|
Grex > Iq > #136: Questions, anyone? | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 680 responses total. |
jakrabit
|
|
response 628 of 680:
| 
Aug 29 16:07 UTC 2000 |
do you think maybe they had all the answers for the time being, and did need
to ask any questions?
|
rcurl
|
|
response 629 of 680:
|
Aug 29 17:36 UTC 2000 |
Did you mean to write "...and didn't need..."?
|
jakrabit
|
|
response 630 of 680:
|
Aug 29 20:21 UTC 2000 |
you would think i would know how to proof my own work, wouldn't you?
|
dcat
|
|
response 631 of 680:
|
Jun 19 00:38 UTC 2003 |
*I* would think so, but do you? And do I really want to resurrect this
apparently-dead item?
|
kip
|
|
response 632 of 680:
|
Jun 19 03:02 UTC 2003 |
And will the rest of Grex come back here to continue the play?
|
dcat
|
|
response 633 of 680:
|
Jun 19 14:12 UTC 2003 |
Or does anyone really care anymore? (Or has this already been asked?)
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 634 of 680:
|
Jun 19 16:35 UTC 2003 |
Why do you care if anyone really cares?
|
dcat
|
|
response 635 of 680:
|
Jun 19 17:20 UTC 2003 |
Well, isn't it kinda pointless to keep this going if nobody cares anymore?
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 636 of 680:
|
Jun 19 20:19 UTC 2003 |
Isn't that the point?
|
dcat
|
|
response 637 of 680:
|
Jun 19 23:20 UTC 2003 |
Is there a point?
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 638 of 680:
|
Jun 20 15:48 UTC 2003 |
Wht worry about it?
|
dcat
|
|
response 639 of 680:
|
Jun 20 16:08 UTC 2003 |
Who says I was worried? Can't I just idly ask a question?
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 640 of 680:
|
Jun 20 18:24 UTC 2003 |
Don't all the idle questions just lie around until someone sweeps them
up?
|
carson
|
|
response 641 of 680:
|
Jun 20 20:32 UTC 2003 |
(who's going to sweep them up?)
|
kip
|
|
response 642 of 680:
|
Jun 20 20:43 UTC 2003 |
Would it be alright if I swept them up?
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 643 of 680:
|
Jun 20 22:18 UTC 2003 |
Why do you want to sweep them up?
|
dcat
|
|
response 644 of 680:
|
Jun 21 19:08 UTC 2003 |
What's wrong with a bunch of idle questions lying round? Why do they need
to be swept up?
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 645 of 680:
|
Jun 21 21:31 UTC 2003 |
Won't people trip over them?
|
dcat
|
|
response 646 of 680:
|
Jun 22 03:32 UTC 2003 |
How is it my problem (or anyone else's) if they can't watch where they're
going?
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 647 of 680:
|
Jun 23 15:49 UTC 2003 |
Shouldn't they expect a reasonably clear path to walk on?
|
dcat
|
|
response 648 of 680:
|
Jun 23 22:30 UTC 2003 |
Can't they clear their own damn path?
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 649 of 680:
|
Jun 24 18:59 UTC 2003 |
Why should they??
|
dcat
|
|
response 650 of 680:
|
Jun 24 20:05 UTC 2003 |
Why should I? Why can't they just pay more attention?
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 651 of 680:
|
Jun 24 22:11 UTC 2003 |
Why do they have to??
|
kip
|
|
response 652 of 680:
|
Jun 24 22:21 UTC 2003 |
Weren't we told that this game would require careful attention to detail?
|