|
Grex > Femme > #74: Help! I'm Melting.....! (long diatribe) |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 200 responses total. |
mta
|
|
response 75 of 200:
|
Jan 8 22:55 UTC 1998 |
Mark, I guess I *have* met someone who can get away with sweatpants. ;)
I'd never notoced that that's what you were wearing.
I guess I only notice when they're dirty and grungy or ill-fitting, which is
lamentably frequent.
(But don't mind me, anyway. I miss the days when there were more
opportunities to wear evening wear and tuxedos. The casual look is, in my
opinion, carried too far these days. It's just me. I don't judge individual
people by it, though. I just think the culture at large is missing out.)
|
valerie
|
|
response 76 of 200:
|
Jan 9 06:05 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
clees
|
|
response 77 of 200:
|
Jan 9 12:54 UTC 1998 |
It all comes down to this:
if it fits well, and you feel comfortable in it, it shows.
So, even my suits are based on this principle and overrules things like
corporate-ness.
IOW: they look great on me.
Can anybody tell my the historical purpose of a tie (cravatte)?
|
mta
|
|
response 78 of 200:
|
Jan 9 19:30 UTC 1998 |
Valerie, I'm all for *comfortable clothes -- as evidenced by what I wear most
of the time. I don't have anything at all against T-shirts and agree that
they look fine on a lot of people. It's the growing acceptability of sloppy,
dirty clothes that depresses me.
To me, for instance, you always look "dressed". Not formal, not fussy,
definitely comfortable -- but with some attention to shapes and colours that
suit *you*.
Mark, too, is generally tidy looking and wears well fitting, clean clothes
and looks good.
*sigh* I guess this isn't coming out very coherently. Perhaps it will help
to put it this way: in the older times (20's, 30's 40's -- probably lots of
other times I'm not well versed in) people made some attempt to optimize their
appearance. Poor people who couldn't afford nice new clothes still tried to
make sure that their clothes were clean, pressed, and mended. Today it's
sometimes hard to tell students from housewives, from street people. Folks
with no way to keep their clothes (and bodies) clean have every reason to
dress that way -- what what's with the "poverty chic" we see even in
magazines? I don't get it. I'm not sayoing go back to neckties and cosets.
I'm saying that it would be nice if it was more common to "dress up a little"
by pairing clean jeans and T-shirts with a blazer and combed hair when going
out to dinner. To take a little pride in how we look. That's all.
It seems to me that humans are by nature influenced by how we and the people
around us look and by what attention we give ourselves. I think that part
of the increase in depression may be that we asa culture put all together too
much attention on the wrong things. We starve ourselves into unnatural shapes
and then either force ourselves into unflattering, uncomfortable 'dress"
clothes when we have to, or wear clothes that make us feel unattractive the
rest of the time.
I'm not proposing any specific "look", just some care and attention. I agree
with Clees that if you feel good in what you wear, you look good, and your
feel better about yourself. And even as we accept more and more "casual"
clothes in more and more situations, we still tend to judge ourselves and
others on how we all look, so that fewer and fewer people are satisfied with
their looks, and more and more people struggle to attain some mythical
'perfect body" in an atempt to feel good about themselves.
What if it were OK to dress up a little more just because we felt like it.
What if people started being more judged by attainable standards like "a way
with clothes", good grooming, a pleasant disposition, intelligence, a good
work ethic, and so on? Might we not feel less pressured, and ultimately
doomed to failure, in trying to attain (or refusing to try for) the mythical
ideal "hardbody"? As a recent ad says, there are 3 billion women who don't
look like supermodels and only 8 that do. Wouldn't we all be happier if
"looking our best" was the goal and "looking like a supermodel" was less
important?
Actually, valerie, you suit my picture of what we all ought to be shooting
for. You're a lovely woman and your style says "I'm happy with who I am and
how I look". A woman in tattered sweats and uncombed hair looks like she's
saying "I'll never look like I want to look, so what's the point in trying?"
