You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   38-62   63-87   88-99      
 
Author Message
25 new of 99 responses total.
dcat
response 63 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 25 23:36 UTC 2003

Monday's (http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20030825) is also good.
But then, I gather they pretty nearly always are.
gelinas
response 64 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 00:50 UTC 2003

True, but yesterday's was about the blackout.
russ
response 65 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 03:05 UTC 2003

Speaking of the blackout, I finally got a chance to read Saturday's
NYT article about it.  The details of the timeline are awe-inspiring
in the way massive forces marshalled themselves with such speed, but I
digress....

As it happens the problems began with First Energy in Ohio, but the
vulnerabilities are probably built into the system.  We depend too much
on long-distance transmission of power (which is not terribly efficient
in any case, and should be discouraged by policy) and the communications
system for handling imbalances is people yakking over telephones.  This
is good for problems coming up over the next hour, but totally inadequate
to handle lightning-fast changes over the next ten seconds.  If we are
going to continue as we are, we need to find ways to manage power much
better.  For instance, if First Energy had been able to cut every
air conditioner in Cleveland back to half power in response to the
power lines failing, the problem might never have happened.  If Michigan
had 2 GW of surge power on tap, the local grid would have stayed up
long enough to cut Ohio loose.  Etc, etc.  There are a lot of things
we need to address.
rcurl
response 66 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 03:32 UTC 2003

I found that the articles in the newspapers I read quote officials giving
oversimplified analyses of what they think happened, talking as though
electricity was like water being pumped around the system. One event that
was describe was an "unexplained" surge of 4000 megawatts into the
Michigan network. Well, electricity isn't stored in the network, so a
"surge" of power into the network would require that it be consumed
somewhere, but unless it melted a lot of copper, where would it go? Of
course, trey didn't say how long that "surge" lasted, and there could be
such a pulse into reactance in the system if the source phase slipped from
the load phase. That's the kind of detail I would like to read about.  I
suppose it will be available eventually. 

One commentator on NPR tried to explain how fast problems can move in the
system by saying that the "electrons move at the speed of light".
Well..not quite. Direct current electrons move at most at only centimeters
per hour, depending on the current and the wire cross section (there is a
calculator for this at
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/miccur.html#c3). 
Disturbance, of course, move much faster as waves through the population
of electrons. If he had said, "disturbances move at the speed of light (in
the conductor)" he would have been OK. 

pvn
response 67 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 04:50 UTC 2003

Alright, so what moves and what direction does it move?  (Lightning
actually moves from the ground up to the sky, not the opposite which is
what we perceive as we are used to gravity - ie things don't fall into
the sky.)  

Muna is actually what was flowing, electrons are merely like ball
bearings that ease the way and some substances have more electrons
that are greased to ease the passage of muna.  It is entirely possible
that something in Ohio caused muna to rapidly leak out over the ground
and thus the direction of muna flow reversed course.  It is also
possible that somethings in Canada suddenly stopped wanting muna, and
since muna likes to keep moving once it is finally convinced to do so it
headed back home where it came from so the buckeyes may have been the
victims not the cause.  The other problem with muna is that it is hard
to coordinate things.  Some early practioners in the art of muna
movement decided to wiggle the muna to try to coordinate events and that
has worked pretty well so far but the modern problem is that folks are
trying to move muna really long distances and so its sometimes hard to
figure out what has happened after an event as folk don't always know
what time it is as wiggling muna confuses things.
rcurl
response 68 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 06:23 UTC 2003

Is muna a form of phlogiston? 
gull
response 69 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 12:59 UTC 2003

Re #66: Then you would have quibbled by saying "it's actually more like
70% the speed of light." ;>
rcurl
response 70 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 17:13 UTC 2003

I said "at the speed of light (in the conductor)" to include the reduced
speed of the disturbance in a conductor compared to that in free space.
Therefore I had already quibbled......
i
response 71 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 02:47 UTC 2003

What's to stop any given utility from rigging a computerized "fire
curtain" into their central control system, so that (when the larger
grid's getting out of control) they can both cut themselves off from
the larger grid and cut enough of their own load (via blackouts) to
achieve independent, local stability?
russ
response 72 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 03:16 UTC 2003

Re #66:  I expect that the (scientifically illiterate, if at all
typical) reporter was trying to get his mind around something
like the surge of power from Ontario and Indiana through the
Detroit area toward Cleveland, where powerplants were tripping
off-line as the failed powerlines overloaded them.

I expect that the solution is going to have to be systems which
automatically shed load (create local blackouts) if major power
sources are lost for any reason.  This is anathema to system
managers, but if there is no effort to reconcile demand with
supply the alternative is the risk of more huge blackouts.
rcurl
response 73 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 06:09 UTC 2003

Do you know why load shedding is disliked (if not anathema)? Load shedding
should go along almost automatically with generation dropouts. 

There is an ultimate technical problem with even using AC, which is phase
matching, which makes grid regulation tricky. Think of having two home AC
generators and trying to put them in parallel (it is even a problem for
load leveling, but phase matching makes it much harder). It would be
easier with DC (also with fewer losses), with the use of modern converters
for voltage shifting.

scott
response 74 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 10:30 UTC 2003

It is a bit amusing to think about technically-deficient explanations, though.

