|
Grex > Agora56 > #105: State: Wal-Mart must carry emergency contraception | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 526 responses total. |
tod
|
|
response 501 of 526:
| 
Mar 12 03:06 UTC 2006 |
re #500
Sabbath ends at sundown, D00d
|
happyboy
|
|
response 502 of 526:
|
Mar 12 20:16 UTC 2006 |
the sun goes down
AND THE BOWLIN SHOES COME OUT!
|
nharmon
|
|
response 503 of 526:
|
Mar 12 20:27 UTC 2006 |
You get no RUUUUUUUUSH from Bowling.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 504 of 526:
|
Mar 12 23:06 UTC 2006 |
/smokes a cuban cigar just like rush limbaugh
|
tod
|
|
response 505 of 526:
|
Mar 13 02:15 UTC 2006 |
Joseph and the Technicolor Bowling Shoes
|
gull
|
|
response 506 of 526:
|
Mar 18 01:08 UTC 2006 |
Re resp:498: Either he jettisoned them to run with Al Gore, or he
jettisoned them to cozy up to Bush. I'm not sure which because I don't
know what his original principles actually are. Either way, it sounds
like neither of us has much respect for him.
|
klg
|
|
response 507 of 526:
|
Mar 18 23:39 UTC 2006 |
2 more women die after taking abortion pill
FDA issues alert; rare infection is suspected
By Jonathan D. Rockoff
Tribune Newspapers: Baltimore Sun
Published March 18, 2006
WASHINGTON -- Two more women who took the abortion pill RU-486 have
died, according to federal drug regulators who are investigating whether
the same rare infection that caused four earlier deaths was responsible.
In announcing the two additional cases Friday, the Food and Drug
Administration issued an alert urging doctors and patients to follow
approved directions for the drug, which is used in combination with
another medication, and look for symptoms warranting immediate
attention.
The agency did not provide further details about the two deaths, which
followed reports that four women in California died from septic shock
since 2003 after undergoing medical abortions, as the procedure for
using RU-486 is called.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 508 of 526:
|
Mar 19 01:46 UTC 2006 |
Now if Plan B were widely availab,e fewer women would need such
medications like RU-486.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 509 of 526:
|
Mar 19 01:51 UTC 2006 |
A deeper investigation of the deaths disclosed that there is a second drug
that also needs to be taken. The distinction in terms of health outcomes
appears to be whether or not the second drug is taken orally or vaginally.
Don't hold your breath waiting for the anti-RU486 crowd to grasp that
subtlety, however.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 510 of 526:
|
Mar 19 01:57 UTC 2006 |
the earth is 5000 years old, blasfeemur.
why do you want to abort baby jesus?
you fucker.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 511 of 526:
|
Mar 19 03:01 UTC 2006 |
Happyboy needs to stop spending so much time with jvmv
|
slynne
|
|
response 512 of 526:
|
Mar 19 03:36 UTC 2006 |
I wonder how the death rate of RU-482 compares to the death rate of
actual child birth?
|
tod
|
|
response 513 of 526:
|
Mar 19 03:59 UTC 2006 |
Both are punishment for whores. G0D HAT3S FAGS! DIE TROOPS DIE! Seig HEIL!
|
rcurl
|
|
response 514 of 526:
|
Mar 19 07:17 UTC 2006 |
People also die due to other medication, or surgery - and there are no deaths
from the RU-486 procedure if the FDA guidelines are followed. That news bit
is irrelevant to the discussion of abortion.
|
gull
|
|
response 515 of 526:
|
Mar 20 02:41 UTC 2006 |
I've noticed a lot of people seem to confuse Plan B with RU-486. I
wonder how much of the opposition to Plan B is due to that confusion?
|
rcurl
|
|
response 516 of 526:
|
Mar 20 06:46 UTC 2006 |
Both limit reproduction. That is enough for some people to oppose.
|
jep
|
|
response 517 of 526:
|
Mar 20 13:32 UTC 2006 |
I'm as much against RU-486 as I am against any other abortion.
I was uninformed about Plan B and started out against it. I've now
moved to a neutral position. I am not sure if I should consider it to
be an abortion. If it is not killing a fetus, then I am not against it.
|
slynne
|
|
response 518 of 526:
|
Mar 20 15:11 UTC 2006 |
Plan B does not kill a fetus. From what I understand, it prevents an
egg from being fertalized.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 519 of 526:
|
Mar 20 15:31 UTC 2006 |
I am not opposed to the use of Plan B, and somewhat neutral on RU-486.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 520 of 526:
|
Mar 20 15:32 UTC 2006 |
Now... 80486 on the other hand, I am totally against.
|
keesan
|
|
response 521 of 526:
|
Mar 20 16:06 UTC 2006 |
Something a few days old is not a fetus, it is an embryo.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 522 of 526:
|
Mar 20 16:15 UTC 2006 |
No, but since RU-486 is effective in the first two months of pregnancy,
and the embryonic stage ends on the 6th weeks, there are two weeks
where RU-486 could be used to abort a fetus.
What happens when RU486 is taken after the first two months of
pregnancy?
|
albaugh
|
|
response 523 of 526:
|
Mar 21 21:49 UTC 2006 |
blasfemur, there's got to be a bone pun in there somewhere... ;-)
|
gull
|
|
response 524 of 526:
|
Apr 1 08:43 UTC 2006 |
Re resp:518: I thought it worked by preventing implantation of the egg
into the uterine lining.
|
slynne
|
|
response 525 of 526:
|
Apr 1 11:50 UTC 2006 |
resp:524 It does that too. This is from the FDA's PlanB website
" Plan B works like other birth control pills to prevent pregnancy. Plan
B acts primarily by stopping the release of an egg from the ovary
(ovulation). It may prevent the union of sperm and egg (fertilization).
If fertilization does occur, Plan B may prevent a fertilized egg from
attaching to the womb (implantation). If a fertilized egg is implanted
prior to taking Plan B, Plan B will not work. "
http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/planB/planBQandA.htm
|