You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-133     
 
Author Message
25 new of 133 responses total.
power
response 50 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 6 19:57 UTC 1993

  Jemmie, you still sound a lot like the more conservative, musically, people
who were around in the time of the Beatles, etc.  The 60s took music back
a long step, in terms of complexity: compare the simple elegance of 60s
music with the complex rhythms and chord changes of jazz, particularly
beebop.  Yet, it is still popular.  I suspect that it will be the same with
some of the groups around today.  Even when you look at DISCO, the Village
People and the BeeJees still have a small following--YMCA still gets played
a LOT at parties, etc....  Dr. Dre may not be popular on the same level as
the Beatles are, but I think he will still have a following in 20 years...
  I personally much prefer the Doors to the Beatles and Led Zeppelin, although
I agree that maybe they haven't been as influential, at least not as much so
as the Beatles.....

  As for violence in rap vs. violence in grunge/heavy metal/other 'white'
music....  I don't think that rap stars are really any more role models than
grunge or metal stars... you have the same obsession...  And you can look
at the titles of some GNR or Ozzy or Nirvana songs, and get the same effect...
'Pretty Tied Up', 'Suicide Solution', 'Rape Me', 'Moist Vagina'.... :)
'Suck My Kiss', 'Flyin' High Again', 'Shout at the Devil', '666, the
Number of the Beast'...  these are some of the songs that I can think of
off the top of my head/read off of the tapes in my (small) collection, and
I'm not even really into the extremely hard core stuff....

  I haven't heard all that many cases of violence occuring and being
blamed on music, be it grunge or metal or rap or whatever.  The only
cases I can think of off the top of my head, though, are NOT rap.  The
first is some 19 year old who listened to 'Suicide Solutions' for a couple
hours straight and then shot himself (great song, by the way :) )... The
second are the cases of violence against police after 'Cop Killer' came
out (by Body Count, a thrash metal type band, though it is a predominantly
black thrash metal band)....

  I agree that rap reflects black society (why do you think that I would
be upset at you saying black, Hoolie?), but I don't think that it is evil
for its reflection thereof... the news ++0reflects violence in our
for its reflection thereof.... the news reflects violence in our world,
but we don't blame it.....
gregc
response 51 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 13:01 UTC 1993

re #42: Power
I find it amusing that you offer as proof of grunge music's ability to
affect it's fans, the fact of all the people wanering Ann Arbor with 
long hair and goatees! Their has been people wandering Ann Arbor with
long hair and goatees since 1965!
mta
response 52 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 18:41 UTC 1993

In 20 years KTEL will release a Music of the 90's cd featuring Dr. Dre
and the Red Hot Chili Peppers side by side, and your kids and my 
grandkids will moan: "You guys really

Used to listen to that stuff???   eoowwwwwwwwww!!"

Just like mine do now about the Village People and KC and the Sunshine Band.

        ;)

and in forty years a few cuts that no one mentions today will be clasics
and this conversation will sound *very* silly because in retrospect
everyone will realize that the REAL classics went unnoticed in their
own time.
rogue
response 53 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 8 02:27 UTC 1993

#50: "Complexity" never came up because I usually don't judge the quality of
     music by how complex it is. I am not sure why you are bringing it up
     now. Dr.Dre will never, ever, ever in a billion years be half as popular
     as the Beatles were. He might have a following in 20 years, but the size
     of that following is debatable and I doubt many teenagers will be fans.
   
     On a related note, what do you think will happen in 100 years? I contend
     that at least some of the Beatles' music will be around in 100 years and
     *none* of Dr.Dre's will be around. Even Zeppelin will be around in
     2093 and possibly the Doors (but maybe not). Dr.Dre is dust in the
     wind, russ..
hawkeye
response 54 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 8 15:51 UTC 1993

RE: 44.  While certainly Kurt Cobain's heroin addiction is nothing to
emulate, he doesn't *sing about* how great it makes him feel.  This is
the distinction I'm trying to make.
power
response 55 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 02:29 UTC 1993

  51:  There have always been people around AA with long hair and goatees,
I know, but its become much more popular in the last couple years--especially
the goatee thing...  I know--I've had the long hair thing for 6 years or
so, now (longer, counting before the time in 7th grade when I cut it :) ),
and it's finally in style!!! :)
  52:  Yep :)... but they'll still have heard of it, just like our generation
has heard of the Village People :)...  Whether or not they laugh is hard to
tell as of yet--I think that it might be tough to laugh at some of the harder
edge of rap :)....
  53:  I still think that Dr. Dre will have some teenagers in his following
in 20 years--or if not Dr. Dre, some of the hard-core rappers (like mta
said, classics sometimes go unnoticed)...  As for 100 years from now, it's
hard to predict, and I don't think I want to claim to make any predictions...
  54:  I'm not familiar enough with Nirvana to cite songs in which Kurt
Cobain talks about his heroin addiction....  I can cite some other non-rap
songs where the singer talks about how great drugs make him feel, though...
All the way back to the Beatles.......... :)
hawkeye
response 56 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 15:29 UTC 1993

RE #55 -- It's not the point that you can "cite some songs".  You are
trying to make a distinction about a *class* of music.  Sure, you can
pick out "bad" lyrics from almost *any* singer.  This, however, can
not be said to be representative of the entire genre.
 
And while I have nothing against rap, I think it's next-to-impossible
to think that "Dr. Dre" or *any* rap "star" will have a following in
20 years.  Music lasts because of the *tune* -- not the words.  This
is what is missing from rap of today -- that there is no *music* behind
the words (apart from some lifted from other songs).

Perhaps the *novelty* of rap will be around in 20 years, but I find it
difficult to think there will be any "classic rap" recognized by the masses.
power
response 57 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 18:28 UTC 1993

  I don't think that music necessarily lasts entirely because of the tune--
if something needs a tune to last, how does one account for the endurance
of poetry?  Wordsworth has been around for more than *100* years, let alone
20--there's no music there!  Who can say whether the same won't be true
of Dr. Dre or Public Enemy or whoever?  Or, for those who feel I'm blaspheming
romantic poets, The Doors are still listened to, at least in part
because they have some most cool lyrics....
  Not all hard rap glorifies drugs or violence either.  Much of it does,
but so does much of hard rock-type stuff.  Rap and hard rock are equally
violent (particularly so in that I am mostly citing fairly mainstream rock
artists, but we are citing rap which tends towards the violent edge).
  I don't find it at all unlikely that the youth of 20 years from now will
still listen to some of today's rap--at least not any less likely than that
I, an 18 year old of 1993, would listen to the Doors, Black Sabbath, Jimi
Hendrix, and so forth.... which I do.
rogue
response 58 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 00:38 UTC 1993

Hawkeye brings up a point that is very important. Music is admired or
loathed because of the tunes -- thus, "music". Do you know who wrote the
words for Phantom of the Opera? Did the great classical composers live or
did their librettist(s) live? I can't think of a single musical work that
I like or dislike because of the lyrics but I can think of many works that
I like or dislike because of the instrumental music (and couldn't care less
about the lyrics). 

Perhaps this is the problem I have with a lot of rap. Some rap actually
have some music in it, but most of it is simple crap in terms of music. I
couldn't really give a flying shit about Ice Cube mumbling about his
"bitch", his AK and about how productive his days are. I might give a damn
if he actually had some music. Again, the lyrics are unimportant. As it 
stands, Ice Cube and his NWA buddies will be lost in the sands of time
because there's little music in their works and their stories about their
bitches, their AKs and their cops are boring as hell.
power
response 59 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 04:53 UTC 1993

  Well, Jemmie, we have somewhat different approaches to music, then.  I
appreciate the musical aspects of a song, but I tend to enjoy (at least
'pop' music) more if the lyrics have some sort of weight to them.....
Which is something I find in hard-core rap, and some of the other stuff
that I like to listen to, and something that I don't find in the radio-rap
mainstream....
  And there is music there, anyway...  Not super complex, but then, a lot
of music we appreciate BECAUSE of its simplicity--like the classical
music you mention :)....  Rap has some tonal music to it, but tends to be
more rhythms'n'stuff... Rhythms isn't exactly what I mean, maybe--I don't
refer as much to the drum/whatever beat but to the rhythm of the voice...
  As for the subject matter of hard-core rap being boring, that is a matter
of perspective.  I find it somewhat interesting.  And apparently a lot of
the people who listen to it also find it somewhat interesting.  I don't
think that you can make a case that this music will not be listened to
in 20 years, just because you don't like it now--tastes obviously differ.
hawkeye
response 60 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 16:52 UTC 1993

I again state my point that it relates to the *music*, but I'd also like
to think that society will change in the next 20 years so that the 
*message* of rap will no longer be relavent -- hence the "novelty" aspect
only.
 
Also, certainly *poetry* has existed for 100s of years.  *GOOD* poetry, not
*all* poetry...

I could make the case that the "folk music" of the 1950's (the pre-rock era)
is no longer widely listened to.  "punk" of the 1970's is not either.  The
same will most likely happen with "rap" as well.  

Music ages because of the feelings it generates and "oldies" last not only
because of the "greatness" of the source material, but also because of
the emotions that they bring back.  

I will admit to my relative ignorance of *all* rap, but I have yet to
hear of a rap song that a couple considers "their song" or a rap song used
as a "class song" or homecoming theme or the like.  If they exist, I'd
like to be made aware of them...
rogue
response 61 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 18:11 UTC 1993

#59: Obviously the mass majority of people agree with me. The librettists 
     for the great classical composers are unknown except by the most
     dedicated and, to give a modern day example, no one knows (or cares)
     about who wrote the words for Phantom of the Opera and many people know
     Andrew Lloyd Webber wrote the music. Some people even know some of the
     people who played the parts (Michael Crawford, Sarah Brightman), but
     no one knows who wrote the words. What does that tell you, russ? Perhaps
     even more people know who the head caretaker for the London show was...

     Music is music. If you do not have the notes to please the ear, it
     doesn't matter what the lyrics are. It's as simple as that. Rap simply
     doesn't have the notes. Get a bass beat, some synthesizers and maybe
     a drum beat here and there and you have yourself a rap hit. Is that 
     music? 
tnt
response 62 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 21:56 UTC 1993

Jungle music.
power
response 63 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 00:44 UTC 1993

  Hawkeye:  I agree that folk music and punk don't have an incredible
comeback going, and rap could conceivably fall to the wayside in a similar
way.  However, I find it more likely that it'll stay around for a while.
I see no sign of the social issues that rap addresses (a predominantly
black underclass, the racism remaining in our society) going away.
  I wish I could remember some of the songs on the list for my school's
Prom theme (we don't really have a homecoming theme much)... but I'm sure
some of them were rap.  Not hard rap, admittedly... so not really a very
good argument.  A better argument would be, show me were, for example,
Black Sabbath had a song that was a homecoming theme or an 'our song'
type thing... I doubt there is such an instance... yet, *I* listen to them,
and I'm finding that more and more people have heard of them... (ok, maybe
partly thanks to Beavis and Butthead, but also due to the general rise of
grunge, which is quite similar to Black Sabbath and such music)....

  Jemmie:  The Phantom of the Opera isn't a very good comparison.  I'd
thought that Andrew Lloyd Weber had written the lyrics himself, but, in
any case, this is more of a focus than in rap.  In rap, who really cares
who created the tonal aspects--what you care about is the rhythm and the
words, which are the creation of the rapper.
  And music is in the ear of the beholder...  I think that it is obvious
that rap *IS* music, although you can (as you do) disagree with whether it
is music that you would want to listen to.

  I'm not swearing that any particular rap group will be known in 20 years,
but I *AM* saying that it will be around, to one extent or another....
Peter Paul and Mary are still around, and listened to somewhat by the'
younger generation, and while the Sex Pistols are gone, there's still a
bit of a following...  rap may be like this, or it may be something bigger,
where Fab Five Freddy gets the following that Jim Morrison has now...  One
simply can't say, from the perspective we have now....
  You guys seem to be making a fairly subjective argument, that, since
you, a particular person, don't like rap, that it must be a passing fad, and
that it will be dead soon.  This is similar to someone objecting to
heavy metal's chance of lasting because they don't like it.  And heavy
metal has already been around for 20 years or so......
hawkeye
response 64 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 16:13 UTC 1993

Not necessarily.  I *like* punk music, yet I can see that it is a "dead"
genre.  I *like* folk music, but it is also "dead".  

It all really *does* relate to the music, power.  You mention that none of
the "hard core" rap was in line for your prom theme.  That's *my* point.
the "lite" rap usually has some kind of musical undertone that the harder
stuff doesn't.  That's why "Ice Ice Baby" (a terrible song by *any*
standards) was a big "rap hit" -- because there was music (lifted from
Queen) underneath it.  If the song has a chorus (like "Whoomp!  There it is"
or "You down wit OPP") then it has a better chance of long term survival.
This is, again, the *musical* aspect.  This is what Heavy Metal has that
Rap doesn't.  Why does "Stairway to Heaven" excite new generations?  
Because of the lilting *melody*.
polygon
response 65 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 17:04 UTC 1993

I very strongly disagree with the contention that folk music is a "dead"
genre.  Life in the commercial fast lane is not the only kind of life for
a genre.  Who are all these people who troop into the Ark most every
night?
power
response 66 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 17:40 UTC 1993

  The hard core rap tends to have at least as much musicality to it as
something like Ic Ice Baby.. (which, unless I am mistaken, had "Under
Pressure" mixed with it later)....  Which still isn't all that much...
And hard rap has a chorus, too....  So.... where's the distinction?
shf
response 67 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 18:31 UTC 1993

don't tell nanci griffith folk is dead, or a thousand others. what 65 said.
chelsea
response 68 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 23:25 UTC 1993

Griffith isn't folk.  I prefer Michael Cooney's definition of folk --
it it's so old that nobody can remember who wrote it, then it's folk.
Now, I'm willing to stretch that a bit and include like Seger and
the Weavers and some of early Dylan but when you've got a backup
orchestra plugging in their electric keyboards and such...  It ain't folk.
chelsea
response 69 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 23:29 UTC 1993

Er, Seeger?
remmers
response 70 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 01:42 UTC 1993

Yes, Pete Seeger.  (There's also a Bob Seger, but that's a different cat
altogether.)
shf
response 71 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 10:24 UTC 1993

Nanci Griffith says she does folk, who am I to argue with her? She also says
she does country.
( cite: _Spin_,1/88:))
rogue
response 72 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 15:11 UTC 1993

#63: Of course rap will be around, to one extent of another. Short of
     total nuclear annhilation, Dr.Dre's works will still be somewhere and
     someone will still know he existed. 

     I didn't say that rap is not going to be around because I don't like it.
     I said that rap does not have the qualities of long-lasting music.
hawkeye
response 73 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 18:09 UTC 1993

For all those who got in a huff:  I define "folk" as The Weavers, Pete
Seeger, Kingston Trio, early Dylan, et al.  Yes, there is an *audience*,
but the genre has little impact on the Music In{{dustry.  That's
the point being made.
polygon
response 74 of 133: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 16:37 UTC 1993

Re 73.  That's a common but highly ignorant misconception.  I doubt even
any of the people you named would define "folk music" that way.  Their
material is only a tiny sub-sub-segment of the field.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-133     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss