You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   28-52   53-77   78-102   103-122     
 
Author Message
25 new of 122 responses total.
davel
response 53 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 12 21:34 UTC 2003

John, TBH, NextGrex looks to me to be moving along at least as fast as
previous upgrades have.  It really feels to me like you're carping, not
because you're saying that it should go faster, but because you keep saying
it over & over & over.

Volunteer time is always a bottleneck.  Trying to run a system, including
upgrades & maintenance, on the basis of consensus rather than in a top-down
manager-to-managed structure adds to the problem.

Frankly, if I were on staff & were one of those trying to move ahead on
this, I'd be resenting the sheer time taken up reading the responses of a
few individuals who apparently have endless time and nothing of importance
(IMNAAHO) to say. Heck, I do resent it as it is, & I'm not even seeing most
of their postings, I think.  (No, you're not one of those I'm referring to;
my first paragraph above isn't meant to say that I think you're in the twit
category.  If it sounds to you like that, email me & I'll try to be clearer.)
tod
response 54 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 12 23:43 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

jep
response 55 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 13 03:08 UTC 2003

re resp:53: Sorry if you don't think I should speak up.  But not sorry 
enough to shut up.  If there are X people who think I shouldn't say 
what's on my mind, then there are X people who's opinion I don't care 
about.

I think there are many who disagree with me, but I think there are 
some who agree, too -- however graceless they might think me for 
saying it as bluntly as I did.

Look, I like Grex a whole lot.  I have read the statements from the 
treasurer over the last couple of years, as Grex went from 100 
supporters and a growing bank account to 80 supporters and a shrinking 
bank account.  Why do you think that is?  I have an idea that explains 
at least part of it.  I get frustrated when I wait for the system to 
do the next thing; go to the next conference or finish entering an 
item or whatever.  So must others.

Those users who left aren't going to come back, and the next dozen who 
leave aren't coming back, and it won't be long before Grex is where M-
Net is now.  (If there are 10 supporting users on M-Net, I'm 
surprised.)  Or where the old Arbornet was before that (there were 4 
users of Arbornet when it merged with M-Net).  I don't think the 
MextGrex hardware is depreciating as quickly as is Grex itself.

I want NextGrex for myself.  I want it because I think it's cool to 
think of Grex moving onto something a little less obsolete.  It's new, 
different, and exciting.  But there *is* a bigger picture as well.
jp2
response 56 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 13 03:22 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mary
response 57 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 13 13:10 UTC 2003

Dan, that's a generous offer.  Please run it by staff, soon.
gull
response 58 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 13 19:40 UTC 2003

Re resp:55: Cracking the whip over volunteer staff people and saying,
"work harder, damn it!" generally isn't very effective, unless your goal
is to drive away volunteers.  Do you have any constructive suggestions,
or just complaints?
cross
response 59 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 13 22:24 UTC 2003

Regarding #57; I assume all the staff who want to participate are reading
this.
gelinas
response 60 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 00:26 UTC 2003

I suspect your assmption is faulty, Dan.  Unfortunately, for all concerned.
jep
response 61 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 01:34 UTC 2003

re resp:58:  Do you know how long we went between *mentions* of 
NextGrex in the coop conference?  We went from July to October, when I 
brought up the subject again.  And the mentions in June and July 
weren't substantive, as I recall them.

Constructive?  I don't have any attaboys, no.

I think we should listen more to cross, if he'll come back to the 
staff at all.  I think we need to go with stock Unix, not customized 
code only a couple of people can administer -- because those couple of 
people haven't been available for a while.

I think Grex shouldn't be allowed to wither on the vine because of 
overdependence on people who aren't interested in it any more.

Do *you* have *anything* to contribute?  Or just "Shut up, jep"?

re 59-60: I suspect it's a matter of definition of "want to 
participate".
glenda
response 62 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 03:12 UTC 2003

I thought that there is on going stuff about NextGrex in the Garage cf, not
here.
jep
response 63 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 04:04 UTC 2003

View hidden response.

jep
response 64 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 04:05 UTC 2003

Oops.

Through May, there was extensive discussion of everything happening 
with NextGrex here in coop.  Then it abruptly stopped.
naftee
response 65 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 04:53 UTC 2003

BOOM
 NextGreX
willcome
response 66 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 06:20 UTC 2003

Did you boom NextGreX?
gull
response 67 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 16:07 UTC 2003

Re resp:61: I didn't ask for "attaboys".  I asked for constructive
comments, i.e. ones that include suggestions for how to move forward. 
"That damn volunteer staff is lazy" seems to be your only comment so
far, and it's not constructive or helpful.
davel
response 68 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 18:53 UTC 2003

And John, as I said, my objection to it is that you keep saying it, over &
over & over.  I guess what David (gull) just said is relevant, though; if you
were offering constructive suggestions or offering to help along with this
it wouldn't sound so much like carping.  (I offer as an example cross, who
has complained quite a bit about the rate of progress from time to time, but
who's been involved & (AFAICS) quite helpful.
cross
response 69 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 21:17 UTC 2003

Regarding #60; Fair enough, Joe; can you help me spread the word?  The
critical people to get hold of right now are Jan and Valerie, since the
hardware is physically in their possession.
gelinas
response 70 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 15 03:49 UTC 2003

I'll see what I can do.
jep
response 71 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 15 05:47 UTC 2003

I guess I disagree with davel and gull in that I think there are valid 
reasons to complain.  Maybe you fellows will come up with a schedule 
under which I may complain again with your permission?  I inquired in 
October and was told "wait a month".  I waited two months before 
complaining.

I don't have the time or expertise needed to make NextGrex.  That is 
why I never said I'd do it.

Dan Cross has stated the project can be simplified to the point where 
any Unix system administrator could understand it, instead of only one 
person, by eliminating weird custom password code and suchlike.  I 
endorse that concept.  Grex will be a lot more secure with standard 
Unix software than it ever will when relying on one person.

While I don't have the expertise to build NextGrex, I do have Unix 
knowledge and ability which could conceivably help.  I was on the 
staff of M-Net for several years.  I am the Unix root at work on some 
machines, though for maintenance purposes only.  I'm the go-to guy in 
customer support for Unix information.  I'm willing to help out Grex 
and/or NextGrex where I can.  I won't be designing any software but 
there are times when I could log in and test things, or clean up after 
busier and more expert people, etc.  I'm pretty good at 
documentation.  I don't expect the staff to take me up on it, but if 
they do, I'll help out where I can.

If it counts at all toward your definition of "helping", davel, I also 
contributed money to the new hardware project a year ago.  I really 
don't regard myself as destructively jeering.  
mary
response 72 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 15 22:51 UTC 2003

I'd like to explain, in a bit more detail, why I brought this up in the
first place. 

Jobs for programmers are tight right now.  Or so I've heard, right here on
Grex, from programmers.  I think it was Jan who said he's been forced to
take work at a much reduced fee, to get the contract.  That means he's
working more hours to make the same income to meet his bills. Yuck.

I don't think it's just Jan that's been caught in this squeeze.  I think
it's a lot of our volunteer staff. Then you throw in the usual family
obligations that all of us have, some more than others, and before you
know it, Grex projects are on the back burner.  In the past our staff has
been very generous with their time.  I think they'll be generous again,
when they're able. 

So maybe it is both practical and realistic to think of jump starting the
project by paying for the next few hours of work.  And that's all it would
be, the next few hours.  Just enough to get past this bottleneck.  Then
(cross fingers) maybe voluteers with more time could pickup the slack. 
But we'll have to see how that goes.  But any progress right now would be
an upper for the whole project. 

I hope it works that Dan can get things going before he leaves.  But, if
not, I'd like this to be considered.

cross
response 73 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 15 23:02 UTC 2003

I don't think it's very practical.  It's a noble gesture, to be sure, but
realistically grex isn't going to be able to afford much time from anyone.
What I think is realistic, and necessary, is to get an operating system
loaded onto the hardware we have that's *stable* and get the hardware into
the pumpkin.  After that, most of the work with getting nextgrex running
is really just turning the crank.
bhoward
response 74 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 15 23:35 UTC 2003

I believe there are grexers willing and capable of helping finish off the
configuration of nextgrex if we can simply get it on line and accessable
via the net.  I'm happy to help out, I believe others have made the same
offer.

If Dan can help with the first part, I think amongst the lot of us,
we can sort out the rest.
jp2
response 75 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 16 00:00 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 76 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 16 00:24 UTC 2003

I guess the job market isn't tight where jp2 is. ;>
jp2
response 77 of 122: Mark Unseen   Dec 16 00:40 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   28-52   53-77   78-102   103-122     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss