You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   475-499   479-503   504-528   529-547      
 
Author Message
25 new of 547 responses total.
gelinas
response 504 of 547: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 04:11 UTC 2003

What's the big deal with Picospan?  From what I've heard, Marcus has control
of the source.  He can put it where he wants.  Switching now doesn't gain us
anything.
cross
response 505 of 547: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 04:57 UTC 2003

Maybe my understanding is flawed.  It's that we don't really have a legal
license for it, Marcus sort of has a copy of the source as an artifact, and
the legalities of it all are really rather fuzzy, and he doesn't have much
control over the source at all.  If the source could be opened up, all of
my objections would evaoprate, but it really seems rather more complex than
that.
remmers
response 506 of 547: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:02 UTC 2003

Re #495 - Intel vs. Sun.  Marcus and STeve are in favor of moving from
Sun to Intel hardware.  In fact, at the meeting where we decided on what
type of hardware to purchase, STeve made that recommendation, speaking
for himself and Marcus.  Subsequent to that, STeve was actively involved
in the hardware acquisition process.

If I had to speculate on the reasons for slow progress - the fact is
that several key staff members had unexpected situations come up in
their lives that limited the time they had available to work on
NextGrex.  I think everyone on staff is committed to getting the
work done and is making an honest effort to do so within the
time constraints they have to deal with.
cmcgee
response 507 of 547: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 15:24 UTC 2003

People who have been with Grex a long time may also be unconsciously comparing
"how long it took to do X" when staff was much younger, had fewer family
members living with them, and had jobs that were less consuming.
cross
response 508 of 547: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 19:08 UTC 2003

Regarding #506; I think the thing that's upsetting some folks, and
perhaps rightfully so, is this idea that there are some staff members
who are `key' at all.  In reality, that's the way it's always going
to be, but that doesn't mean the rest of us should be paralized by
it.
remmers
response 509 of 547: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 19:26 UTC 2003

Right.  But I don't think that's what's been holding things up.
cross
response 510 of 547: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 21:08 UTC 2003

I concur.  I just wanted to attempt to clarify.
jep
response 511 of 547: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 22:00 UTC 2003

A lot of things happen behind the scenes, where most of us don't know 
anything about them.  When it looks like nothing is happening, that 
can be frustrating.  We all had a lot of expectations, I think, and 
everyone cheerfully donated all the money that was asked for... then 
nothing visible happened for months.  That's fine, but I don't feel 
guilty for asking some questions now.

So, there was a staff meeting on Saturday... was there any buy-in to 
Dan's idea of moving ahead?
bhoward
response 512 of 547: Mark Unseen   Oct 28 04:07 UTC 2003

Keep an eye on your mailbox, folks.  My OpenBSD 3.4 CD (and t-shirt)
just arrived 30 minutes ago.  Grex's ought to be arriving any day 
now.
gelinas
response 513 of 547: Mark Unseen   Oct 28 04:39 UTC 2003

John, the staff meeting was on Wednesday, October 22.  The staff report in
the minutes of tonight's BoD meeting pretty much sums up the discussion.

The Next Step is installing OpenBSD 3.4.
jep
response 514 of 547: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 20:09 UTC 2003

The question was asked in general, has OpenBSD 3.4 been installed?
gelinas
response 515 of 547: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 00:40 UTC 2003

Not last I checked.
bhoward
response 516 of 547: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 01:20 UTC 2003

I understand from the earlier discussion that Jan and the other staff
configuring grex have been documenting the configuration in detail.

For folks like myself curious about the technical nitty-gritty, is any
of that documention publicly available yet?
janc
response 517 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 02:53 UTC 2003

I haven't read all of what's above.

I should have a lighter work-load over the holidays, but the kids won't be
in school as much, so I might not have all that much time to work on Grex
either.  Still, I expect to be able to do some work.

Last night I started work on upgrading to OpenBSD 3.4.  It's up and working,
and I am about half way through the business of following the instructions
to redo the installs and configuration changes that had already been
documented.  As I've been working, I've also been updating and clarifying
the install documents.

Mostly the install documents have worked fine.  It's not just documentation.
A lot of it is custom scripts.  So setting up the /suidbin partition, moving
appropriate suid files to it and replacing the old copies with symbolic links
took about 7 minutes.  Full install and setup of party took four commands and
four minutes (most of the time to ftp the source over).  Configuring Apache
and the external authenticator took about 4 minutes too.  There are still
some glitches - my scripts to install Orville-Write seem to have failed. 
However, the goal is to be able to build a new Grex in fairly short order,
and we've made good progress toward that.

I don't have a good way to make these documents public right now.  It's
nothing amazingly interesting.

One bit of good news - I've done lots of reboots as I installed stuff, rebuilt
kernels, and such.  So far the ethernet interface has initialized correctly
every time.  I don't know if the ethernet driver got fixed in the 3.4 release,
or if my new router just plays better with OpenBSD, but it looks like this
issue is solved.

Right now I'm just playing catch-up to get the system back to where it was
before we upgraded to 3.4.  I hope to get a substantial amount of forward
progress done over the holidays.  I hope other staff members will too.
cross
response 518 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 04:02 UTC 2003

Great!  Okay, how about relocating the machine to the pumpkin?
janc
response 519 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 20 01:39 UTC 2003

For the next few weeks, I'll likely have some time to work on the thing.
I don't know what advantage moving it to the pumpkin would have, at least
during that time period.  However, if there is any strength of opinion
favoring that, I'd actually love to have it off my desk.  It's fans are
loud and it takes up scarce desk space.
cross
response 520 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 20 03:42 UTC 2003

If it's coming up on the network reliably now, the advantage is that
(a) we an test out network services other than those that you poke holes
in your firewall for, and (b) it's closer to oldgrex, and (c) it's already
in place for when grex shifts to it.
gelinas
response 521 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 20 04:08 UTC 2003

All good reasons, but I'd like to see it a bit closer to being ready for use
before moving it.  I'd like to see it move early in January, earlier if
possible.
mary
response 522 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 20 13:15 UTC 2003

Thanks, Jan.
janc
response 523 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 21 17:43 UTC 2003

Actually being able to make it accessible via http and smtp and things like
that may be useful for testing.  Well, for other people.  I can access those
services just fine :).

I'll move it as soon as any staff member says they'd find it easier to do
their work if it was moved, or at the end of the first week of January, at
which point I'm booting it out my house no matter what state it is in.
cross
response 524 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 21 19:58 UTC 2003

I think it'd be a lot easier to set up a decent mail configuration if it were
moved earlier.
janc
response 525 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 21 20:20 UTC 2003

OK.
janc
response 526 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 21 20:22 UTC 2003

However, before we move it out from behind my firewall, we need to check
that this isn't going to be a security problem.  Are there any services
we need to turn off?
jp2
response 527 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 21 20:48 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 528 of 547: Mark Unseen   Dec 21 20:51 UTC 2003

I would find http useful.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   475-499   479-503   504-528   529-547      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss