one against, which is more than the three-fourths requried to pass an
amendment to the by-laws.  Accordingly, the by-laws have been amended to
remove the term limits on Directors.  Directors may now serve for as many
terms as they can convince the members to elect them to.
denise
response 85 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 22 03:03 UTC 2013

Thanks, Joe!
mary
response 86 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 22 20:36 UTC 2013

The files have been updated to reflect this change to the bylaws.  If someone
could please edit the web link to access:

/cyberspace/grex/docs/archives/bylaws/bylaws.v9
kentn
response 87 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 12:33 UTC 2013

Thanks, Mary.  I'll update the link.
lkjh
response 88 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 20:57 UTC 2013

tnx gelinas and mary and kentn.
kentn
response 89 of 91: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 21:16 UTC 2013

All the links and files that I could find that referred to the
previous version of the bylaws have been updated to refer to 
v9.  If I missed any, let me know.  You might need to update
your browser cache to find them, though.
jgelinas
response 90 of 91: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 03:42 UTC 2014

Could items 26 and 325 (old versions of the bylaws) be retired? cmcgee
retired  item 2 when 26 was entered.

Resigning to be re-elected won't fix the staggered problem: a vacancy is
 filled for the remainder of the original term, not for a new term.

It's going to take some actual work to break the board into two classes.
:(
kentn
response 91 of 91: Mark Unseen   Nov 22 21:01 UTC 2014

Items 26 and 325 have been retired.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   52-76   77-91      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss