|
Grex > Coop13 > #370: Nominations for the 2007 Grex Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 236 responses total. |
tod
|
|
response 50 of 236:
| 
Nov 15 19:09 UTC 2006 |
re #48 and 49
I think these members would be good on the board, so I hearby nominate
them:
jep
jared
eskarina
other
srw
I think it is odd to nominate people who don't participate in this conference.
Jared is the only participant and he hasn't been here since July....
See below:
Respond, pass, forget, quit, or ? for more options? part jep
User jep not a member
Respond, pass, forget, quit, or ? for more options? part eskarina
User eskarina not a member
Respond, pass, forget, quit, or ? for more options? part other
User other not a member
Respond, pass, forget, quit, or ? for more options? part srw
User srw not a member
Respond, pass, forget, quit, or ? for more options? part jared
jared Wed Jul 26 19:51:22 2006 Jared Mauch
|
jep
|
|
response 51 of 236:
|
Nov 15 20:21 UTC 2006 |
Heh. I participate in the conference but only via Backtalk.
I decline the nomination but I appreciate the thought, remmers!
|
keesan
|
|
response 52 of 236:
|
Nov 15 20:27 UTC 2006 |
user keesan not a member. As far as I know I am a paid-up member and my
outgoing ssh still works.
|
keesan
|
|
response 53 of 236:
|
Nov 15 20:28 UTC 2006 |
user remmers not a member
|
kingjon
|
|
response 54 of 236:
|
Nov 15 20:35 UTC 2006 |
The current list of members of Grex, to which I referred when making my
nominations, may be accessed by running the UNIX commands "member" or "members"
("member" pipes through a pager, while "members" is suitable for piping through
grep, say). The BBS command "part" only shows which users have posted in this
conference -- not a reliable indicator of membership, since some members may
not read coop, and we allow anyone to post here regardless of membership.
|
keesan
|
|
response 55 of 236:
|
Nov 15 22:07 UTC 2006 |
So why does 'part' say that keesan and remmers are not members?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 56 of 236:
|
Nov 16 00:54 UTC 2006 |
No idea:
} Ok: part keesan
}
} loginid last time on name
}
} keesan Wed Nov 15 17:12:30 2006 Sindi Keesan
}
} 1 participant total.
}
} Ok:
|
kingjon
|
|
response 57 of 236:
|
Nov 16 02:17 UTC 2006 |
#55: As I say in #54, the "part" command -- built into Picospan, mind -- tells
you about "participants" in a conference, i.e. those who have posted responses.
|
steve
|
|
response 58 of 236:
|
Nov 16 03:18 UTC 2006 |
I accept the nomination to run for the board.
I nominate Glenda Andre'.
|
steve
|
|
response 59 of 236:
|
Nov 16 03:21 UTC 2006 |
I nominate Marcus Watts.
|
mdw
|
|
response 60 of 236:
|
Nov 16 03:34 UTC 2006 |
I accept.
|
glenda
|
|
response 61 of 236:
|
Nov 16 04:11 UTC 2006 |
I accept.
|
keesan
|
|
response 62 of 236:
|
Nov 16 04:52 UTC 2006 |
I second the last two nominations. Don't you need to be seconded before you
can accept?
|
tod
|
|
response 63 of 236:
|
Nov 16 06:40 UTC 2006 |
i nominate keesan and kingjon
|
nharmon
|
|
response 64 of 236:
|
Nov 16 13:56 UTC 2006 |
I nominate Dick Devos.
|
keesan
|
|
response 65 of 236:
|
Nov 16 16:11 UTC 2006 |
It is too late to nominate us and besides we were both already nominated and
declined. Or maybe your 1:40 posting reflects Ann Arbor and not your local
time. Thanks anyway. My seconding was 8 minutes before the deadline.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 66 of 236:
|
Nov 16 16:31 UTC 2006 |
I nominate John Kerry.
|
jep
|
|
response 67 of 236:
|
Nov 16 19:57 UTC 2006 |
You don't need to be nominated or seconded to run for the Board of
Cyberspace. You merely need to indicate you are willing to run.
|
tod
|
|
response 68 of 236:
|
Nov 16 21:52 UTC 2006 |
re #64
I'm in Seattle so yea..I posted it 3 hours previous to the timestamp.
|
other
|
|
response 69 of 236:
|
Nov 17 06:41 UTC 2006 |
I'm surprised I don't show up as a participant, but that may be because
I only use the web interface for conferencing. In any case, I
appreciate the nomination, but I'm inclined to decline.
|
spooked
|
|
response 70 of 236:
|
Nov 17 11:08 UTC 2006 |
The part command is not working correctly.
|
spooked
|
|
response 71 of 236:
|
Nov 17 11:09 UTC 2006 |
e.g. I'm not a participant (still).
|
naftee
|
|
response 72 of 236:
|
Nov 18 00:47 UTC 2006 |
i nominate nate harmon
|
nharmon
|
|
response 73 of 236:
|
Nov 18 14:45 UTC 2006 |
Thanks Brett, but I have already declined.
|
i
|
|
response 74 of 236:
|
Nov 19 04:42 UTC 2006 |
Re: #40,
Thank you, but i'm afraid that i've already got more commitments than i
can pay proper attention to, and so must decline.
|