You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   39-63   64-88   89-113   114-138   139-163   164-188   189-213 
 214-238   239-263   264-288   289-313   314-338   339-363   364-388   389-413   414-438 
 439-463   464-488   489-513   514-526       
 
Author Message
25 new of 526 responses total.
tod
response 64 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 18:18 UTC 2006

re #62 slipped
nharmon
response 65 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 18:42 UTC 2006

Here is a pretty good article on the subject:
                       http://www.devbio.com/article.php?id=162

After reading this, I like both the embryological view and neurological
view on when life begins.

Embryological View:
"[T]he embryological view states that human life originates not at
fertilization but rather at gastrulation. Human embryos are capable of
splitting into identical twins as late as 12 days after fertilization
resulting in the development of separate individuals with unique
personalities[...] Therefore, properties governing individuality are not
set until after gastrulation."

Neurological View:
"Contemporary American (and Japanese) society defines death as the loss
of the pattern produced by a cerebral electroencephalogram (EEG). If
life and death are based upon the same standard of measurement, then the
beginning of human life should be recognized as the time when a fetus
acquires a recognizable EEG pattern. This acquisition occurs
approximately 24- 27 weeks after the conception of the fetus and is the
basis for the neurological view of the beginning of human life."
happyboy
response 66 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 18:46 UTC 2006

yawn.  how's your uterus these days, nate?
nharmon
response 67 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 19:00 UTC 2006

Slightly left, happyboy, get that sand out of your vagina yet?
albaugh
response 68 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 19:16 UTC 2006

"emergency contraception" - uh-huh
tod
response 69 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 19:34 UTC 2006

Human Life begins when you hear the baby cry and you cut the cord.
Everything prior to that is wishful thinking.
bru
response 70 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 19:37 UTC 2006

That is YOUR interpretation todd, and it is wrong.
nharmon
response 71 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 19:38 UTC 2006

"Wishful thinking" backed up by scientific evidence?
richard
response 72 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 21:10 UTC 2006

re #50 there are pills that make a miscarriage highly likely, but do not
"guarantee" it.  They did an ER episode a couple weeks ago where a catholic
doctor has a catholic patient who has been raped and is pregnant, and abortion
isnt acceptable.  He ends up prescribing the drug that temporarily widens the
vagins and makes a miscarriage more likely.
tod
response 73 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 21:34 UTC 2006

re #70
The only thing wrong is that men feel any entitlement to decisions about
another person's body: Namely women
edina
response 74 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:03 UTC 2006

Re 72  Oh for God's sake....you're quoting "ER"???  Way to make a plausible
argument.
bru
response 75 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:13 UTC 2006

no, if a child is viable at 6 months, it must be recognized as a life all its
own.
marcvh
response 76 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:14 UTC 2006

And on Boston Legal, there was a case where a rape victim was brought
into a Catholic hopsital, they refused emergency contraception, and so
they were sued for two point something million dollars.  Also William
Shatner tried to do magic tricks.
nharmon
response 77 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:17 UTC 2006

On The Shield there was this guy who last season moved to Farmington
from Texas, and Texas told the cops he was suspected in a lot of serial
killings, but nobody could tie him to anything. Apparently next week
they catch him for killing a lady that looks like one of the LAPD
detectives who badgered him about his missing sister this week.
edina
response 78 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:31 UTC 2006

Re 75  Viable by what standards?  Yours?  A doctor's?  With  or without
medical intervention?  Lots of kids out there being born that 30 years ago
wouldn't have stood a chance.  

My personal belief is that if a woman delivers a baby at 6 months, it's
viable.
richard
response 79 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:40 UTC 2006

it was a real drug they were using on E.R., I'll think of the name of it
edina
response 80 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:44 UTC 2006


happyboy
response 81 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:47 UTC 2006

my vagina is FINE nannystate-nate!
edina
response 82 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:48 UTC 2006

Or, as I was saying, COME ON!!  Quoting a TV show isn't the way to make a
plausible argument.

I mean, we have a differing approach on BCP, Richard.  I think they should
be prescribed - you don't.  I think they bear monitoring by a dr. or nurse
practitioner, as to the risks involved.  You feel that they are no more
harmful than aspirin.  Ok, fair enough.  I also like that you have to see a
dr., as they are generally prescribed at the conclusion of a gynecological
exam.  I think trackning a woman's gynecological health is a good thing. 
YMMV.

As for emergency contraception being available OTC - if you don't think it
will be abused, you are out of your mind.
tod
response 83 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:49 UTC 2006

re #75
Its recognized as alive when it comes out and breaths.  That's why you get
a birth certificate: To show you are alive
Like I said, wishful thinking anytime before actual breaths are taken.
edina
response 84 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 22:49 UTC 2006

My long-haired brethren from WA slipped...
happyboy
response 85 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 23:14 UTC 2006

/looks at bottom of shoe
tod
response 86 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 23:18 UTC 2006

I don't have time to explain right now.  -Jack Bauer
richard
response 87 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 00:42 UTC 2006

re #82 edina, if bcp's were over the counter, they wouldn't be NEARLY 
as abused as other drugs that ARE available over the counter-- such as 
alcohol for one.  edina you must favor prohibition since she doesn't 
think that any drug that would be widely abused should be available 
over the counter.
tod
response 88 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 00:57 UTC 2006

You think viagra should be over the counter, too?
 0-24   25-49   39-63   64-88   89-113   114-138   139-163   164-188   189-213 
 214-238   239-263   264-288   289-313   314-338   339-363   364-388   389-413   414-438 
 439-463   464-488   489-513   514-526       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss