You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   475-499   500-524   525-549   542-566   567-591   592-616   617-641   642-666 
 667-691   692-716   717-741   742-766   767-791   792-816   817-841   842-866   867-870 
 
Author Message
25 new of 870 responses total.
keesan
response 567 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 15:30 UTC 2005

I just got a legitimate email in 8859-9 (Turkish - someone sent me a tel and
I guessed he was Turkish and emailed back what I thought meant 'I don't speak
Turkish' but maybe I left out the 'not') so please don't set the spam filter
to rule out subject lines in other charsets.  I got a 'From' in Chinese
recently and a message body in Russian.  

bbs is working fine.  Procmail just threw out 6 spams in 2 hours and if this
is typical I must be getting about 70/day.  Any progress towards choosing a
spam filter or at least porting Marcus's minimal one?
keesan
response 568 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 16:35 UTC 2005

5 more spams since 10:30 (in one hour).  
albaugh
response 569 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 16:55 UTC 2005

cyberspace.org now yields grex
albaugh
response 570 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 17:29 UTC 2005

&%$&%$&* grex froze while I was entering the following:


I have *no* files on /tmp!!!  The problem is that my filled mailbox, which
apparently mail wants to replicate somewhere while it's running, is larger
than my quota on /tmp - and also larger than my quota in my home directory.
Cannot someone on staff simply pick a larger, more suitable quota on /tmp
to address this situation, and deploy it?  A larger personal quota for me
should also allow me to clean out my mailbox, but it is not addressing the
underlying problem of incorrect settings for mailbox versus /tmp quota.

Note:  I'm not faulting anyone.  But now that we know there's a problem,
it should be corrected.

P.S. Curiously, and different from old grex, since my .forward file has mail
left in my grex mailbox as well as being forwarded off-grex, I continue to
receive the forwarded mail at my non-grex account.  I assume that the messages
are *not* stored in my filled mailbox, and I wonder if senders are getting
"mailbox full" bounces...
keesan
response 571 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 18:12 UTC 2005

My arrow keys on 101 or 84-key keyboard do not work to move around within the
text in fronttalk with vt100 or linux, sshed with linux to grex. [D beep etc.
I will try dialing directly with kermit when that is possible. vt320.
dpc
response 572 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 21:12 UTC 2005

It's great that Grex is up at Provide.Net and that Grex via the Web is 
working fine.  Unfortunately, the dialins are still hosed.  Here is 
what I just got when I tried to log in:

Welcome to Grex!  It may take a few seconds to connect.

Grex is the Midnight Snack of Champs

New to grex?  Type help at the login prompt

groupie.cyberspace.org login: dpc
dpc's Password:
This is NOT grex.  Please use the domain name, not the IP address.

Dial-in Users

End of message.  I have gotten this several times over the past week.  
I have no idea what "groupie.cyberspace.org" is.  Also, the "Dial-in 
Users" line was truncated, and I was promptly logged off.  I was 
dialing 761-3000, so I am sure that I did in fact reach Grex.

What's happening here?
davel
response 573 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 21:26 UTC 2005

Re 572:
kingjon reports the same thing, as of (I think) last night.
gelinas
response 574 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 22:12 UTC 2005

What's happening is that "groupie" is now using the IP address that used to
belong to "grex."  I *tried* to tell the terminal server to use the new IP
address for grex, but it doesn't seem to have taken.  I'll try again.

The machine known as "groupie" was known as "grex" until a month ago, BTW.  I
put it back on its old address because we need a name server at that address
until I get the domain name registry updated.

I'll post the full text of its "nologin" file as soon as I can log on to
groupie.
bru
response 575 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 01:32 UTC 2005

havign a problem loging in just now vie telnet.
cobalt
response 576 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 03:28 UTC 2005

Now experiencing dns name resolution timeouts for lynx and links.
Thank you for your attention to this.
mcnally
response 577 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 04:35 UTC 2005

 Similar delays (presumably DNS timeouts) earlier today when launching pine.
 No delay just now.
gelinas
response 578 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 04:37 UTC 2005

The full text of groupie's "nologin" file is:

This is NOT grex.  Please use the domain name, not the IP address.

Dial-in Users:  It will take a little bit longer to get the terminal
server properly configured.  We apologise for the inconvenience.
                                                        - Grex Staff.
cobalt
response 579 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 07:44 UTC 2005

DNS timeouts for LINKS and LYNX
I am posting this only because I see DNS timeouts noted for pine, but there
is no further information.
 Thank you for your attention to this.
cobalt
response 580 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 08:49 UTC 2005

If someone has time, could they
please test LINKS access to 
www.google.com
and attempt to "sign on" (even if
you do not have an account).
The link is https and the failure
reports "no route to host."

LYNX still attempts to access old server proxy?
Making HTTP connection to 216.93.104.35
?
Any information on this ?
Thanks (everyone).
albaugh
response 581 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 18:54 UTC 2005

BTW, for better or worse, my filled up mailbox, which I can't access *still*
due to the /tmp quota, keeps increasing in size.  So incoming messages
continued to be added to it, even though admonition messages seem to imply
that they won't be.
keesan
response 582 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 04:23 UTC 2005

Could someone please kill the pgreen and erica accounts?
I type bbs and get 'I don't understand "pgreen" and (no conf).
Fronttalk works but I still get this message and one about erica, 2x each.
cobalt
response 583 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 04:26 UTC 2005

I have now confirmed that LINKS cannot access any https links;
can this feature be activated/toggled ?
Hope someone can help when there is time.
keesan
response 584 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 04:27 UTC 2005

When I do r n and there are new responses, using fronttalk, it automatically
scrolls to the last page so I lose the first part unless I scroll back up.
I don't recall this happening before - vandalism?  NOt that I have been using
ft until now.
naftee
response 585 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 05:32 UTC 2005

That's what happens when you use less as your pager and you run a twit
filter.  
gelinas
response 586 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 07:36 UTC 2005

The problem is that the "twit filter" line in your .cfonce has been broken
into three lines.  Rejoin it into one and your problem whould go away.

Killing other people's accoutns will do nothing to make the error you are
seing go away.
keesan
response 587 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 17:01 UTC 2005

Thanks, that fixed it.  I would not need to edit .cfonce with pico -w if the
twits did not have multiple personalities.  How did you figure this out?
Is there some way to read the last response in an item if it is not new, other
than r, q, then the number of the last response?
albaugh
response 588 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 18:33 UTC 2005

Thanks to Joe-of-staff for addressing my mailbox problem.
scholar
response 589 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 22:21 UTC 2005

Thanks, Joe!
drew
response 590 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 03:07 UTC 2005

The dial-ins are still giving me "This is NOT Grex...".
gelinas
response 591 of 870: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 05:07 UTC 2005

I used "less" on your .cfonce, Sindi.

In picospan, I use "r X new" and then "-1".  In FrontTalk, I use "r X nor"
and then "-1".
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   475-499   500-524   525-549   542-566   567-591   592-616   617-641   642-666 
 667-691   692-716   717-741   742-766   767-791   792-816   817-841   842-866   867-870 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss