You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-115      
 
Author Message
25 new of 115 responses total.
slynne
response 50 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 04:12 UTC 2005

No, I didnt discuss it with him. I would be surprised, but pleasantly
so, if he accepted. 

Although I disagree with him on a lot of things, I think cyklone would
probably do a good job and I nominate him although I doubt he'll accept. 

scholar
response 51 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 06:37 UTC 2005

 :/
naftee
response 52 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 07:00 UTC 2005

 :\
nharmon
response 53 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 13:39 UTC 2005

:|
remmers
response 54 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 13:57 UTC 2005

Re #41:  I think the bylaws require 4 ballot slots one year, 3 the next.  
So if we merge the vacancy-filling election with the regular one, some 
scheme (such as lowest vote-getter, or drawing lots) would be needed.

Now that I think of it, holding a special election for the vacancy, 
separate from the regular one, might be the cleanest way to go.  That 
way, there'd be no ambiguity about what a candidate was running for.  
The bylaws require that an election to fill a vacancy be held within 
three months of the occurrence of the vacancy.  We could hold the 
regular election, with four slots, on schedule and the special election 
anytime before early February.

The downside of that would be a longer period of time with a reduced-
size Board.

The Board should decide how to handle this.
cyklone
response 55 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 14:39 UTC 2005

This is me not accepting
Thanks for the the thought though.
aruba
response 56 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 16:50 UTC 2005

I'd rather do it in one election, as Mary suggests in #41, so that we have
7 board members as soon as possible.  But I suppose that's not 100%
consistent with the bylaws.
keesan
response 57 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 17:58 UTC 2005

Could one of the outgoing members stick around until February?  If more than
one of them were willing, have the voters choose one for the short-term
position?
dpc
response 58 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 22:07 UTC 2005

Whatever we do has to be 100% consistent with the bylaws.  We don't 
want to give anyone a reason for challenging an election.
tod
response 59 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 22:52 UTC 2005

I rescind my acceptance of the nomination.
naftee
response 60 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 01:46 UTC 2005

what ! 
that's a big word.
you're not running anymore, tod ?!
 :(
i
response 61 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 11:41 UTC 2005

Re: #46
Thank you, but i've already said "yes" to a bit more board
work than i can do a really good job at.
remmers
response 62 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 11:43 UTC 2005

At its meeting last night, the board decided to hold a separate
election to fill the vacancy after the regular electionn.  Probably in
January.
mary
response 63 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 01:43 UTC 2005

The nominations were due to close on the 15th, but Grex was offline
between the 12th and the 19th.  The board is exchanging mail in 
regards to how this should be handled.  I've asked for the board 
to vote, in mail, to allow the nominating period to remain open
for an extra week to compensate for this downtime.  There seems
to be a question about whether the bylaws address this specific
situation.

Anyhow, this question needs to be resolved fairly quickly to be 
helpful.  If anyone has any comments or concerns about the propriety
of such an extension, please let us know.
scholar
response 64 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 01:59 UTC 2005

I would like to know what Mary Remmers and the candidates think about death
threats on Grex.
naftee
response 65 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 04:34 UTC 2005

Yeah; what scholar said.  
nharmon
response 66 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 04:45 UTC 2005

I fully support the free speech rights of all users to express their
utter disappreciation for the harm that scholar and naftee have
inflicted upon Grex. And while I would normally consider it rude to make
users feel threatened and or not welcome on the system, I believe that
in this case scholar and naftee have brought that onto themselves.

With great humility and appreciation to those who have nominated me, I
must respectfully decline. This decision has nothing to do with any
current events, but rather due to my current commitments.
scholar
response 67 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 05:36 UTC 2005

Hey, baby, this is Grex.
other
response 68 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 22:08 UTC 2005

I'm all in favor of death threats on Grex, but ONLY if they are
"credible and specific."

(Or is it "specific and credible?"  I can't remember.)

tod
response 69 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 07:53 UTC 2005

Please don't forget that I withdrew my nomination acceptance.
remmers
response 70 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 22 16:10 UTC 2005

Okay, I *think* it's okay to extend nominations by three days, the
amount of time remaining in the nomination period when Grex went
down for the OS upgrade.  I believe the bylaw language on election
extensions allows this.  So I hereby declare that nominations are open 
now through November 25.

The board election will take place December 1-15.  There are nominees 
who have not yet definitely accepted.  They have until midnight November 
30 to accept, and should do so by indicating acceptance in this item.  
To appear on the ballot, one must also be a member in good standing who 
has paid at least three months' dues.

I'll post a summary of the nominations and acceptances in a day
or two.
other
response 71 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 22 16:49 UTC 2005

I appreciate the nomination, and I respectfully decline.
twenex
response 72 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 22 22:41 UTC 2005

Ditto.
remmers
response 73 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 19:16 UTC 2005

Okay, nominations are closed.

Nominees who have accepted are:  slynne, bhoward, polygon, aruba.

Scanning the item, I think granger, naftee, and remmers were nominated
and have not accepted or declined.  Let me know if I missed anybody.
Such people have through Nov. 30 to accept and to become members in good
standing if they aren't already.

Re my own nomination:  I appreciate the thought but will decline.

At this point, there are four nominees who accepted, which equals the
number of board vacancies.

Recall that there will be a special election early next year (the board
needs to set the dates) to fill the vacancy created by Steve VanLoon's
resignation.
naftee
response 74 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 28 07:13 UTC 2005

I'm not a member; I can't seem to run.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-115      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss