You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-86       
 
Author Message
25 new of 86 responses total.
bru
response 50 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 19:36 UTC 2004

But, I am not only worried about me.  In fact, I am not worried about me at
all.  What I am worried about are the parents who use TV as a babysitter, adn
don't pay attention to what their children are watching.

When I was growing up, parents didn't have to worry about what I was watching
on TV.  It was all fairly wholesome.  Nowdays, you have to be aware that many
programs are either violent or perverse.
gull
response 51 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 19:39 UTC 2004

Maybe parents shouldn't be letting TV do their parenting for them.

What ever happened to individual responsibility?
jp2
response 52 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 19:40 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

other
response 53 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 19:44 UTC 2004

49:  Those numbers are not enough to make the case.  Try the top one 
hundred grossing films of the last forty years.
jp2
response 54 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 19:56 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

tod
response 55 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 20:00 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jp2
response 56 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 20:05 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

other
response 57 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 20:07 UTC 2004

Ok, the last 35 years.  Whatever.
marcvh
response 58 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 20:08 UTC 2004

You would also have to control for the proportions of each types of movies 
made, and whether the reason some movies make more money is because of
their content or because of the rating itself.
tod
response 59 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 20:10 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

ryan
response 60 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 20:15 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

krj
response 61 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 20:17 UTC 2004

regarding several previous responses:  Inflation-adjusted box-office 
lists are available at boxofficemojo.com and at washingtonpost.com.
sorry I haven't got the exact URL immediately at hand, but the 
list at http://boxofficemojo.com is very easy to find.

The inflation-adjusted lists agree much more with my idea of what 
popular American film culture is, or should be.

I know Eric's in The Business, but everything I see in the 
mainstream press says that 
the conventional wisdom is that PG-13 is the optimum rating for 
financial success, for any single film.  There was a lot of fuss 
in 2003 when the Matrix sequels became the first R-rated films 
to break the $200 million level.  My perception is that over the 
last few years the number of "mainstream" R-rated films has dwindled.

I remind folks this is the Grammy Awards item, and not the Super Bowl item
or the Janet Jackson item.  :/
jp2
response 62 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 20:17 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

klg
response 63 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 20:23 UTC 2004

O.K., Mr. other.  Do you give up yet?

Top 20 Grossing Movies by Rating  (Top 100 Since 1998)

Year    G       PG      PG-13   R
2002    1       6       13      0
2001    2       4       10      4
2000    0       3       12      5
1999    2       3       7       8
1998    3       3       9       5
        8       19      51      22
gull
response 64 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 20:40 UTC 2004

Re resp:59: I wonder that, too.  I find the "violence is okay, but sex
is not" attitude kind of odd when I stop to think about it.

Re resp:63: Those numbers square pretty well with what I've heard.  An R
rating is considered somewhat of a negative, but a G rating is
considered the kiss of death for anything but a children's film.  I've
heard in some cases studios will intentionally notch up the content of a
film so it will get a PG or PG-13 instead of a G, just like they'll
sometimes tone it down to get a PG-13 instead of an R.
anderyn
response 65 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 20:46 UTC 2004

Speaking as a parent, I did in fact raise my children without letting tv be
the babysitter. There was only one tv in the house and if they were watching,
so was a parent.  If there was any violence or nudity that went beyond my
comfort boundaries, off it went. (And I admit it, I am a big prude. Sex in
movies -- even the PG13 varieties -- is something that makes me uncomfortable.
Violence in most contexts (unless very clearly sf/fantasy, as in rayguns and
swords) also makes me really uncomfortable. I don't watch it. I carefully read
spoiler reviews of movies so I don't go to things that will make me
uncomfortable, and I tend to like Disney movies A LOT.) I may have made
mistakes as a parent, but I do feel happy that I was careful about this when
they were small.
happyboy
response 66 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 03:43 UTC 2004

i'm glad you're a prude.
rational
response 67 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 03:52 UTC 2004

I'm just glad in general.
other
response 68 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 03:55 UTC 2004

Get out your calendars:  I admit I'm wrong that R rated films 
outsell PG rated according to the numbers you provided.  I'd like to 
ask, however, if those numbers reflect first run, box office only, 
or total earnings. 
gsibbery
response 69 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 13:44 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

tpryan
response 70 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 16:15 UTC 2004

        Considering that their is only 3 ways for an animated
Disney Villian to die (mostly all by their own actins):
1)  Fall of a cliff, ledge or whatnot, from high above to unsurvivable
        below.
2)  Consumed by fire.
3)  Fall of a cliff into a firey pit.
tpryan
response 71 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 16:17 UTC 2004

        I would be interested in profit per rating type.
aruba
response 72 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 23:05 UTC 2004

Right, I was going to say: The statistic you really want, to judge the power
of different types of movies, is the total profit/revenue from R-rated
movies last year vs. the total profit/revenue from PG-13 movies last year.
It might be (I really don't know) that the top few movies are all G/PG-13,
but that there are many more R-rated movies than the rest, and so they make
up the difference in volume.
klg
response 73 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 02:51 UTC 2004

"Profit" is a much more easily manipulated figure, particularly with 
respect to motion pictures.

Further, would not the number of releases by rating category not also 
be relevant??
gull
response 74 of 86: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 15:55 UTC 2004

"Always ask for a piece of the gross, not a piece of the net.  The net
is fantasy." -- Freakazoid.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-86       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss