You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   36-60   61-85   86-96      
 
Author Message
25 new of 96 responses total.
ric
response 61 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 14:05 UTC 2006

I celebrated by attending a Carolina Hurricanes hockey game, in which the
first place Canes beat down the montreal canadiens.

Then I took my niece home, got back to my house around 11:55, turned on the
TV, watched the ball drop, kissed my wife and went to sleep
bhoward
response 62 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 15:23 UTC 2006

Four days on and we are finished, or rather, I nearly was.
naftee
response 63 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 20:51 UTC 2006

re 60 
You're a guy ?!
dude.
uh !
that's creepy ?!
slynne
response 64 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 00:05 UTC 2006

...or something
bhelliom
response 65 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 05:30 UTC 2006

resp:54 George is no one's pal.
mcnally
response 66 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 23:58 UTC 2006

 That's probably a bit harsh.  I'll bet there are many who have been
 happy to see George again after an unexpected absence.
gull
response 67 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 02:39 UTC 2006

Re resp:56: "Time balls" were once commonly used as devices for
signalling standard time, mostly so ships at dock could reset their
chronometers:

http://www.tumblong.uts.edu.au/artefacts/greenwich/more.cfm
rcurl
response 68 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 06:55 UTC 2006

You're right! And, I knew that...but had gone blank in connecting the
*slow lowering* of the Times Square  ball, and the *dropping* of the
time balls used for chronometer synchronization. My search of the web,
however, did not find how fast they were "dropped:. They say they were
dropped, but since they were big (a yard of more in diameter, 50 lbs or so
in weight), I find it hard to imagine that they were simply dropped. More
likely, they were lowered, but rapidly. After all, a "minute is a mile
the world around" (that's *nautical* mile), so every second is ca. 31 meters,
so the ball would have to drop in much less than a minute to have a longitude
precision (at the equator) of one nautical mile. 
gull
response 69 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 23:09 UTC 2006

The nautical mile makes some kind of sense to me, but I've always
wondered where the statute mile comes from.
marcvh
response 70 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 00:04 UTC 2006

Well, it's 8 furlongs, obviously, and a furlong is 40 rods.  What could be
simpler?

What I find more mysterious is where "acre" came from, though I guess
it's 10 square chains, and a chain is 4 rods, so that makes sense enough.
aruba
response 71 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 04:21 UTC 2006

Which is why the chain was the unit of choice in a lot of old surveying, and
still appears on a lot of deeds.  (A chain is 66 feet.)
rcurl
response 72 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 06:31 UTC 2006

Then there is the *rood*, 0.25 acre or 40 square rods....

It gets more complicated (or more interesting?).

"The U.S. survey mile is equal to 5,280 U.S. survey feet, 6,336/3,937 km 
or approximately 1,609.347 m. One international mile is equal to 0.999 998 
survey miles. The survey mile is used by the United States Public Land 
Survey System."

"The international mile is the distance typically meant when the word mile 
is used without qualification. It is defined to be precisely 1,760 
international yards (by definition, 0.9144 m each) and is therefore 
exactly 1,609.344 m (1.609344 km). It is used in the United States and the 
United Kingdom as part of the Imperial system of units. The international 
mile is equivalent to 8 furlongs, 80 chains or 5,280 international feet."

"The statute mile is a mile of 5,280 feet, without specifying which foot 
is used. The term is therefore ambiguous."

(That's what http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mile says, but it still leaves a 
question as to which mile your odometer measures, and which is used for 
rods and chains.)

At least

"The international nautical mile is defined to be 1,852 m. It is used 
universally for aviation, naval and maritime purposes and originated from 
the geographical mile."

while

"The geographical mile is a unit of length determined by 1 minute of arc 
along the Earth's equator, approximately equal to 1855 metres (6087.15 
international feet)."

Which all makes it even more amazing that we landed the Rovers on Mars.
aruba
response 73 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 07:01 UTC 2006

Heh.  Well, the difference between an international mile and a survey mile
is less than 3.2mm, so not that big a deal.  My understading is that they
redefined the inch to be exactly 2.54cm at some point, and the rest of those
international definitions follow from that.
keesan
response 74 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 18:12 UTC 2006

South Ireland uses Euro's - are they also metric?
rcurl
response 75 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 19:56 UTC 2006

If you drive 100,000 miles, the different between the international and survey
distance is 320 meters! You'd notice that hike.
aruba
response 76 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 22:17 UTC 2006

Well, only because your legs would be cramped from being in the car for two
months solid. :)
gull
response 77 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 23:00 UTC 2006

Considering odometers are allowed to have something like 5% error when
new, and it's often higher on cars that have had their tires replaced,
the 0.0002% difference between a survey mile and an international mile
is lost in the noise.
jep
response 78 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 01:40 UTC 2006

I thought a "mile" was the distance a Roman legion could march in an
hour.  I thought the kilometer was defined in some function of the
diameter of the Earth, but I didn't know the mile was defined that way. 
klg
response 79 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 03:39 UTC 2006

In France the metric system officially started in June 1799 with the
declared intent of being 'For all people, for all time'.  The unit of
length was the metre which was defined as being one ten-millionth part
of a quarter of the earth's circumference.  The metre is now defined as
the distance traveled by light in a vacuum in 1/299,792,458 second.
naftee
response 80 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 04:47 UTC 2006

j'men fous des tabarnak de francais, hostie.  sont juste la pour crisser la
marde sur les quebecois.
rcurl
response 81 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 06:10 UTC 2006

Re #77: yes, but *what value for the mile did they choose* when designing
the odometer? 
edina
response 82 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 15:53 UTC 2006

Re 74 - What is "South" Ireland?  You mean like Cork?
jadecat
response 83 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 17:32 UTC 2006

I think she means the Republic of Ireland...
jadecat
response 84 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 17:32 UTC 2006

Though Cork is rather nice.
edina
response 85 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 18:08 UTC 2006

I agree.  That's just funny "South Ireland".  Like there is a confederacy.
 0-24   25-49   36-60   61-85   86-96      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss