You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-82       
 
Author Message
25 new of 82 responses total.
robh
response 50 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 00:04 UTC 1996

Re 48 - Knowing how wacky my Goddess is, you may well be right.
scg
response 51 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 01:09 UTC 1996

Rob pointed it out to me last night, and after looking at it again I was
wondering why I hadn't gotten it (I don't believe much of what's in the bible,
but if I want to read about sex and violence it is much better written than
most current works ;)  ).  Then again, I was expecting this to be either
technical or geographic, so it didn't occur to me.  I did go through the ASCII
values at one point trying to find a pattern of the numbers, but that
obviously didn't help.
janc
response 52 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 01:41 UTC 1996

Here's an easy one:

 ...9B 8B 7B 6B 5B 4B 3B 2B B HB F H 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H...

though the same sequence is sometimes written:

 ...9B 8B 7B 6B 5B 4B 3B 2B 1 2 2.5 3 4 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H...

scott
response 53 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 02:02 UTC 1996

Yeah, pencil hardness.
scg
response 54 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 02:37 UTC 1996

Still too low tech for me -- I was looking for something like hex. ;)
scott
response 55 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 02:44 UTC 1996

Actually, I was wondering if it might be pen width.  Seems a bit more esoteric
than I remember pencil ratings to be, even in drafting.
ajax
response 56 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 07:07 UTC 1996

  (For the younger set, in ancient times, drafting involved paper and
pencils, which were analog "click and drag"-style pointing devices, as
seen in historical television shows such as The Brady Bunch).
janc
response 57 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 07:25 UTC 1996

(any real engineer would recognize the pencils, especially the H's since
 they were mainly for draftsmen.  The B end of the sequence is probably still
 well known to artists.)
rcurl
response 58 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 08:37 UTC 1996

  T G C F A O Q T C D
davel
response 59 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 12:55 UTC 1996

Um, Rane, the entries aren't unique.  That's why remmers needed J2 etc.
davel
response 60 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 12:59 UTC 1996

Oh, and possibly she didn't recognize remmers's sequence because the
order was the standard Christian order, not the standard Jewish order?
(Though I have't looked back to John's original, shorter, posting to
make sure whether it went past the point of divergence.)
scg
response 61 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 13:20 UTC 1996

Where is the point of divergence?
gregc
response 62 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 14:19 UTC 1996

M I C K E Y M O U S E
steve
response 63 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 17:38 UTC 1996

  The second M and E aren't unique. ;-)
rcurl
response 64 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 00:02 UTC 1996

I thought someone might raise the uniqueness question. I will go
overboard, for the fun of it, and expand my list to:

TA, GY, CA, FL, AP, OR, QU, TO, CO, DI
gregc
response 65 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 13:55 UTC 1996

Some of those look like states, but not all.
Some look like Element designations, but not all. Besides, they would
have been written as "Ca", not "CA".
rcurl
response 66 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 19:32 UTC 1996

Looks like I can venture a hint: the sequence corresponds to a related
strict ordinal series.
popcorn
response 67 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 22:38 UTC 1996

(Valerie didn't recognize books of the bible because Valerie has been a
non-religious atheist for almost all of her life.)
gregc
response 68 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 23:07 UTC 1996

That's what I thought. I've been wondering why robh thought that
Valerie " of all people" should have been able to get that one.
robh
response 69 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 23:08 UTC 1996

Ah, but note that she said "almost"!

Okay, okay, my mistake...
popcorn
response 70 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 13:32 UTC 1996

Ok, make that "all of my life" or "ever since I was a tiny tot and realized
that Santa didn't exist".
robh
response 71 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 22:10 UTC 1996

Santa doesn't exist?
adbarr
response 72 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 22:14 UTC 1996

I belive in Santa Claus. And gregc and srw can prove this with a simple
mathematical process. Viz ...
srw
response 73 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 01:19 UTC 1996

I'm sure Greg would look a lot better in that suit and beard than I would.
sidhe
response 74 of 82: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 01:23 UTC 1996

        Why did I think anyone would take the problem, small though it is,
seriously? This seems to be beyond what I should expect.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-82       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss