|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 1000 responses total. |
aa8ij
|
|
response 725 of 1000:
| 
Sep 11 00:13 UTC 1993 |
quake
|
chelsea
|
|
response 726 of 1000:
|
Sep 11 02:02 UTC 1993 |
route
|
srw
|
|
response 727 of 1000:
|
Sep 11 02:41 UTC 1993 |
shake 1 (rcurl)
quake 1 (aa8ij)
route 1 (chelsea)
|
rcurl
|
|
response 728 of 1000:
|
Sep 11 04:01 UTC 1993 |
three
|
srw
|
|
response 729 of 1000:
|
Sep 11 05:41 UTC 1993 |
three 1 (rcurl)
|
remmers
|
|
response 730 of 1000:
|
Sep 11 14:28 UTC 1993 |
elide
|
katie
|
|
response 731 of 1000:
|
Sep 11 15:40 UTC 1993 |
routs
|
rcurl
|
|
response 732 of 1000:
|
Sep 11 18:05 UTC 1993 |
glede
|
jdg
|
|
response 733 of 1000:
|
Sep 11 19:44 UTC 1993 |
tithe
|
srw
|
|
response 734 of 1000:
|
Sep 11 23:02 UTC 1993 |
elide 1 (remmers)
routs 0 (katie)
glede 1 (rcurl)
tithe 1 (jdg)
|
katie
|
|
response 735 of 1000:
|
Sep 11 23:46 UTC 1993 |
imbue
|
rcurl
|
|
response 736 of 1000:
|
Sep 12 00:26 UTC 1993 |
ochre
|
srw
|
|
response 737 of 1000:
|
Sep 12 05:21 UTC 1993 |
imbue 5 (katie) !! Congratulations !!
Oh well, it won't set any records. Katie got imbue on the 15th try.
You're up, katie.
|
srw
|
|
response 738 of 1000:
|
Sep 14 06:05 UTC 1993 |
Well, katie hasn't logged in since she asked "imbue" on Saturday night.
What do we do now?
(1) designate a new person to be it, or
(2) wait for katie, or
(3) end this game before we get to 1000
Opinions? Suggestions?
|
rcurl
|
|
response 739 of 1000:
|
Sep 14 12:39 UTC 1993 |
You were "it" most recently, Steve. Why don't you start another round,
while we wait for katie to announce her presence/absence. She could be
guest IT. This may result in our having two ITs, which would be
interesting ;-).
|
katie
|
|
response 740 of 1000:
|
Sep 14 17:10 UTC 1993 |
I'm here, and I'm thinking of a 5-letter word.
|
aa8ij
|
|
response 741 of 1000:
|
Sep 14 21:11 UTC 1993 |
micro
|
rcurl
|
|
response 742 of 1000:
|
Sep 15 00:51 UTC 1993 |
scope
|
chelsea
|
|
response 743 of 1000:
|
Sep 15 00:58 UTC 1993 |
types
|
rcurl
|
|
response 744 of 1000:
|
Sep 15 01:23 UTC 1993 |
quick
|
aa8ij
|
|
response 745 of 1000:
|
Sep 15 06:58 UTC 1993 |
hey that's 2 rcurl!!!
|
srw
|
|
response 746 of 1000:
|
Sep 15 07:09 UTC 1993 |
I've seen other people do that. It's permitted in the rules, since
they aren't in a row (types intervened). There's no rule to prevent
two tests by the same person before a response.
Would anyone like such a rule? I don't care much.
"heath"
|
rcurl
|
|
response 747 of 1000:
|
Sep 15 12:36 UTC 1993 |
The "rule" is, not two in *sequence* by the same person. The other "rule"
is, we have to stop guessing once the backlog reaches 5 - which it has,
so..I'm standing by. (So far, we have microscope, typesquick, and heath?????)
|
meg
|
|
response 748 of 1000:
|
Sep 16 16:36 UTC 1993 |
Ok, katie's out temporarily until I get around to replacing my mom's
monitor and video card, so she asked me to fill in.
Hopefully I understand the rules correctly. Assuming I do, then:
micro - aa8ij - 0
scope - rcurl - 2
types - chelsea - 0
quick - rcurl - 0
heath - srw - 0
|
meg
|
|
response 749 of 1000:
|
Sep 16 16:36 UTC 1993 |
(Yes, I know the word katie was thinking of)
|