That looks like depression. maybe she's just been painting the house and is
running out for anoher gallon of paint. I certainly don't think thatin that
case she's inappropriately dressed and I wouldn't want to go back to a culture
that says she has to shower, fix her manicure, and dress to the nines for that
errand. I'm just saying that if she's always dressed that way it probably
brings her down and with enough of us fitting that model, it brings all of
us down.
I guess I'm more shallow thatn I'd hoped. But I still think it matters.
I think the hard stuff that matters more is easier to attain when you feel
good about yourself, and in a culture as looks oriented as ours, how you
present yourself can't help but influence how you feel about yourself.
/soapbox=off
|
anderyn
|
|
response 79 of 200:
|
Jan 9 20:49 UTC 1998 |
I've always felt that being neat and tidy is important, particularly since
I am defined as obese in our society. I would NEVER wear sweats except
when exercising (though I did buy a cute kitty sweatshirt to wear to work for
this winter), and I don't ever wear polyester pants, etc. I will usually be
found in a skirt and shirt with vest/sweater/blazer or jeans and a nice shirt,
though I do still wear teeshirts. I also have never worn leggings, simply
because I don't think a large person would look good in them. I have been
working on expanding my wardrobe to items that are "classic" and look good
on me, and making sure that whatever I wear fits and feels good and looks the
best I can make it.
|
aruba
|
|
response 80 of 200:
|
Jan 9 23:24 UTC 1998 |
Rather than have people pay more attention to their appearances, I would
propose that they less attention to others'.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 81 of 200:
|
Jan 10 03:24 UTC 1998 |
Well, the fact is that you _do_ judge people by their appearance on first
glance. Everyone does, try as they might to counter it. It's just as much
a part of that initial impression as anything else, and it's a fairly reliable
way to judge what sort of person they are.
|
aruba
|
|
response 82 of 200:
|
Jan 10 05:34 UTC 1998 |
It's not reliable at all. Nor is making such judgements anything to be proud
of. I'm not going to claim I'm immune to appearances, but I do my darndest to
ignore them, and I think I mostly succeed.
(There should have been a "pay" between "they" and "less" in #80.)
|
scg
|
|
response 83 of 200:
|
Jan 10 08:29 UTC 1998 |
I tend to wear whatever I have that is clean, and generally not pay too much
attention to my appearance, because it generally doesn't seem all that worth
messing with to me. I sit in an office and play with a computer. My
in person contact with customers is pretty minimal. Besides, whenever I see
a person with a job like mine who is dressed up all the time, I tend to start
wondering whether they're more concerned with their appearance than whether
stuff works.
On the other hand, if I see a sales person who wears jeans and a t shirt to
meetings with customers, it does get me wondering a bit. Perhaps its because
it just seems normal for sales people to dress up, or perhaps it's because
appearance does seem to me to be part of a sales person's job. Or perhaps
I'm just being way too judgemental.
|
mary
|
|
response 84 of 200:
|
Jan 10 15:05 UTC 1998 |
I agree with Mark.
I enjoy buying and wearing comfortable and fun clothes
but I pay almost no attention to what others are wearing. It's
not important. What someone is wearing isn't useful in telling
me what I'd like to know.
Now, I can be judgemental with the best of 'em, but I simply
wait until someone opens their mouth. ;-)
|
mta
|
|
response 85 of 200:
|
Jan 10 21:40 UTC 1998 |
I dunno. There's a big difference between saying something ought to be true
and saying it *is* true.
I thought appearance made no difference until I bought my first suit as I
graduated from college. Before then I'd been a poor welfare mom and student.
My clothes were clean, but old and worn. And sometimes not very well fitting.
There just wasn't money to replace things as I needed to -- and I accepted
clothes from where I could get them.
When I put on my first suit and went out in public I could *believe* how much
difference it made in how pwople treated me! So much for "looks don't
matter".
And I think *everyone* judges people on their presentation at least to some
extent. Let me give you an example:
You walk into a very crowded cafeteria. You don't have the option of eating
lter or taking your food elsewhere and you find only four seats available,
one at each of four tables. At each table sits a woman, all about the same
age as you are. Each seems to have just begun her meal.
At the first table is a woman in a conservative suit and pumps. Her hair is
caught up in a simple but tidy chignon. She's wearing subtle makeup if any.
At the second table is a woman in a very tight, eye-catching dress ans very
high heels. Her hair is painstaking done in a very fashionable 'do and she's
wearing heavy, but attractive makeup.
At the third table is a woman in a clean t-shirt and jeans. She's wearing
sensible shoes. Her hair is combed and hanging loose. She's wearing no
makeup as far as you can tell.
At the fouth table is a woman in bizarrly combined, season inappropriate
clothes that look rumpled, faded, and not entirely clean. Her hair seems not
to have been combed (or maybe even washed) very recently and her makeup looks
like yesterdays job, wandered.
You have no impression of who you'd most like to sit next to? It seems to
me that each of these women is broadcasting something about herself and her
lifestyle. Any one of us might very well choose a different table -- based
on what the woman's appearance tell us about what she might be like to chat
with for a half hour. We'll choose the person who, to us, is broadcasting
"I'm interesting." or maybe "I'm similar to you in outlook or lifestyle."
Warmth is only half the reason humans wear clothes. Information is the other
half.
That said, the largest percentage of my friends wouldn't be caught dead
wearing anything but jeans or work pants and a t-shirt and think that my
concern with appearance is quaint at best. But in Ann Arbor, that uniform
is the signal of the intellectual. It's still information.
I guess what I'm saying is that clothes send messages no matter what. It's
inevitable. I think that it's important to be aware of the message you send
-- and then any message is fine. And I reserve the right to be a little
thrilled when someones "message" is that spending time with me was important
enough to take a little care in getting ready. I don't demand it. I don't
even expect it. But I still feel honoured when it happens and always will.
|
valerie
|
|
response 86 of 200:
|
Jan 10 22:29 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 87 of 200:
|
Jan 11 00:47 UTC 1998 |
I dunno. I do notice what people are wearing, particularly people I've known
forever (e.g., and in particular, my office mates). Of course, this usually
takes the form of saying, "Gosh, that looks nice on you!". I also assess
whether or not I'd be caught dead in a certain outfit if I found one that
fit, or if the person is of a similar size to myself. This is why I have
decided that I will never wear leggings. I have seen too many people of
a similar size who look horrible. Jeans and a tee shirt may not be the
best choice, but it at least looks neat and tidy for the most part.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 88 of 200:
|
Jan 11 03:13 UTC 1998 |
I'll grant you that I try not to let people's clothing rule my impressions
of them. However, it is a useful tool to determine what sort of person they
are. If I were in the situation Misti describes, of course I'd use clothing
to determine who I sat next to - I wouldn't have much else to base that
decision on, and clothing tends to be a fairly accurate indicator of what a
person is like.
Okay, that's going a bit too far, even. I mean, it's not like I'm going to
judge your value as a person on how well you dress. But, if I see someone
wearing quirky, interesting clothes, I'm going to assume a similarly quirky
personality; if I see someone wearing stylish, tasteful clothes, I'm going
to assume they have a similar sense of style, manners, and taste in the rest
of their life; if I see someone wearing ultra-trendy clothes, I'm going to
assume they are a follower of trends in other areas as well. And yes, if I
see someone in sloppy or casual clothing, I'm going to assume they have a
similarly casual attitude, but I'm not going to think any less of them for
that.
|
beeswing
|
|
response 89 of 200:
|
Jan 11 06:29 UTC 1998 |
I always notice what people wear. I cannot help it. Particularly if it's
unflattering... I just think "Oh honey, you don't need to be wearing that!".
But I would never tell a person that, unless they asked me. Like last week I
saw a middle-aged woman in a black shirt and these brightly colored, snug
leggings. But she was rather bottom-heavy, and the bright pants made you focus
on her butt. (I am bottom heavy myself and make sure I wear stuff that is
flattering, I sure as hell don't want to accentuate it). It looked ridiculous
on her, and I couldn't imagine how she could look in the mirror and think she
looked good in such an outfit. It's like wishing your feet were smaller, so you
buy smaller shoes. But your feet ache when you walk! Better to accept the size
you have and buy things that fit accordingly. Yes I'd like to wear halter tops,
but I look horrible in them and thus feel unconfident in them. So I don't buy
them.
I agree with Misti. I am so tired of seeing people throw on whatever's there
and go out. On Saturdays, I wear a sweater and jeans. But the jeans do not have
holes or rips, nor are they tight or those baggy things that hang on your butt.
To me when a person is dressed sloppily, I wonder if they just don't care what
they look like or what, or if maybe that is all they have. I also think
depression... the effort of getting dressed well is just too much. (And one
sign of suicidal ideation or depression is when a person neglects to groom
themselves, especially on basic levels like brushing teeth).
I'm ME, I'm special, and not just any old scrap of clothes will do for me. You
can look nice without having to put on a suit or dress and heels. I for one
loathe heels.
Like Misti said, it's not as much the price of the clothes as much as you
maintain them. T-shirt and jeans? Fine. But tuck in the shirt, make sure the
jeans are clean and not shredded. Comb your hair. I really don't notice a
person's exact clothes as much as the person just looking nice. Accessories
show attention to detail. Yes it's wrong to judge people by how they
dress/look, but that is how it is. If that weren't so, you'd show up at an
interview in sweats.
|
beeswing
|
|
response 90 of 200:
|
Jan 11 06:35 UTC 1998 |
... Oh and then there's makeup. I LOVE makeup, it's just fun to reinvent
yourself and see the possibilities. But I don't wear much. A lot of times I
don't feel like putting on a whole face full. And unless I'm broken out, I
don't do much. A little foundation to even out redness, concealer to cover
zits, powder, eyeliner, mascara, blush and lipstick. Takes maybe 5 to 10
minutes.
I look pretty washed out without it. I guess it's like window dressing.
I'd never go out with nothing on... if anything, just mascara and lipstick. I
think guys like a gal with a little color to her face, just to accentuate the
positive. It's unanimous that people don't like that Tammy Faye cakey crap.
That much makeup, to me, symbolizes insecurity.
And I am curious, just what do guys think of makeup?
|
omni
|
|
response 91 of 200:
|
Jan 11 08:47 UTC 1998 |
I don't like seeing women in a lot of makeup. I believe in the natural
look, because that says to me "I accept myself for who I am and I am not
afraid to show it".
I really hate the blue eyelids and the heavy lipstick that looks like it
goes out of the lipline. To me, that's a trashy look.
Personally, I find a little lipstick and a little pinch on my cheeks to
give them color to be enough for me. After all, Mother taught us that only
whores use rouge. Nice girls pinch. ;)
|
valerie
|
|
response 92 of 200:
|
Jan 11 15:06 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
scg
|
|
response 93 of 200:
|
Jan 11 17:49 UTC 1998 |
I've always thought makeup looked a bit rediculous. I probably don't notice
it a lot of the time, but I've certainly never struck me as at all bad that
somebody wasn't wearing it. If somebody is wearing makeup, I generally assume
that they must be pretty insecure.
On most of these clothing issues, I think I have about the oposite opinion
from beeswing. Sure, if somebody hasn't taken a shower or brushed their teeth
recently, or smells bad, it seems pretty gross. Beyond that, it really
doesn't matter to me that much. I tend to grab whatever is clean and put it
on. That's not insecurity, as beeswing suggests. It's just that I don't
consider it to be very important. I do find myself wondering how insecure
somebody must be if they think what their clothes look like is actually
important.
|
scg
|
|
response 94 of 200:
|
Jan 11 17:51 UTC 1998 |
That said, I know some people who actually like getting dressed up and paying
attention to their clothes. If they actually like it, that's cool. It seems
to me that there's a big difference between somebody doing something because
they like to, and somebody doing something because they think nobody will like
them if they don't.
|
beeswing
|
|
response 95 of 200:
|
Jan 11 20:15 UTC 1998 |
Hmmmm... I think of it more as a pride aspect. I'm special, so I want to look
special, or at least like it matters to me. I was brought up to think that way.
