You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   38-62   63-87   88-112   113-137   138-162   163-187   188-212 
 213-218          
 
Author Message
25 new of 218 responses total.
jep
response 63 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:28 UTC 2006

Highly enlightening, Todd, as usual.
tod
response 64 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:30 UTC 2006

I'll give you enlightening in the next few new items I post, professor.
richard
response 65 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:40 UTC 2006

it doesnt matter if they were wearing hunting jackets, cheney WAS NOT LICENSED
to hunt quail.  He had no legal right to hunt that particular animal.  He was
licensed to hunt deer.
tod
response 66 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:40 UTC 2006

One question raised by Whittington's condition is just how far from
Whittington was the vice president when he pulled the trigger on his 28-gauge
Perazzi Brescia Italian shotgun. The original report on the incident from the
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department says Cheney was 30 yards away from
Whittington. But the news that one shotgun pellet is now apparently lodged
in the muscle of Whittington's heart will likely lead to a reexamination of
the force with which Whittington was hit, and therefore, of the distance
between the two men when the shooting occurred.

*tipping my drink to drinky guy Cheney*
richard
response 67 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:48 UTC 2006

Whitting should sue Cheney and get some of his haliburton money
cyklone
response 68 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 19:01 UTC 2006

Jep, for what it's worth the drinking angle was not started on Grex. I've come
across it a couple of other times. Apparently, others are capable of deducing
the possibility from the facts known so far.
marcvh
response 69 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 19:38 UTC 2006

Supposedly MSNBC reported it earlier but then retracted the report.
It's entirely possible that it was simply a misquote or something.
But, since Cheney didn't allow law enforcement officers to talk to 
him until the following day, there's really no way anybody could
conclusively eliminate alcohol as a possible factor.  It's just another
facet of the fact that, even many Republicans agree, Cheney handled
this incident very stupidly.
johnnie
response 70 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 20:40 UTC 2006

Don't say "supposedly"--jep won't like that any better than
"apparently".  MSNBC did in fact post said report.  Here's the lowdown:  
http://blogs.philly.com/blinq/2006/02/was_there_beer_.html

Also, interestingly enough, despite their willingness to divulge many
details regarding the condition and treatment of Cheney's latest victim,
there are two things that the hospital officials have (repeatedly)
refused to comment on (note:  not, "we don't know", but rather "we can't
comment on that"):  the number and composition of the pellets in
Whittington's body, and whether or not he had alchohol in his system
when he was brought in.

And, jep, the shooting itself isn't necessarily a big deal (accidents
happen), but the VP's continuing efforts to withold information make it
look like there's more to the story, and that's making it all a bigger
story.  Further, in the absence of real information, rumor and innuendo
will fill the gap (PR101).  If Cheney had talked to the police
immediately, followed that up with a news release to the media, and
followed that with a short/informal press conference ("this is what
happened, it was a stupid accident, my apologies and prayers to my
friend", etc), this whole story would already be fading away.
richard
response 71 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 20:43 UTC 2006

they should have given Cheney a breathalyzer
jep
response 72 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 20:47 UTC 2006

According to the sheriff's report which I referred to in an article 
yesterday, police visited Cheney the evening of the incident.  But 
numerous reports *have* stated police didn't talk to Cheney until the 
next day, so at least that part of the story wasn't made up here.

re resp:68: I'm sticking with what I said.  Now you say you saw 
something about Cheney's drinking being somehow related, somewhere 
else.  Where?  Maybe someone on M-Net?  (After they saw it here, 
perhaps?)

There seems to be no evaluation of the facts going on at all here.  
People here hate the Administration and/or Republicans in general, the 
vice president shot someone in a hunting accident, there's very free 
mixing in of "wouldn't it be cool if *THIS* had happened too?" and the 
story grows and grows, feeding on itself and wishes that it was bigger.

re resp:70: An absence of information is no excuse for making up rumors.
tod
response 73 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 20:48 UTC 2006

re #70
They don't have to comment on the number of pellets or size.  We know its in
the range of 200 and it was 28 gauge birdshot.

 "Whittington, a Republican stalwart and lawyer in Texas, was struck by up to
 200 pellets when Cheney, hunting on a south Texas ranch, reportedly whirled
 around to fire at a covey of quail and hit Whittington instead."
 http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/15/cheney.reut

What's this say to me?
Well, it tells me that somebody is lying when they write in the report
that Cheney was 30 yards away from Whittington.
tod
response 74 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 20:54 UTC 2006

re #72
"wouldn't it be cool if *THIS* had happened too?"
Where there's a vacuum: It will be filled

Cheney hasn't had a press conference in 3 1/2 years.  You expect people to
just ignore that he's VP or to not make speculations when he isn't forthcoming
about his dealings both professional and personal?  The guy was hunting
without a license and shot somebody.  You think people should just mind their
own business and forget that he shot somebody?  Are you serious?
jep
response 75 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 21:53 UTC 2006

I don't expect people to make up stuff and then treat it like it's 
facts.  Is that how you usually deal with a lack of information?  It 
isn't what I do.
tod
response 76 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 22:30 UTC 2006

People gossip and speculate when there are gaps in stories.  Me? Yea, I tend
to think the old geezer was boozing it up when he went hunting cuz that's what
people in Texas do for recreation: Drink and kill
gull
response 77 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 00:30 UTC 2006

Re resp:52: I predict that whether the guy lives or dies, Cheney will 
not see any consequences. 
keesan
response 78 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 00:33 UTC 2006

Has anyone calculated how close someone would need to be to receive 200
pellets from the gun?   Can you shoot 200 of them 30 yards in a straight line?
marcvh
response 79 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 00:41 UTC 2006

In case anybody hasn't been watching Faux News, Cheney has admitted to
drinking "a beer" at lunch.  It's plausible that it wasn't a factor in
the shooting (but it's certainly not a given.)
richard
response 80 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 00:42 UTC 2006

re #79 oh sure, Cheney only had ONE beer.  Anyone really believe that?
johnnie
response 81 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 00:48 UTC 2006

"A beer at lunch" is the standard reply when a policeman asks a drunk,
"Have you had anything to drink this evening, sir?"

Also, MSNBC has un-removed the beer reference in their article, without
so far saying why it was removed in the first place.

This, too:  The woman put forth as a witness to the shooting, Katharine
Armstrong, seems not to have actually seen much of anything.  In an
interview with the AP, she says she first knew something had happened
when she saw medical personnel rushing to the scene (she figured Cheney
had suffered a heart attack).  
 
And this tidbit (from the Fox interview):  After nearly killing his
friend, Cheney decided not to bother going to the hospital, since there
"wasn't room in the ambulance" (like there were no other cars around?).  
richard
response 82 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 01:10 UTC 2006

re #81 according to news reports, instead of going to the hospital, 
Cheney went home and poured himself a good stiff cocktail.
marcvh
response 83 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 01:15 UTC 2006

Maybe his Secret Service agents saw something.  We should depose them.
charcat
response 84 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 01:43 UTC 2006

my memories from my hunting days are that birdshot is usually #6 shot, a
little smaller than a standard bb and at 30 yards it is close to being
spent, might go a little damage possibly penetrate under the skin but
into the chest, through shirts and orange hunting jacket? I don't think
so. 50 yards would be just like a sprinkle of small hail stones. The
pattern would depend on the choke on the gun.
nharmon
response 85 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 03:25 UTC 2006

The ballastics of a shotgun blast depend on a lot of factors. Off the
top of my head, I can think of barrel length, muzzle choke, guage, shell
length, shell manufacturer, firearm manufacturer, whether the firearm is
pump-action; semi-automatic; or break-away are all factors that would
affect this. 
bru
response 86 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 06:19 UTC 2006

there are 225 pellets in an oz. of #6 shot in a standard 1 oz load for small
game birds.  The pellets are much smaller than a BB, almost half the size.

pattern sepends a lot on barrel length, choke, and the type of shotgun shell
used.

The point is, Cheney was involved in a hunting accident.  He fired his shotgun
adn injured his friend.

Had he been drinking?  I don't know and even if he had not been, came out and
said he had not been, there would still be people saying he must have been.

Going to the hospital would NOT have been an option in the eyes of the secret
service.  Not in the ambulance, not in his own car.  to have done so would
have endangered the life of his friend because 500 reporteres woul ahve shown
up and tried to find out what had happened, distracting the doctors and
hospital operations.
jep
response 87 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 13:24 UTC 2006

I would very likely have gone to a nearby house and had a drink, 
myself, if I'd just shot someone accidentally.

Yes, I find it credible that the vice president had a beer at lunch and 
then went hunting several hours later.  Why wouldn't I?  Other than for 
the purpose of trying to invent a better story, I see no reason for 
anyone not to believe that.

But then, I have no interest in the story beyond the uninteresting 
occurrance of a shooting accident.  It doesn't feel like a lost 
opportunity to me, if nothing else happened.  Others who have more of a 
stake in the event want more of a story.  And are willing to go to 
great lengths to get one; lengths to which, I prefer to believe, I 
would not go even if I was trying to make a political point as they 
are.  I want to hang on to my self-respect and credibility, which are 
more valuable to me than the warmth I would get from making up a story 
and pretending it is true.  Different people have different values, as 
we can see in this item.
 0-24   25-49   38-62   63-87   88-112   113-137   138-162   163-187   188-212 
 213-218          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss