You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-81       
 
Author Message
7 new of 81 responses total.
mynxcat
response 75 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 4 16:41 UTC 2003

Robin Williams as in the comedian?

Never seen his stand-up, so can't comment on the cleverness
goose
response 76 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 10 19:51 UTC 2003

Not Robin Williams:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/williams.asp
sj2
response 77 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 08:39 UTC 2003

Sorry, I was away. Let me clarify a few things first.

I am NOT some uppity foreigner for I NEVER claimed any higher moral 
ground. I DO NOT claim that India in anyway is morally superior to any 
other country in the world or that the US is in any way morally 
inferior to any other country in the world. Each country pursues a 
foreign policy that serves its interests best. I am told that is a 
basic tenet of diplomacy and foreign policy.

I also DO NOT claim that we do not have a significant mess to clear at 
home. However, I fail to see what does that have to do with the US's 
failings?? 

Further, I did NOT refuse to discuss India's failings. I merely asked 
for a separate post (which Dan ignored) so that there is clarity in 
arguing. Start a thread called "India's failings" and you will see 
plenty of posts from me. 

Dan - RUPE's facts are corroborated. Look at the references at the end 
of the report. They are drawn from various independant media and 
government sources. 
mcnally
response 78 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 21 19:19 UTC 2003

  (BTW, my use of the deliberately provocative phrase "uppity foreigners"
  in #32 was intended to underscore what I considered the offensively
  partronizing nature of the posts I was responding to by pointing out
  just how rude the sentiment was, not to indicate that that is how I feel.
  Judging by most of the responses which followed (#33 excepted) I think
  the term was widely read the way I intended it but its reappearance in
  #77 makes me wonder if sj2 realizes that that was a sarcastic dig at
  Dan Cross's sentiments and not a poke at sj2.)
sj2
response 79 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 22 06:48 UTC 2003

Ummm .... I might have missed the sarcasm due to either or all of the 
undermentioned:
1. I am slow ;-)
2. Cultural difference 
3. English isn't my native language
4. The medium doesn't allow for body language, facial expressions or 
tone of the voice to be judged.

I am more inclined towards 1 & 4 :D

offensively partronizing nature of the posts?? Rude sentiments??

mcnally
response 80 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 22 07:35 UTC 2003

  I realize it's a lot harder to pick up on sarcasm in a text-only
  forum, particularly when the conversation is not in your native
  language.  That's why I thought I should clarify..
sj2
response 81 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 22 07:42 UTC 2003

Appreciate the thought and the effort.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-81       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss