| You are not logged in. Login Now | register | search | |||||||||
|
| |||
| Author | Message | ||
| 3 new of 61 responses total. | |||
|
nharmon |
I would think so. This would be a case where our warped idea of "intellectual property" has twisted what copyright is. Everything is in the public domain, only the government grants exclusive rights to the inventor for a limited period of time. It isn't the inventor that OWNs the intellectual property, but rather the inventor has a license from the government saying he/she has exclusive rights to use it. | ||
|
cyklone |
While I agree that's a reasonable interpretation of the Constitution, as a practical matter, it means little when Disney lobbies for an extension every time Mickey's about to fall into the public domain. | ||
|
tod |
re #58 If people use the licensed item without dispute for a long enough period then yes it goes into PD. re #60 There is a fine distinction with Mickey because he was animated "with sound". There were mice before him like "Miky Mouse" (which Walt stole outright from a Jewish toy maker in Ohio) prior to 1923..those would be public domain and ripe for "any kind of usage". >:) | ||
|
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In |
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss