|
Grex > Agora56 > #31: It is time to get the hell OUT of Iraq! | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 133 responses total. |
naftee
|
|
response 58 of 133:
| 
Jan 8 04:35 UTC 2006 |
pickles clean your teeth. somewhat.
|
scholar
|
|
response 59 of 133:
|
Jan 8 10:12 UTC 2006 |
by the way: i ordered a SUPER TIGHT CLEAR *VAG* fleshlight.
I WANT TO WATCH MYSELF AS I MASTURBATE.
|
scholar
|
|
response 60 of 133:
|
Jan 8 11:13 UTC 2006 |
OH< ALSO< UH>
APPARENTLY< I BOUGHT ABOUT 0.8 LITRES OF LUBE>
THAT"S A BIT MORE THAN A STANDARD BOTTLE OF WINE OR LIQUOR
|
scholar
|
|
response 61 of 133:
|
Jan 8 19:12 UTC 2006 |
what!
why is it taking so long to clear customs?!
did any of YOU call and claim there was obscene material in it or something?!
|
rcurl
|
|
response 62 of 133:
|
Jan 8 19:57 UTC 2006 |
The customs agents are trying it out...
|
scholar
|
|
response 63 of 133:
|
Jan 8 20:16 UTC 2006 |
:(
i hope they wash it awfully varefully. :(
or i'll have to buy a bunch of rubbers. :(
,.
|
naftee
|
|
response 64 of 133:
|
Jan 8 22:04 UTC 2006 |
what !
what if the supre-tight model is uh,, TOO TIGHT >!
|
scholar
|
|
response 65 of 133:
|
Jan 8 22:05 UTC 2006 |
i haven't heard any complaints of that one b eing too tight.
i've heard complaints about it being too loose ; a guy i know on irc
apparently uses rubber bands to make his tighter.
also,
i've heard complaints about the ultratight one being too tight.
|
naftee
|
|
response 66 of 133:
|
Jan 8 22:11 UTC 2006 |
i'm thinking it'll loosen the more you use it, and so it's good to buy
something that's SLIGHTLY TOO TIGHT than one that's too loose.
also ; is there an irc channel for general fleshlight discussion ?
|
scholar
|
|
response 67 of 133:
|
Jan 8 22:23 UTC 2006 |
i don't know.
there's a message board.
|
naftee
|
|
response 68 of 133:
|
Jan 8 22:28 UTC 2006 |
nobody in #fleshlight on undernet :(
|
jep
|
|
response 69 of 133:
|
Jan 9 01:43 UTC 2006 |
re resp:57: I imagine the expense is substantial.
I wonder if there isn't some resistance to the idea from the troops? In
my experience, soldiers in training avoid carrying any kind of equipment
they don't have to -- including steel (now kevlar) pots and chemical
protection (MOPP) gear. Maybe body armor is cumbersome enough that the
troops would rather not have it.
|
tod
|
|
response 70 of 133:
|
Jan 9 02:36 UTC 2006 |
What kind of knucklehead would forego their flack jacket and helmet let alone
body armor if available?
|
johnnie
|
|
response 71 of 133:
|
Jan 9 03:22 UTC 2006 |
I did see an article that claimed some soldiers preferred mobility and
speed over the protection of (heavy) body armor.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 72 of 133:
|
Jan 9 03:43 UTC 2006 |
re #69: Many families have buying body armor for servicemembers who are
deployed overseas. I don't doubt that there are soldiers in Iraq who would
choose not to have body armor but my guess is that there are a lot more of
them who wish they had the option.
|
klg
|
|
response 73 of 133:
|
Jan 9 11:48 UTC 2006 |
What portion of the servicemembers deployed overseas are (a) in
battlezones and (b) what percent are in combat?
|
tod
|
|
response 74 of 133:
|
Jan 9 17:00 UTC 2006 |
re #73
Your question should be "What percentage receiving dangerzone pay have not
been issued body armor?"
|
i
|
|
response 75 of 133:
|
Jan 10 00:48 UTC 2006 |
Hasn't there been a years-long scandal over the lack of decent body armor
for many of our troops in Iraq, complete with a no-bid contract going to
a very-well-connected businessman...who had never actually done anything
resembling large-scale manufacturing, and never managed to ship anything,
but plenty of our boys died for lack of any protection while Mr. Connected
was wasting time, foot-dragging by highly-placed chickenhawks who seemed
worried that rushing in armor to reduce the the number of mere US soldiers
maimed & killed might reflect badly on their august selves, etc.?
|
scholar
|
|
response 76 of 133:
|
Jan 10 03:14 UTC 2006 |
WHOA< CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN WHY MY PACKAGE IS OUT OF CUSTOMS AND>>> BACK IN
NEVADA?!
WHAT THE FUCK>
I"M CONFUSED > :(
|
naftee
|
|
response 77 of 133:
|
Jan 10 05:00 UTC 2006 |
what !
oh no :(
A BOOMERANG PACKAGE
|
scholar
|
|
response 78 of 133:
|
Jan 10 07:50 UTC 2006 |
WHOA!
NOW IT"S IN MEMPHIS?!
HOW ODD>
|
scholar
|
|
response 79 of 133:
|
Jan 10 13:08 UTC 2006 |
whoa!
it seems to be back in mississauga?!
|
tod
|
|
response 80 of 133:
|
Jan 10 16:53 UTC 2006 |
Your flashlight is a slut and making the rounds.
|
scholar
|
|
response 81 of 133:
|
Jan 10 18:59 UTC 2006 |
:(
|
naftee
|
|
response 82 of 133:
|
Jan 10 21:30 UTC 2006 |
:(
|