"My God, that power surge must still be trapped on the transmission lines!"
"Get me Jed Collick!!!"
gull
response 75 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 13:28 UTC 2003

Re #71: That's sometimes done; it's called "islanding".  There are two
problems, though, as I understand it.  One is that the local utility may
simply not have the generating capacity to carry the load once they're
isolated from the grid.  Another is that it becomes difficult to get the
islands back in phase to reconnect them later, without shutting
everything down.

Re #72: Automatic under-frequency load shedding was supposed to have
been implemented after the major blackout in the 70's, but obviously the
systems aren't as effective as people had hoped.  The major blackouts on
the west coast in the 90s (some of which actually did end with the west
coast seperating into three "islands") showed that sequencing automatic
controls so that they trip in a way that limits damage, instead of
causing it to cascade through the system, is difficult.  We don't seem
to be able to model the behavior of these complicated power grid systems
very well.
rcurl
response 76 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 16:28 UTC 2003

I just looked at the undergraduate curriculum in electrical engineering at
the UM, and there are no courses in power generation and transmission.
This type of neglect in universities for "established technologies" is
pretty common. The real knowledge and expertise moves into the industry
itself and students can only become expert in the technology by
apprenticing themselves.  This isn't unexpected as industry develops
systems and processes that they want to keep proprietary, so universities
can't even learn about them. On the other hand, it creates some barriers
between really advanced theoretical developments in universities and
applications in industry.

I saw this happen in chemical engineering at UM when a large chemical
company sought to learn about the expertise available in the chemical
engineering department. Their staff met with faculty members and discussed
what the faculty were doing in research and teaching. However we could
learn nothing about what the company was doing, even to obtain ideas for
more modern and realistic problems to use in some courses. Some individual
liaisons were created but so much was proprietary that it didn't really
help the overall educational mission of the department. 

So maybe our inability to model these power generation and distribution
systems is limited in part by this university-industrial gap in two-way
information sharing. 
tod
response 77 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 16:50 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 78 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 17:19 UTC 2003

Doesn't sound like they'd let you try to balance loads and phase in a grid
after that course.... Did the Purdue or USMC courses teach that? This is
really pretty complicated stuff as transmission lines really are 
Transmission Lines, with their characteristic impedance, requiring matched
terminations, etc. Then, how do you get all the generators humming the same
note...without destructive beats? 

I have no idea how developed the science of this is, but I would think
that industry would not have many scientists that devote their time to
thinking this through. The industry probably does underwrite a research
consortium that doles out grants to universities for some related work.
albaugh
response 79 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 19:12 UTC 2003

From: <BreakingNews@MAIL.CNN.COM>
Subject:      CNN Breaking News

Major power outage hits south London, cutting subway service 
during evening rush hour.
klg
response 80 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 19:34 UTC 2003

A tree fell in Cleveland again?
tod
response 81 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 19:49 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 82 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 23:11 UTC 2003

My point was that UM doesn't offer anything concerning power grid operation.

The USMC would do that, for their purposes. That was also my point - the
training in power technology has moved to industry (and of course, the
military - those that *use* the technology).

Did your training include synchronizing two generators feeding the
power system simultaneously?
tod
response 83 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 23:29 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 84 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 29 00:00 UTC 2003

Re #76: I had "power systems" courses that covered generation and
transmission, as well as stuff like AC motors and industrial controls,
as an undergrad at Michigan Tech.  I was in the School of Technology,
but I assume the School of Engineering has similar but more in-depth
(and probably less hands-on) courses.  Generally at MTU the School of
Technology's courses involve a lot of lab work, and the School of
Engineering's courses involve a lot more theory and computer simulation.
i
response 85 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 29 01:54 UTC 2003

Re: #75
The local utility doesn't need to have enough generating capacity active
"on the island" when they cut it loose from the grid...IF they have the
ability to both measure usage in and blackout a fair number of smaller 
parts of the island.  X times per second, a computer in their central 
switching HQ solves the problem "if we cut to being an island right now,
which pieces of load and/or supply would have to immediately cut to have
our island's grid viably balanced?".  If the larger grid gets too bad to
hand onto, then the computers simultaneously cut off from it and off from
the load and/or supply that the island can't keep up right now. 

Where do the power plants get their 60Hz reference from now?  Or is it
just a brute-force "democratic vote" of the local references on a variety
of pieces of equipment?  Sounds like syncing islands to rejoin is a "we
never bothered to make control systems for that" problem.  
polytarp
response 86 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 29 02:00 UTC 2003

Sounds like it.
rcurl
response 87 of 99: Mark Unseen   Aug 29 05:32 UTC 2003

I don't know where they get their reference, but I do know that the
frequency wanders during the day, such that clocks that use synchronouos
motors vary daily by several minutes (mostly partly corrected overnight -
see http://web.ukonline.co.uk/freshwater/clocks/synch.htm).

 0-24   25-49   38-62   63-87   88-99      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss