|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 121 responses total. |
jaklumen
|
|
response 56 of 121:
| 
Aug 30 07:00 UTC 2003 |
never seen void, so I would have no idea.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 57 of 121:
|
Sep 1 01:52 UTC 2003 |
Well, it does, so now you _do_ have an idea. ;)
|
oval
|
|
response 58 of 121:
|
Sep 1 14:38 UTC 2003 |
for reasons of privacy i am unable to post my photograph, hence the portrait.
i ahve another more lifelike portrait also which also resembles me. i request
this be included, and i'm sorry i won't send a real photo, it's not because
i am shy.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 59 of 121:
|
Sep 2 02:38 UTC 2003 |
well, shucks! Not to nitpick and all, but can you explain how a photo
would be compromising your privacy (folks would be beating down your
door)? I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just trying to get your
personal perspective.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 60 of 121:
|
Sep 2 02:49 UTC 2003 |
Maybe she has a stalker, and doesn't want to be identified?
|
oval
|
|
response 61 of 121:
|
Sep 2 14:24 UTC 2003 |
for reasons of privacy i cannot answer this question ;P
|
michaela
|
|
response 62 of 121:
|
Sep 2 15:52 UTC 2003 |
My friend was an undercover cop for a while, and he was not allowed to
let anyone take a picture of him for any reason.
Some jobs have pretty strict rules. There's also the witness protection
program. :)
|
sholmes
|
|
response 63 of 121:
|
Sep 2 15:55 UTC 2003 |
I am also an undercover cop .. the pic on the site is not my own :)
|
cross
|
|
response 64 of 121:
|
Sep 2 16:21 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
bru
|
|
response 65 of 121:
|
Sep 2 16:31 UTC 2003 |
we aren't allowed to let anyone take our pictures on the border, either.
|
tod
|
|
response 66 of 121:
|
Sep 2 16:47 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 67 of 121:
|
Sep 2 22:53 UTC 2003 |
Whatever. My imagination is running wild now.
|
oval
|
|
response 68 of 121:
|
Sep 3 16:49 UTC 2003 |
geez, tod, how'd you guess?!?!
|
tod
|
|
response 69 of 121:
|
Sep 3 17:07 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 70 of 121:
|
Sep 3 18:44 UTC 2003 |
Mullet version of void? I might just have that picture removed :P
(What I really thought cool was the busty upper body option that site
offered when building your lego person. Really cool ;: )
|
tod
|
|
response 71 of 121:
|
Sep 3 20:24 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 72 of 121:
|
Sep 3 20:41 UTC 2003 |
lego my eggo
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 73 of 121:
|
Sep 3 21:18 UTC 2003 |
bust=porn?
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 74 of 121:
|
Sep 4 01:05 UTC 2003 |
It was in how it was said.
|
scg
|
|
response 75 of 121:
|
Sep 4 07:16 UTC 2003 |
If undercover cops can't have their pictures taken, wouldn't an undercover
cop refusing to have their picture taken blow their cover?
|
tod
|
|
response 76 of 121:
|
Sep 4 11:13 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 77 of 121:
|
Sep 4 13:49 UTC 2003 |
Re #75: Good point. I'll remember that if I ever need to figure out
whether someone is a cop. ;>
|
oval
|
|
response 78 of 121:
|
Sep 4 15:03 UTC 2003 |
whats the site where you can make your lego person?
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 79 of 121:
|
Sep 4 16:03 UTC 2003 |
Just for you Carrie, I dug it up -
http://www.reasonablyclever.com/mini/index.html
|
oval
|
|
response 80 of 121:
|
Sep 4 21:50 UTC 2003 |
aww, thanks
|