You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   29-53   54-64       
 
Author Message
11 new of 64 responses total.
jmsaul
response 54 of 64: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 07:01 UTC 2004

Re #51:  A lot of people don't agree that the person who starts an item
         should have the right to delete the entire item.  Once others have
         posted, the item is a group work, and is not their property any
         more.

         And no, they aren't deleted with any regularity.
naftee
response 55 of 64: Mark Unseen   Feb 22 23:14 UTC 2004

I THINK WE SHOULD START A NEW TREND GUYS ::  SCRIBBLE YOUR OLD RESPONSES_ THEN
RE-POST THEM!   HEREL:  I'LL START IN THE NEXT ITEM.
naftee
response 56 of 64: Mark Unseen   Feb 22 23:17 UTC 2004

GUYS'  SOMEONE TELL ME AN AUTOMATED METHOD
rational
response 57 of 64: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 00:58 UTC 2004

MOIDIFY VALERIE"S SCRIBBLE PROGRAMME
naftee
response 58 of 64: Mark Unseen   Feb 6 08:52 UTC 2005

WHOA> YEAH< DO IT
scholar
response 59 of 64: Mark Unseen   Feb 6 18:12 UTC 2005

UNLUCKY!
jesuit
response 60 of 64: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:14 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
gelinas
response 61 of 64: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 02:19 UTC 2006

Looks like it is in fronttalk:

} Ok: part other
} 
} 
}      other Fri Nov 17 12:24:35 2006 Eric the Plush
} 
} 1 participant total.
} 
} Ok: part spooked
} 
}    loginid        last time on      name
} 
}    spooked Fri Nov 17 20:21:23 2006 Michelangelo Giansiracusa
} 
} 1 participant total.
} 
} Ok:
spooked
response 62 of 64: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 03:01 UTC 2006

Another good reason to move to modern, open-source software.

kingjon
response 63 of 64: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 18:29 UTC 2006

My dad (a former staff member) wrote me an email:

> (It's been a few years, but I *think* that the way the part command worked
> in picospan was not by checking whether one had posted, but by scanning
> all users' directories for a participation file for the particular
> conference.
> It was hideously slow, IIRC.  And if the file was in a directory without
> proper permissions, it wouldn't report it.  I could be wrong, but that's
> my memory of how it worked.)

spooked
response 64 of 64: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 21:56 UTC 2006

It's a poor implementation - regardless of its intended purpose.
 0-24   25-49   29-53   54-64       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss