|
Grex > Agora41 > #109: A newer, better term for grexers. | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 21 new of 95 responses total. |
oval
|
|
response 75 of 95:
|
May 1 00:26 UTC 2002 |
plus it's SO TAXABLE!
|
brighn
|
|
response 76 of 95:
|
May 1 02:52 UTC 2002 |
#74> Except innocent people don't get their homes broken into by cops
suspicious that they're speeding.
|
pthomas
|
|
response 77 of 95:
|
May 1 05:22 UTC 2002 |
74: That's because people in the "middle" don't really stop and think
about what drug laws do to this country. They don't do drugs themselves as
a general rule, and when their kid does it they don't like it. The key, of
course, is to raise awareness about what the drug war is doing and the
fact that legalisation would not be the terrible thing most people think
it would be.
|
gull
|
|
response 78 of 95:
|
May 1 13:00 UTC 2002 |
Eventually I think it won't matter whether drugs are legal or not, because
you won't be able to get a job if you test positive for using them. (I do
think it's a bit hypocritical that businesses will tolerate people who
repeatedly come in hung over from drinking binges, but will immediately fire
anyone who tests positive for using pot.)
|
slynne
|
|
response 79 of 95:
|
May 1 13:58 UTC 2002 |
I dont really see that happening. Oh sure some companies do drug tests
upon hire which isnt totally unreasonable. I mean, if you know you are
going to have a drug test, just stop smoking for a while. Although
marijuana can be detected for a long time in a urine test, the tests
that are commonly run really will only pick up pretty recent use (say
in the week before the test). Drug testing is bad for morale so
generally companies only use it after hire if an employee is having
problems (showing up late, calling in sick a lot, etc). They do have
drug tests when an accident happens though because if the accident was
because the person was high or drunk, they want to minimize their
liability.
|
flem
|
|
response 80 of 95:
|
May 1 14:05 UTC 2002 |
I wouldn't work for a company that asked me to take a drug test.
|
slynne
|
|
response 81 of 95:
|
May 1 14:28 UTC 2002 |
Exactly! And that is a pretty common feeling. Common enough that any
company that seriously did drug testing could have trouble finding
workers in a tight labor market.
|
gull
|
|
response 82 of 95:
|
May 1 14:49 UTC 2002 |
It doesn't matter what the companies themselves think if all the insurance
companies start requiring it.
|
flem
|
|
response 83 of 95:
|
May 1 15:16 UTC 2002 |
...but if only *some* insurance companies start requiring it...
|
brighn
|
|
response 84 of 95:
|
May 1 16:15 UTC 2002 |
I understand drug testing for jobs where it matters, although there I might
also fire people for coming in drunk. I do computer work. Who am I going to
injure if I'm too high to work the keyboard correctly?
|
brighn
|
|
response 85 of 95:
|
May 1 16:15 UTC 2002 |
Actually, I understand it's partially an EEOC thing... if you hire someone
and they have a drug problem you could be obliged to pay for their treatment.
Is that EEOC or insurance, or what?
|
senna
|
|
response 86 of 95:
|
May 2 00:49 UTC 2002 |
At my job, you can corrupt medical records and register the wrong person, with
potentially lethal results.
Of course, a lot of companies have regulations about coming into work drunk,
sans the enforcement.
|
bru
|
|
response 87 of 95:
|
May 2 02:47 UTC 2002 |
most of thr jobs I have applied for in the last two months have required a
drug test.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 88 of 95:
|
May 2 10:56 UTC 2002 |
resp:70 I'm sorry, Bruce, but although your observation on modern
country and modern folk is fairly accurate, you have no idea what the
hell you're talking about.
Once upon a time, what was called country was pretty much what was
folk. I'd have to do a hell of a lot of research to pick out all that
was there, since I'm not a professional musicologist, but I'm assuming
it covered bluegrass and other Appalachian styles. To be quite
honest, "folk" is just a catch phrase for music of the masses.. any
cultural music that the common people sing and play.
I think quite a bit of this country was influenced by older Celtic
styles developed by the Scots and the Irish. Listen to their
contemporary music again sometime. They love country-western. Johnny
Cash was said by Bono to be so huge in Ireland, and that the people
can't believe he's not Irish (the comment being made when Cash was
featured on the Zooropa album).
Western was also a separate style. It was mostly cowboy ballads and
campfire songs as I understand it. They mostly sang about their dogs,
horses, the range, etc. http://lonehand.com/music.htm doesn't give a
thorough definition of what is western music, but it will point you to
plenty of definitive recordings.
http://www.pressroom.com/~okt/WesternSwing.html gives a definition of
western swing that was made famous by Bob Wills and his Texas
Playboys. Western swing traded licks with rhythm and blues even more
heavily when acts like Bill Haley and the Comets, and then Elvis
Presley became famous, which sound became part of what was to be
defined as rock and roll.
Country and western, though separate styles in recent history, were
eventually brought together. I have no idea where honky-tonk came
from, but again, I'm not really a musicologist.
damn, I should do this. A professor I had was so totally right.
|
brighn
|
|
response 89 of 95:
|
May 2 15:03 UTC 2002 |
#86> Ok, true, there are jobs in which computer work could prove lethal
(programming robots, medical fields, nuclear facilities). That's not case with
many computer jobs, if not most, though.
|
bru
|
|
response 90 of 95:
|
May 3 03:07 UTC 2002 |
well you obviously don't understand folk music, so it is a good thing you
aren't a musicologist.
WE have been having this discussion for as many years as I can remember.
What is folk music?
My wife, a professional writer adn reviewer of folk music, has asked this
question many a time, even of the professionals. Folk musicians have a wide
opinion on what folk music is. I will suggest she come in here and make a
comment if she so desires.
Lets go way back, back into time. Cave men, cave women, neanderthals!
opps! to far!
You can find the roots of folk music all over northern europe. It came her
with the immigrants, The Scots, the welsh, the Irish, the French, the English,
the Spanish, all have a similar heritage when it comes to "folk music".
Probably the nordic and the rus as well. Since I do not listen to the older
mediterainean musics, I won't venture to say if they also have a similar root
base.
I suppose you could look at the insturments used, and how they were used as
well. The violin, the harp, the drum, the bagpipes, the flute, the whistle
are all traditional insturments of "folk music".
Whether this can be linked to the Celtic influence or not is something to
speculate on. cajun music, country western music, the blues, and rock and
roll all show some influence of folk music.
My personal opinion is that it is a derivative of the Celtic culture, stronger
in some areaas, less so in others. It might be easier to say what is not folk
music.
African, indonesian, polynesian, chinese, japanese, indian, are not related
to what we traditionally refer to as folk music. Opera, rap, symphonic, jazz,
and techno are not folk music.
Where folk music and country split is harder to determine, but I will
repeat that most "folk" musicians are indeed liberal, and most "country"
musicians are indeed conservative. Once again, most does not mean all.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 91 of 95:
|
May 3 03:33 UTC 2002 |
Some time back, I noted that the music of Appalachia preserves a lot of Celtic
tradition from the late 18th century, just as Irish English preserves a lot
of English features from the late 16th century, features that have disappeared
from the mainstream of each.
|
edina
|
|
response 92 of 95:
|
May 3 13:31 UTC 2002 |
See here, "Songcatcher".
|
polykarp
|
|
response 93 of 95:
|
May 6 01:58 UTC 2002 |
You PC clones.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 94 of 95:
|
May 6 08:40 UTC 2002 |
resp:90 apparently not, and that's a much, much better explanation.
Thanks. Sorry if I acted like the fool, but that response sounds more
thought-out.. so 'folk' and 'country' apparently made a split.
Sometimes *I* have to say stupid things to get people to provide the
rest of the context. Sorry about that, but it worked.
btw, just because I don't understand folk music, it doesn't mean I
can't do the research, and you just apparently provided a *lot*.
|
janc
|
|
response 95 of 95:
|
May 18 01:39 UTC 2002 |
Um, the labels on different kinds of music are arbitrary
classifications assigned for marketing reasons. "If you'd like more
music that resembles this, look in this category." The influences
actually zig-zag all over the place. It would be impossible to
determine in any meaningful way what "split off" from what.
|