You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   38-62   63-87   88-112   113-137   138-162   163-187   188-212 
 213-237   238-262   263-287   288-312   313-323      
 
Author Message
25 new of 323 responses total.
marcvh
response 63 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 23:20 UTC 2004

The Bush Administration, by contrast, is a paragon of transparency who
is always happy to share information.
tod
response 64 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 23:26 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 65 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 00:07 UTC 2004

What did the Clinton Administration hide (especially things more egregious
than like Cheney's energy advisory panel)? 
tod
response 66 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 00:09 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 67 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 00:19 UTC 2004

That would raise a stink.
jor
response 68 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 01:40 UTC 2004

        (rim shot for tod)
bru
response 69 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 08:04 UTC 2004

did I say the Bush administration was perfect?

where were the first ladies papers?  If they had been available the first week
it would have saved the government a load of money, but she lost them for over
2 years.

If you are being investigated, and you lose or hide needed documents, it is
going to caus ethe investigator to dig deeper.
rcurl
response 70 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 15:46 UTC 2004

You never lose/misplace anything? 
mcnally
response 71 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 16:09 UTC 2004

  re #70:  I lose things all the time, but when I do it's pretty clear I
  had no incentive to do so..  So far I've never "lost" documents that had
  been subpoenaed in an investigation.  Nor do I have a staff who can be
  tasked with finding stuff for me.
tod
response 72 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 16:12 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 73 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 17:44 UTC 2004

I hope everyone would agree that someone losing something for which they
might have an incentive to lose is not necessary guility of doing so
deliberately. 
tod
response 74 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 18:03 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

richard
response 75 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 09:05 UTC 2004

This is the MOVIES item guys.   Movies movies and more movies.  What movies
have you seen?  
klg
response 76 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 10:29 UTC 2004

"Not necessarily" but quite coincindentally.
gregb
response 77 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 17:35 UTC 2004

Thank you, Richard.

I saw Hellboy at the dollar theater.  I've never read the comics, but I
enjoyed it.  I didn't know Ron Pearlman was the star.  Seems like the
only time I see him is when he's covered in makeup.
jvmv
response 78 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 06:27 UTC 2004

     I have just watched again "Underneath", which dates
     from 1995. The direction is Okay but a little rough
     on the style. Trying to be clever Soderbergh didn't
     get great ideas to work out. "Underneath" is interesting
     to watch. As a movie itself, it's more than a experience.

mooncat
response 79 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 4 01:51 UTC 2004

I thought that Hellboy was entertaining. Okay, a bit predictable in 
spots, but the character of Hellboy was fun. The rest of the cast was 
all right, the fish-man (whose name is excaping me) was one of my 
favorites.

Saw Harry Potter: Prizoner of Azkhaban on IMAX a few weeks ago. I 
don't think that it was much better than non-IMAX, though maybe the 
IMAX experience would have been better if we (all 10 of us who went) 
were a few rows back and more to the center.

I do have to highly recommend the "Blue Collar Comedy Tour" with Jeff 
Foxworthy, Bill Engval, Larry the Cable guy and (my favorite) Ron 
White. Okay, so the humor is a bit low brow, but it never fails to 
make me laugh... a lot.
slynne
response 80 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 4 13:11 UTC 2004

I just wrote a very long email to a friend about The Station Agent. It 
occurred to me that I could post it here too as a review. The only 
thing is that this review has a minor spoiler in it so if you are one 
of those people who get really mad about those...you better skip this 
post. 







It was a very visually stunning movie. Every shot was
like a photograph. I have been working on developing
my eye for visual composition and I found this film to
be very enriching in that way. Naturally, I also was
very impressed with the characters which isnt a
surprise because character study as a genre has always
appealed to me. 

The scene near the end where Fin is stumbling drunk on
the tracks and then falls just before the train comes
by reminded me a lot of a short story called "A Train
is an Order of Occurance Designed to Lead to Some
Result" by Sherman Alexie. Have you read that? That
story has a lot of significance for me because I read
it the day before I found out a friend killed himself
by stumbling on the train tracks while high on a
suicidal dose of some pills. I dont know if he meant
to get run over by the train but he meant to off
himself so the end result was the same. Alexie's story
also is a reason why I have a personal rule not to
walk home from the bar on the tracks even though that
is the shortest route for me. 

mary
response 81 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 4 13:30 UTC 2004

I just have to start reading your blog, Lynne.  

I also really enjoyed Station Agent.  Fin was so unexpected and 
memorable.  And the movie wasn't sweet.  Big plus.

Last night I watched Aria.  It's a collection of shorts, by 
different directors, each done to an opera aria.  Three or four of 
the seven or eight I'm still thinking about, and that's good.  All 
are visually stunning and the music is incredible, as you'd expect.

I'd like to hear from someone who knows opera (Ken, Leslie?) as to 
whether the stories being told in the arias actually have much to do 
with the stories acted.  My ignorance of opera is vast.
fitz
response 82 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 4 14:07 UTC 2004

I rented Aria so long ago.  The Liebestod from  Tristan und Isolde I still
think about.  Yeah.  The two actors (one was Bridget Fonda) even look like
brother and sister.  The incestuous relationship explains a great deal.  Wow.

On the other hand, Vesti la giubba is played straight on and would be
recognizable to anyone--even if there were no music.  All you need know is
that Canio has been horridly cuckolded and belts out a classic lament of
having to make the audience laugh even though his life is a disaster.  That's
Caruso sing the track, by the way.  I've listen to it since I was ten and,
really, I have quite wearied of hearing any more of it.

The one with the bodybuilders:  I haven't a clue.
tod
response 83 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 4 17:04 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

twenex
response 84 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 4 17:07 UTC 2004

Eww.
jvmv
response 85 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 5 08:18 UTC 2004


     Watch "Girl with a Pearl Earring". It's fascinating.
     As someone who is a great fan of movies, I highly 
     recommend that film. 
     This is a beautiful film worthy of attention. Not the 
     best film of the year, but certainly one to look out 
     for. The direction was brilliant, the acting good.
     Directed by Peter Webber, made in Luxembourg, based on 
     a soap opera of Tracy Chevalier, "Girl with a Pearl 
     Earring" is definitely one of the best beautiful films. 

        
rcurl
response 86 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 5 18:17 UTC 2004

It's not just a "soap opera" - it is am invented story woven around the
painting of the same name and the artist Johannes Vermeer. It is worth
learning more about the painting, either before or after seeing the movie. 
See http://girl-with-a-pearl-earring.20m.com/. 


furs
response 87 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 6 20:32 UTC 2004

Saw Spiderman 2 yesterday.  I was suprised how prevalent the love story 
was, but I don't know that much about the spiderman comics or orignal 
series, so I'm not sure if it's dead on or not.  But I like it a lot.  
I thought the special effects where great and they even added a little 
humor.
 0-24   25-49   38-62   63-87   88-112   113-137   138-162   163-187   188-212 
 213-237   238-262   263-287   288-312   313-323      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss