You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-87       
 
Author Message
13 new of 87 responses total.
krj
response 75 of 87: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 06:43 UTC 2001

(The Slashdot coverage has a bit more on the network architecture, if 
you dig down through the responses.)
krj
response 76 of 87: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 20:39 UTC 2001

Marcus in resp:70 :: the phrasing of the Financial Times article was 
a little difficult to parse, but on closer reading I think the 
IFPI is arguing that half of all blank CD-R production, estimated
at 4.8 billion discs for 2001, ends up being used for music.

From the IFPI's perspective, discs copied and sold in the great 
pirate bazaars of Asia are no different than the home-made copies 
made in the west; the article flows pretty freely between home copying
and commercial piracy for profit.

-----

News reports almost everywhere that Real Network was supposed to take
their MusicNet system for legitimate music downloads online today.
krj
response 77 of 87: Mark Unseen   Dec 11 04:08 UTC 2001

Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig on how current trends in 
copyright law are a threat to culture and to technological 
innovation:

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,48625,00.html
"Why Copyright Laws Hurt Culture"

Rane will love it.  :)

(As a related digression: I've had a friend argue recently that the 
DMCA's ban on reverse engineering, if it was in force in the early 1980s, 
would have killed the development of the PC industry by prohibiting 
the reverse-engineering of the BIOS which was required to create 
low-cost industry-standard PCs.  Thoughts?)

----------

The LA Times reports that numerous artists are having their lawyers 
attack the record industry's legitimate download service MusicNet.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-000098124dec10.story

The artists in question think the record business is running over 
their rights, much as the record companies claim to have been 
treated by Napster and its successors.

((krj note: once again, more evidence that nothing is going to happen
in the legally-sanctioned online music sales arena until Congress 
sets mechanical royalties, as they did in the radio and record era
many years ago.))

gull
response 78 of 87: Mark Unseen   Dec 11 04:20 UTC 2001

Re #77: I think it'd be a stretch to call the BIOS a copy-protection 
technology.
mcnally
response 79 of 87: Mark Unseen   Dec 11 15:02 UTC 2001

  Facetious or not, it's the sort of thing the DMCA *was* designed to
  prevent..
krj
response 80 of 87: Mark Unseen   Dec 18 06:30 UTC 2001

Not directly related to Napster or related subjects, but: 
http://www.newmediamusic.com, a web site which I have referred 
to frequently in these items, has closed up shop.  The web site
is still there, frozen as of mid-November.  
 
NewMediaMusic wanted to be a trade journal for the next round 
of evolution in the music business.  While they were critical of 
Napster and similar systems for their lack of respect for copyrights, 
NMM's editors also tried to take a stick to the major music companies
for sticking their heads in the sand and overlooking what their
customers clearly wanted.   Sometimes their essays seemed utterly 
brilliant, and other times they just seemed to be blowing smoke.

But they were a fun journal, and I will miss them.
 
----------

We knew that mp3.com had been bought by Vivendi Universal, the world's
largest music company, some months back.  I think Vivendi just finished
digesting its purchase.  The http://www.mp3.com/news pages, usually 
pointers  to a lively mix of rubbish and hype and good articles, have 
been frozen for four days.  The mp3.com front page is now promoting
major label R&B artist Toni Braxton. I guess we'll see where 
it goes from here.   (In their continuing attempt to devour
the entire media universe, Vivendi just bought the USA family of 
cable TV networks, including the SciFi channel.)

----------

Salon has a couple of freebies; I don't read them as much as I used to 
since most of the content is now for subscribers only.
 
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2001/12/13/college_webcast/index.html?x
"Why College Radio Fears the DMCA"
 
The DMCA created a new performance right which Internet radio stations
are to start paying for, a right which over-the-air stations don't 
have to worry about.   The sample station, a college non-profit, 
currently pays $623/year in songwriting royalties but would pay 
$10,000-$20,000/year if the record industry has its way. 
 
KRJ's interpretation, as noted before: the new digital performance
rights means that there will be no small webcast operations, and 
indeed there may not be any webcast operations at all other than 
those owned by the record industry, which can pay itself for its
own rights.

http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2001/12/18/dont_steal_music/index.html
"Don't Steal Music, Pretty Please"

I'm not sure I agree with this one.  The author argues that the music 
industry is coming to terms with the rise of the MP3 file and that all 
the anti-MP3 combat is just a delaying action while the biz figures
out what their cash flow model will be.  
krj
response 81 of 87: Mark Unseen   Dec 18 22:43 UTC 2001

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,49201,00.html

Declan McCullagh quotes Jack Valenti of the MPAA.  Valenti says flatly
that if the electronics industry does not voluntarily implement the 
SSSCA, Congress will move next year to enact the legislation
requiring anticopying systems in all consumer electronics.
krj
response 82 of 87: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 14:45 UTC 2001

Universal Music Group launches their Pressplay service for 
legitimate, tightly-controlled downloadable music files.
The article includes pricing information.  Pressplay allows you 
to burn a sharply limited number of files to CD (in what format?)
if you buy one of the pricier subscriptions.   But downloading to 
those very popular portable MP3 players is not allowed.

http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-8222920.html?tag=mn_hd

Universal has also distributed a copy-prevented CD in the US.
The disc is the soundtrack for the movie "The Fast and the Furious."
Universal is using the Midbar Technology "Cactus Data Shield," 
which attempts to prevent the CD audio from being played on any
computer.  The disc also includes a digital audio player which 
allows controlled playing of MP3-like versions of the songs on 
a computer; however, these MP3-like files will not play in the 
common media players, and this is a Windows-only proposition.

http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-8225543.html?tag=mn_hd
krj
response 83 of 87: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 14:54 UTC 2001

Pressplay is offering a 14-day free trial if anyone is feeling adventurous.
http://www.pressplay.com
krj
response 84 of 87: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 23:16 UTC 2001

A good, fairly neutral & non-technical article on the Universal Music
Group introduction of copy prevention was pointed to by Slashdot:
 
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/svfront/cd121701.htm

The article reminds me that the "Cactus Data Shield" discs are 
supposed to fail in the new dual-purpose DVD/CD machines, which 
were reviewed in a big roundup in Consumer Reports.  Uh-oh...
tpryan
response 85 of 87: Mark Unseen   Dec 20 19:15 UTC 2001

re 84           Since those are likely to have digital outputs?
krj
response 86 of 87: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 21:54 UTC 2002

View hidden response.

krj
response 87 of 87: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 21:56 UTC 2002

(oops, Agora rolled, time to start another one of these linked items...)
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-87       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss