|
Grex > Music3 > #106: The Continuation of the Top Of the Park item |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 13 new of 77 responses total. |
oval
|
|
response 65 of 77:
| 
Jul 14 10:13 UTC 2002 |
'anywhere near as .....?)
okay this is the second post that seems to be cut off for me, and i'm
wondering if it's this damn stoned M$ pos i'm using.
|
carson
|
|
response 66 of 77:
|
Jul 14 16:54 UTC 2002 |
(I vote "yea." I suspect there's a terminal setting you could put
in a file somewhere to correct it, but heck if I know what either is.)
<blank space below for oval's benefit>
|
oval
|
|
response 67 of 77:
|
Jul 15 14:23 UTC 2002 |
lol thanks. i've retreated back to backtalk...
|
other
|
|
response 68 of 77:
|
Jul 16 16:30 UTC 2002 |
Well, hopefully, by the end of this week, TOP will be done for another
year. We're still wrangling with storage issues. Actually, though, I've
been asked to sit in on the periodic meetings of the Summer Festival
board's Operations Committee, since I seem to best equipped of all
available people to provide the board some measure of depth and meaning
to the numbers they shuffle around.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 69 of 77:
|
Jul 17 01:21 UTC 2002 |
resp:65 HyperTerminal probs?
|
dbratman
|
|
response 70 of 77:
|
Jul 31 00:49 UTC 2002 |
carson wrote: "if you look at a good majority of the shots, near the
top of the screen, boom mics are *clearly* visible."
If you see boom mikes in a theatrical film, chances are overwhelming
that the projector wasn't centered properly. The sloppiness isn't on
the part of the filmmaker, but on the part of the theatre. It's
regular practice to photograph films taller than they're intended to be
shown (and thus including the booms), and have the projector grate cut
off the part you're not supposed to see.
So sayeth Ebert.
|
carson
|
|
response 71 of 77:
|
Jul 31 01:09 UTC 2002 |
(hmm. does that explain the network television premiere of Rounders?
boom mics were clearly visible there, too.)
([fwiw, _Washington Post_ film critic Desson Howe agrees that if boom mics
are visible in a shot, it's the theatre's fault. I'm just not ready to
accept that as 100% true in all cases.])
|
brighn
|
|
response 72 of 77:
|
Jul 31 02:08 UTC 2002 |
The TV screen is at a different ratio. Obviously, if the boom mike is visible
there, it's because whoever transferred it into pan-and-scan messed up...
presumably somehow related to the film distribution company.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 73 of 77:
|
Jul 31 03:05 UTC 2002 |
I've heard that movies are now shot in an aspect suitable for television, with
excess background at the top and bottom to be cropped for wide-screen.
|
carson
|
|
response 74 of 77:
|
Jul 31 03:33 UTC 2002 |
(you know, you guys are REALLY screwing up my "`The Others' was sloppily
produced because it was executively produced by Tom Cruise, who wanted to
ruin his [at the time soon-to-be] ex-wife, Nicole Kidman's, movie career
as spectacularly as possible" conspiracy theory.)
|
brighn
|
|
response 75 of 77:
|
Jul 31 04:01 UTC 2002 |
You're just perpetuating the stereotype that gay men are vindictive and catty.
|
carson
|
|
response 76 of 77:
|
Jul 31 04:08 UTC 2002 |
(heh.)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 77 of 77:
|
Aug 3 01:57 UTC 2002 |
<falls down>
|