|
Grex > Coop13 > #25: Nominations for the 2004 Grex Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 225 responses total. |
davel
|
|
response 65 of 225:
| 
Oct 23 15:01 UTC 2003 |
Re 57: Do you have the rightful possession of the grexbat? Otherwise that's
not allowed.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 66 of 225:
|
Oct 23 15:41 UTC 2003 |
How about a trial of arms to whittle down the contestants? :p
|
jp2
|
|
response 67 of 225:
|
Oct 23 16:07 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 68 of 225:
|
Oct 23 17:08 UTC 2003 |
Nah. The idea behind elections is that they're peaceful substitutes
for such barbaric decision-making procedures.
But you knew that.
|
asddsa
|
|
response 69 of 225:
|
Oct 24 01:14 UTC 2003 |
re 61 But was it worth it?
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 70 of 225:
|
Oct 24 16:00 UTC 2003 |
Remmers takes the fun out of elections. No violence, no graft... *whines*
|
flem
|
|
response 71 of 225:
|
Oct 24 18:38 UTC 2003 |
Can I vote for the purple pixies?
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 72 of 225:
|
Oct 24 18:49 UTC 2003 |
Thanks for the nomination keesan. However, I will have to decline. I
have too much scheduled to happen next year, and don't feel I could do
the board justice at this point. However, I would consider running
next year.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 73 of 225:
|
Oct 24 18:49 UTC 2003 |
Only if they accept the nomination.
|
remmers
|
|
response 74 of 225:
|
Oct 24 20:04 UTC 2003 |
...And pay their dues.
|
purpixie
|
|
response 75 of 225:
|
Oct 24 20:16 UTC 2003 |
We declare our intention to run for Grex Board! Vote for us!! Yay!
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 76 of 225:
|
Oct 24 20:34 UTC 2003 |
I second the Purple Pixies, but only if they've paid their dues.
|
asddsa
|
|
response 77 of 225:
|
Oct 25 05:47 UTC 2003 |
I third the Purple Pixies, but only if they support NextGreX.
|
davel
|
|
response 78 of 225:
|
Oct 25 13:39 UTC 2003 |
They also have to provide acceptable identification.
|
remmers
|
|
response 79 of 225:
|
Oct 26 15:03 UTC 2003 |
But if they can meet those requirements - sure, why not?
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 80 of 225:
|
Oct 28 19:18 UTC 2003 |
Hey, I came up with the purple pixies. Gimme that login!!!!!
|
tsty
|
|
response 81 of 225:
|
Nov 8 09:12 UTC 2003 |
it'snot yo alerady? hmmmmmmmmmmm ......
|
naftee
|
|
response 82 of 225:
|
Nov 9 05:15 UTC 2003 |
Snot
|
willcome
|
|
response 83 of 225:
|
Nov 9 21:39 UTC 2003 |
I nominate naftee.
|
naftee
|
|
response 84 of 225:
|
Nov 10 01:21 UTC 2003 |
Ooodoyou?
|
remmers
|
|
response 85 of 225:
|
Nov 10 16:50 UTC 2003 |
REMINDER: Nominations close on November 15.
Nominees have until the start of the election on December 1 to decide
whether to run. At this point, several people have been nominated who
have neither accepted nor declined.
|
mary
|
|
response 86 of 225:
|
Nov 10 17:49 UTC 2003 |
I'd like to nominate Steve Weiss (srw) for the board.
Too, there must be people out there interested and willing
to serve a term or two. Please don't wait for someone to
think of you as a candidate, just jump in and volunteer
yourself as a candidate. Being nominated isn't necessary.
|
glenda
|
|
response 87 of 225:
|
Nov 10 18:02 UTC 2003 |
My winter semester schedule has (mostly) been determined. I hereby accept
nomination.
|
mary
|
|
response 88 of 225:
|
Nov 10 21:35 UTC 2003 |
Yeah!
|
bhoward
|
|
response 89 of 225:
|
Nov 10 23:52 UTC 2003 |
Just a quick question for future reference (as I have not finished reading
through the grex charter/bylaws/amendment history)...
Is physical presence a formal requirement of board membership? If not
a formal requirement, is it a practical necessity in order to contribute
meaningfully as a board member or have any board members ever served
from afar?
|