You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   32-56   57-81       
 
Author Message
25 new of 81 responses total.
albaugh
response 57 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 8 17:43 UTC 2004

I don't care if grex is/isn't xenophobic or Xena the Warrior System.
Labeling it doesn't advance your argument a whit.
mooncat
response 58 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 8 18:20 UTC 2004

re #56- well Duh, I've been on Grex forever... So yeah, define 
xenophobia for me, wouldja sweetie? :)
mfp
response 59 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 8 18:22 UTC 2004

The quality which you support but you don't REALIZe you support it.
naftee
response 60 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 8 19:24 UTC 2004

YEAH, LIKE IN GEORGE ORWELL"S 1984>
mooncat
response 61 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 8 21:03 UTC 2004

But what does Xenophobia MEAN!? :)
mfp
response 62 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 9 00:26 UTC 2004

Yes, xenophobia IS mean.
scott
response 63 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 9 00:59 UTC 2004

If Grex was xenophobic, there wouldn't be a "newuser" program.
mfp
response 64 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 9 01:06 UTC 2004

Nonon.

Nono.

Because people can get an account but then they can't be a full part of
society.  That's what xenophobia has always been about.  Foreigners are
welcome to come to America, but there are certain xenophobic SHIBBOLETHS
created  to prevent them from ever fitting in completely.  This is found
inthings like WELCOME TO AMERICA>  NOW< SPEAK ENGLISH!  This is found in
things like denying them certain rights, like voting and outgoing telnet
priviledges.
scott
response 65 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 9 02:48 UTC 2004

Re 64:  No.  Wrong.
mfp
response 66 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 9 03:05 UTC 2004

No.  Wrong.
keesan
response 67 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 9 13:59 UTC 2004

Would xenophobic mean not allowing new users from places like India?
mfp
response 68 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 9 19:22 UTC 2004

No.  It would mean making difficult and costly for them to become full members
of the community when native full members of the community have no such
problems.
naftee
response 69 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 9 20:45 UTC 2004

FOr instance, my name was changed in a xenophobic manner; without contact.
gregb
response 70 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 18:17 UTC 2004

Re. 64:  I think you and Naftee need to look up the word cuz neither 
of your examples fit the written definition.

Grex is not preventing anyone to become a full member.  They're 
specifying conditions by which a person can become full members.  If 
people don't want to fulfill these specifications, that's _their_ 
choice.  We may or may not agree with these rules, but in the end 
that's irrelevant.  Why?  Because those who sent in their ID's agreed 
to follow Grex's ID rule, so there's no incentive for them to change 
it.  In the end, it comes down to, "If you don't like the show, change 
the channel."
tod
response 71 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 18:25 UTC 2004

Why is there such a tendency for folks to tell each other to leave Grex?
Can you imagine if GW went around saying "If you don't like the way we are
running things, leave the country"?
twenex
response 72 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 14 00:07 UTC 2004

I thought that's what he WAS saying...
gregb
response 73 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 14 17:22 UTC 2004

And there was the saying once, "America:  Love it or leave it."  Though
I don't know its origin.
mooncat
response 74 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 14 18:21 UTC 2004

re #71- It's more along the lines of showing choice. People make a 
choice to be here, if a person doesn't like the rules as they are 
determined they are free to leave. Of course the other option is to try 
to change the rules. 
pfv
response 75 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 17:22 UTC 2004

"Xenophobic" aka "racist"?

Cool, now I can watch libs fight libs - while knowing that ID is nothing
remotely "evil".

<snort>

naftee
response 76 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 06:36 UTC 2004

Why don't you try to learn English first.
mfp
response 77 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 16:35 UTC 2004

He's Chinese.
naftee
response 78 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 17:07 UTC 2004

With Libs.
mfp
response 79 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 17:10 UTC 2004

No, that's blacks.
naftee
response 80 of 81: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 05:18 UTC 2004

Oh, okay.
jesuit
response 81 of 81: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:15 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
 0-24   25-49   32-56   57-81       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss