|
Grex > Coop7 > #140: Does Grex need a new fair-witness for the Poetry conference? |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 88 responses total. |
rlawson
|
|
response 50 of 88:
|
Dec 28 16:04 UTC 1995 |
Yes, Jon... that's what I meant. <robert hangs his head in shame>
|
rlawson
|
|
response 51 of 88:
|
Dec 28 16:04 UTC 1995 |
Re #50: I meant John... <giggle>.
|
shade
|
|
response 52 of 88:
|
Dec 28 16:41 UTC 1995 |
Alright then, maybe we should all stop posting in this item? let's move the
fight to a poem (where it usually is)? I'm sure the coop people are bored.
|
remmers
|
|
response 53 of 88:
|
Dec 28 17:11 UTC 1995 |
There once was a poet named shade
Of whom everyone was afraid,
She made so much verse
That all others would curse
At the sheer volume thusly displayed.
|
brighn
|
|
response 54 of 88:
|
Dec 28 18:04 UTC 1995 |
Fight? What fight? Robert, were we having a fight?
And what's this about laughing about it later? I'm laughing about it
now.
And if the co-op people are bored, they of all people should know about
the Forget command... their silence implies to me that quite a few people
may have already employed it...
|
rlawson
|
|
response 55 of 88:
|
Dec 28 18:33 UTC 1995 |
I don't believe we were fighting. I, too, have a slight grin on my face. But
forgive and forget as they say, and to the Co-op readers, feel free to perform
the latter of the two! >8)
|
bubu
|
|
response 56 of 88:
|
Dec 28 22:48 UTC 1995 |
No boys go ahead and fight...makes for good entertainment....
|
rlawson
|
|
response 57 of 88:
|
Dec 28 23:28 UTC 1995 |
Why should we fight to humor you, dork!! >8)
----------
That was a joke, by the way. Dan is not a dork (well, maybe he is, but when
I call him a dork, it's in a very loving way). :)
|
srw
|
|
response 58 of 88:
|
Dec 29 06:11 UTC 1995 |
We haven't forgotten you. We're just lurking.
|
bubu
|
|
response 59 of 88:
|
Dec 29 20:57 UTC 1995 |
Oh so you're tryin to start a fight with me, Mr. I write the poems that make
the young girls cry?....
Tee-Hee
|
davel
|
|
response 60 of 88:
|
Dec 29 21:06 UTC 1995 |
Speaking as one of the cfadm types who's supposed to handle things like
changing FWs, etc.: I'm now completely bewildered. Can someone take time
off from drift long enough to say whether additional FWs are to be added
and who? That's assuming there's something of a consensus. If there's
not, I'd say peacefrg needs to make a decision, & probably someone should
bug him for it.
Thanks. We now return you to your regularly scheduled drift.
|
bubu
|
|
response 61 of 88:
|
Dec 29 21:22 UTC 1995 |
I belive peacefrg made an entry saying that yes he should step down. I also
believe that most of the people that frequent this cf (if not all of us) gave
our vote for Ms. Shade. I am under the impression that Ms. Kitty has agreed
to fullfill the position...
|
shade
|
|
response 62 of 88:
|
Dec 29 21:59 UTC 1995 |
Miss Opium has agreed if no one is going to get into a snit and stop
speaking to her over it. (a long lasting fear). But I believe we're
waiting for peacefrg to come say that's nice and ok. Or or someone
else to get sick of hearing about it (someone like popcorn or someone)
and change it.
(Nope, sorry bubu, I'm not married.)
|
rlawson
|
|
response 63 of 88:
|
Dec 29 22:30 UTC 1995 |
Re #59: You're just jealous because you can't make the young girls cry over
you!! :)
Re #60: You, as a cfadm type, have nothing to worry about because peacefrg
and popcorn are taking care of the arrangements. We are just waiting for
peacefrg to confirm. I sent more mail to peacefrg and his .forward file now
says peacefrg@nether.net and I got some sort of error message but I think he
received (or will receive) the letter.
Re #62: Dan was just trying to convey to davel what was going on here and,
IMHO, #61 is not a personal attack on you, Jenne. At ease, Miss Kitty! :)
|
shade
|
|
response 64 of 88:
|
Dec 30 03:27 UTC 1995 |
Robert, please keep our private conversations private.
|
rlawson
|
|
response 65 of 88:
|
Dec 30 03:38 UTC 1995 |
I wasn't aware it was a *private* conversation... and I read your response
and *figured* that was what you meant.
|
shade
|
|
response 66 of 88:
|
Dec 30 04:10 UTC 1995 |
Whatever.
|
rlawson
|
|
response 67 of 88:
|
Dec 30 04:45 UTC 1995 |
Sorry, Jenne love. Didn't mean to upset you. :(
|
popcorn
|
|
response 68 of 88:
|
Dec 30 05:06 UTC 1995 |
Re 63: If peacefrg and popcorn are taking care of it, this is the first I've
heard of it. However, it does sound like there's a consensus that shade
should replace peacefrg as the fair witness of the poetry conference.
|
shade
|
|
response 69 of 88:
|
Dec 30 05:09 UTC 1995 |
;} I think everyone is waiting for peacefrg to log on and
say "that]s nice" and hand over the ...well :}
|
rlawson
|
|
response 70 of 88:
|
Dec 30 05:22 UTC 1995 |
Re #68: I'm sorry, but James made it sound as if you and him were taking care
of the matter when he's written me e-mail. Sorry about the misunderstanding!
Then can we just get this thing over with then and made Jenne f-w?
|
brighn
|
|
response 71 of 88:
|
Dec 30 05:30 UTC 1995 |
Jenna, as FW? Who cam eup with that stupid idea?
Oh, wait, it was me...
Sorry...
*giggle*
|
rlawson
|
|
response 72 of 88:
|
Dec 30 05:52 UTC 1995 |
What!?!? You don't think Jenne'd make a good f-w?!?! Let's have it out,
brighn! Right now!
<giggle>
|
shade
|
|
response 73 of 88:
|
Dec 30 06:18 UTC 1995 |
***jenna hides under a rock*** there's nothing like this item to depress me.
|
brighn
|
|
response 74 of 88:
|
Dec 30 07:02 UTC 1995 |
Jenna, sweetheart, we're just playing.
|