I said a lot of MAKEUP is a sign of insecurity, not lack of dressing up. And
I'm sure Steve doesn't have the makeup issue to deal with. :)
I also hate blue eyeshadow and lipstick outside the natural lip line. Any
eyeshadow I wear is subtle and very light, and only serves to enhance my eye
color and make them look bigger. I love big, expressive eyes. I don't like
obvious eye makeup, because then people notice your makeup and not your eyes
themselves. I need blush to warm up my very pale cheeks... people have asked me
if I have the flu when I wasn't wearing it. But I hate those racing-stripe
slashes that some women glop on their face. I like powder because my nose is
sooo shiny, and the paleness factor. But I'd never wear brozing cream or
anything to make me look darker all over... it would look ridiculously fake.
As for tanning beds, there's a reason I call 'em Cancer Beds. No thanks.
|
valerie
|
|
response 96 of 200:
|
Jan 11 20:31 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
valerie
|
|
response 97 of 200:
|
Jan 11 20:33 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
aruba
|
|
response 98 of 200:
|
Jan 12 02:20 UTC 1998 |
Frankly, keeping warm and a degree of modesty (and certain indecent exposure
laws) *are* the only reasons I wear clothes. Oh, and having pockets.
(Geez - 13 new responses since yesterday!)
Misti, your example of picking a table to sit at seems contrived in that the
*only* information you have about the women in question is what they're
wearing. Plus you only have a few seconds to make a decision, when you're
standing there waiting to sit down, and people are jostling you. I think I
would pick the table that was closest to where I was standing, to minimize the
risk that I might drop my lunch tray in the process of getting there.
Tricia, there's no question that a lot of people judge others by their
clothes, and that is indeed why I would be careful about what I wore to a job
interview - since the whole point of that situation is for people to make
judgements of others. I don't think that's the point of most situations,
however, at least not for me. So I don't worry about clothes the rest of the
time.
(Actually, I think the next time I go for an interview I'm not going to wear a
tie. I don't want to work for a place that thinks that's important. I
reserve the right to change my mind about that, though, if I need money badly
enough. :))
Frankly, I have enough self-worth that I would not value the opinion of
someone who would judge me by my clothes, anyway.
|
i
|
|
response 99 of 200:
|
Jan 12 03:46 UTC 1998 |
I get the impression of a bunch of mini-cultural gulfs here, with people
on the opposite sides saying stuff like "why would anyone care" and "there
must be something wrong with you if you don't care". That i'd feel more
at home with a vi vs. emacs discussion probably lets you figure out where
i stand...
On clothes, i figure that dressing up is better than a prostate exam.
Usually. Jeans 7 days a week is my choice, along with sweat socks and
a casual top - usually a knit shirt in summer, or a turtleneck (tucked
in) and flannel button-down (untucked) over it in winter. I find that
i don't judge people by their clothes at work, but do away from work
(where i figure the-less-like-me the worse).
On the odor front, i don't wear anything and generally don't notice
what anyone else is wearing, but maybe that's because hayfever, etc.
keep my nose semi-functional most of the time. War stories told by
those allergic to perfume have made me somethat biased against such.
I don't like pierced ears or earrings, but have mostly gotten resigned
to them as unavoidable. Though it's depressed me to see each of my
nieces in turn succumb to peer pressure and do it. The newer piercings,
though, REALLY turn me off.
For makeup, i'm probably in valerie's "great unaware" category. If i
notice it, i don't like it. I'm sort of philosophically opposed to
it, but if it's someone else's face, money, and time....their business,
not mine.
|