|
Grex > Coop13 > #72: Valerie Leaves Discussion Item! | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 11 new of 64 responses total. |
jmsaul
|
|
response 54 of 64:
|
Feb 8 07:01 UTC 2004 |
Re #51: A lot of people don't agree that the person who starts an item
should have the right to delete the entire item. Once others have
posted, the item is a group work, and is not their property any
more.
And no, they aren't deleted with any regularity.
|
naftee
|
|
response 55 of 64:
|
Feb 22 23:14 UTC 2004 |
I THINK WE SHOULD START A NEW TREND GUYS :: SCRIBBLE YOUR OLD RESPONSES_ THEN
RE-POST THEM! HEREL: I'LL START IN THE NEXT ITEM.
|
naftee
|
|
response 56 of 64:
|
Feb 22 23:17 UTC 2004 |
GUYS' SOMEONE TELL ME AN AUTOMATED METHOD
|
rational
|
|
response 57 of 64:
|
Feb 23 00:58 UTC 2004 |
MOIDIFY VALERIE"S SCRIBBLE PROGRAMME
|
naftee
|
|
response 58 of 64:
|
Feb 6 08:52 UTC 2005 |
WHOA> YEAH< DO IT
|
scholar
|
|
response 59 of 64:
|
Feb 6 18:12 UTC 2005 |
UNLUCKY!
|
jesuit
|
|
response 60 of 64:
|
May 17 02:14 UTC 2006 |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
|
gelinas
|
|
response 61 of 64:
|
Nov 18 02:19 UTC 2006 |
Looks like it is in fronttalk:
} Ok: part other
}
}
} other Fri Nov 17 12:24:35 2006 Eric the Plush
}
} 1 participant total.
}
} Ok: part spooked
}
} loginid last time on name
}
} spooked Fri Nov 17 20:21:23 2006 Michelangelo Giansiracusa
}
} 1 participant total.
}
} Ok:
|
spooked
|
|
response 62 of 64:
|
Nov 18 03:01 UTC 2006 |
Another good reason to move to modern, open-source software.
|
kingjon
|
|
response 63 of 64:
|
Nov 18 18:29 UTC 2006 |
My dad (a former staff member) wrote me an email:
> (It's been a few years, but I *think* that the way the part command worked
> in picospan was not by checking whether one had posted, but by scanning
> all users' directories for a participation file for the particular
> conference.
> It was hideously slow, IIRC. And if the file was in a directory without
> proper permissions, it wouldn't report it. I could be wrong, but that's
> my memory of how it worked.)
|
spooked
|
|
response 64 of 64:
|
Nov 18 21:56 UTC 2006 |
It's a poor implementation - regardless of its intended purpose.
|