|
Grex > Agora56 > #31: It is time to get the hell OUT of Iraq! | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 133 responses total. |
i
|
|
response 75 of 133:
| 
Jan 10 00:48 UTC 2006 |
Hasn't there been a years-long scandal over the lack of decent body armor
for many of our troops in Iraq, complete with a no-bid contract going to
a very-well-connected businessman...who had never actually done anything
resembling large-scale manufacturing, and never managed to ship anything,
but plenty of our boys died for lack of any protection while Mr. Connected
was wasting time, foot-dragging by highly-placed chickenhawks who seemed
worried that rushing in armor to reduce the the number of mere US soldiers
maimed & killed might reflect badly on their august selves, etc.?
|
scholar
|
|
response 76 of 133:
|
Jan 10 03:14 UTC 2006 |
WHOA< CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN WHY MY PACKAGE IS OUT OF CUSTOMS AND>>> BACK IN
NEVADA?!
WHAT THE FUCK>
I"M CONFUSED > :(
|
naftee
|
|
response 77 of 133:
|
Jan 10 05:00 UTC 2006 |
what !
oh no :(
A BOOMERANG PACKAGE
|
scholar
|
|
response 78 of 133:
|
Jan 10 07:50 UTC 2006 |
WHOA!
NOW IT"S IN MEMPHIS?!
HOW ODD>
|
scholar
|
|
response 79 of 133:
|
Jan 10 13:08 UTC 2006 |
whoa!
it seems to be back in mississauga?!
|
tod
|
|
response 80 of 133:
|
Jan 10 16:53 UTC 2006 |
Your flashlight is a slut and making the rounds.
|
scholar
|
|
response 81 of 133:
|
Jan 10 18:59 UTC 2006 |
:(
|
naftee
|
|
response 82 of 133:
|
Jan 10 21:30 UTC 2006 |
:(
|
scholar
|
|
response 83 of 133:
|
Jan 11 15:16 UTC 2006 |
whoa!
it got here!
|
scholar
|
|
response 84 of 133:
|
Jan 11 23:53 UTC 2006 |
whoa!
it's awfully pleasurable!
|
mcnally
|
|
response 85 of 133:
|
Jan 11 23:59 UTC 2006 |
And yet, when people tell you to "get a life", I doubt this is what they
have in mind..
|
scholar
|
|
response 86 of 133:
|
Jan 12 00:06 UTC 2006 |
what!
|
naftee
|
|
response 87 of 133:
|
Jan 12 05:29 UTC 2006 |
re 84
TELL US HOW GOOD
|
tod
|
|
response 88 of 133:
|
Jan 12 07:41 UTC 2006 |
He's gotta put WD40 on it first.
It's like banging porkchop with a hole in it.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 89 of 133:
|
Feb 24 18:35 UTC 2006 |
It has occurred to me that the time is coming when it would make sense (to
them) for Iran to invade Iraq to "restore order". Iran could easily put a
half-million invasion force into Iraq with hardly any resistance. They'd
probably succeed in restoring order too. The small US contingent would be
overrun (and probably even fought by the native Shiites).
|
tod
|
|
response 90 of 133:
|
Feb 24 18:40 UTC 2006 |
re #89
What nutjob would do that with GW in charge over here?
|
happyboy
|
|
response 91 of 133:
|
Feb 24 18:44 UTC 2006 |
THEIR nutjob. hey know what's really cool?
they BOTH have god on their side!
it's like god is hedgeing his bets!!!
|
tod
|
|
response 92 of 133:
|
Feb 24 18:47 UTC 2006 |
Allanis Morrisette comes out in the finale
|
happyboy
|
|
response 93 of 133:
|
Feb 24 19:13 UTC 2006 |
does she contribute to the gw boosh presidential library like
the royal family of dubai?
|
tod
|
|
response 94 of 133:
|
Feb 24 19:26 UTC 2006 |
The Spice
|
cross
|
|
response 95 of 133:
|
Feb 25 04:57 UTC 2006 |
This response has been erased.
|
bru
|
|
response 96 of 133:
|
Feb 26 02:15 UTC 2006 |
I doubt the Iranians would be able to take out the americans in Iraq.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 97 of 133:
|
Feb 26 03:14 UTC 2006 |
The Americans are ready to fight the a joint force of Iranians and Iraqis?
Lots of Iraqis want the Americans out and if the Iranians make that their
only goal, they will have vast support. "Relieve Iraq of the
Americans" can be their rallying cry.
|
cross
|
|
response 98 of 133:
|
Feb 26 06:16 UTC 2006 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 99 of 133:
|
Feb 26 06:20 UTC 2006 |
The Iranians wouldn't be attacking the Iraqis, they would be attacking us.
And how will we look fighting to retain *our* control of Iraq, while
killing numerous Iraqis "defending their country"?
|