You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   34-58   59-61       
 
Author Message
3 new of 61 responses total.
nharmon
response 59 of 61: Mark Unseen   Oct 30 13:46 UTC 2006

I would think so. This would be a case where our warped idea of
"intellectual property" has twisted what copyright is. Everything is in
the public domain, only the government grants exclusive rights to the
inventor for a limited period of time. It isn't the inventor that OWNs
the intellectual property, but rather the inventor has a license from
the government saying he/she has exclusive rights to use it.
cyklone
response 60 of 61: Mark Unseen   Oct 30 21:22 UTC 2006

While I agree that's a reasonable interpretation of the Constitution, as a
practical matter, it means little when Disney lobbies for an extension every
time Mickey's about to fall into the public domain. 
tod
response 61 of 61: Mark Unseen   Oct 30 21:31 UTC 2006

re #58
If people use the licensed item without dispute for a long enough period then
yes it goes into PD.

re #60
There is a fine distinction with Mickey because he was animated "with sound".
There were mice before him like "Miky Mouse" (which Walt stole outright from
a Jewish toy maker in Ohio) prior to 1923..those would be public domain and
ripe for "any kind of usage".  >:)

 0-24   25-49   34-58   59-61       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss