|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 14 new of 73 responses total. |
jaklumen
|
|
response 60 of 73:
| 
Jan 10 12:22 UTC 2004 |
ya know ya make me hot when ya talk dirty like that.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 61 of 73:
|
Jan 10 14:09 UTC 2004 |
I don't want to make you hot. I've seen what you post about in the sex.cf.
|
naftee
|
|
response 62 of 73:
|
Jan 10 17:06 UTC 2004 |
YEA, he'll come to m-net, where it's HOT and FAST. BOO YEA
|
janc
|
|
response 63 of 73:
|
Jan 10 19:55 UTC 2004 |
A linked item is a hard link, but the item directories are owned by
"cfadm". No fairwitness could link an item by executing "ln" themselves.
If backtalk and picospan were modified not to prevent fw's in those
conferences from executing the "link" command, it would prevent linked
items.
|
jep
|
|
response 64 of 73:
|
Jan 11 03:55 UTC 2004 |
It would take a modification to picospan and backtalk? Somehow I
don't see those two changes as being very likely.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 65 of 73:
|
Jan 11 10:12 UTC 2004 |
resp:61 pretty much in context with the rest of the horrors there ;)
don't read it if you can't handle it
|
cyklone
|
|
response 66 of 73:
|
Jan 11 14:45 UTC 2004 |
Very good! Glad to see you get it.
|
janc
|
|
response 67 of 73:
|
Jan 11 17:45 UTC 2004 |
I'd be perfectly willing to make such a change to Backtalk. Having more
per-conference configurability of user and fw powers is something I want
to do anyway. I even have some notes on how to do this.
I suspect the chances of changes to Picospan are slimmer.
|
jep
|
|
response 68 of 73:
|
Jan 12 00:42 UTC 2004 |
I was envisioning a way to remove the Unix link command itself. But
then, I was envisioning a way to use a separate Unix loginid to own
the blog files. I guess that part would be difficult if we didn't
also use a separate set of Picospan and Backtalk binaries, huh?
Oh, well. My idea is more involved than I had expected. It is hereby
junked at this time, but if the capabilities come together at some
point in the future, I think it could be worth revisiting.
In general, I support the blog conference. I think it will be a very
resource-intensive fw position for someone if it becomes popular, but
it's worth a try.
Grex has tried very few new ideas in the past, and could benefit from
some innovation. I don't think we should be quick to shoot down
something new. This blog conference proposal is new, different, and
outside the normal historical scope of Grex's functions. Those are
positives.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 69 of 73:
|
Jan 12 01:46 UTC 2004 |
resp:66 why thankee.
|
naftee
|
|
response 70 of 73:
|
Jan 12 05:52 UTC 2004 |
Yer welcome!@
|
willcome
|
|
response 71 of 73:
|
Jan 12 10:02 UTC 2004 |
You're welcome!
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 72 of 73:
|
Jan 12 12:39 UTC 2004 |
yeah, yeah, break out the Moosehead beer already. You two are overdue
for that six-pack roulette match, eh? ;)
|
jesuit
|
|
response 73 of 73:
|
May 17 02:14 UTC 2006 |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
|