|
Grex > Coop13 > #25: Nominations for the 2004 Grex Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 225 responses total. |
jp2
|
|
response 50 of 225:
| 
Oct 21 23:52 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mary
|
|
response 51 of 225:
|
Oct 22 00:27 UTC 2003 |
Yeah, slynne! Too cool.
|
remmers
|
|
response 52 of 225:
|
Oct 22 00:47 UTC 2003 |
Re #50: I took your statement of intent as a self-nomination. Of
course, it doesn't matter.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 53 of 225:
|
Oct 22 16:18 UTC 2003 |
I've decided to accept the nomination. Don't worry, it's not the
headache talking...
|
aruba
|
|
response 54 of 225:
|
Oct 22 16:51 UTC 2003 |
Great!
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 55 of 225:
|
Oct 22 17:57 UTC 2003 |
About the headache not talking, or about the nomination? ;)
|
flem
|
|
response 56 of 225:
|
Oct 22 18:02 UTC 2003 |
If your headache can speak and post in conferences, you should probably lie
down or something. :)
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 57 of 225:
|
Oct 22 18:18 UTC 2003 |
*bats at the purple pixies around her head*
|
other
|
|
response 58 of 225:
|
Oct 22 19:26 UTC 2003 |
Well, that right there qualifies you for the Grex board! (#57)
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 59 of 225:
|
Oct 22 19:59 UTC 2003 |
resp:57 sat on my browser for ten minutes or so, because I forgot to hit
the post button.
|
kip
|
|
response 60 of 225:
|
Oct 23 01:20 UTC 2003 |
I accept Mary's nomination of me, as long as she starts to spell my last name
correctly. :)
Actually I'll accept regardless. Thanks for the faith Mary.
|
jlamb
|
|
response 61 of 225:
|
Oct 23 03:09 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
keesan
|
|
response 62 of 225:
|
Oct 23 03:36 UTC 2003 |
Would mynxcat like to be a board member? If so, I nominate her.
|
mary
|
|
response 63 of 225:
|
Oct 23 12:05 UTC 2003 |
Ack, sorry about that. But I'm thrilled about the rest.
Thanks.
|
remmers
|
|
response 64 of 225:
|
Oct 23 13:29 UTC 2003 |
Here's the current list of nominees who haven't declined. A * means
that they accepted. For purposes of this list, a "nominee" is anybody
who's been mentioned as a desirable candidate, including self-mentions.
Since self-nominations are allowed and only people who accept will
appear on the ballot, finer distinctions seem pointless to me. The
idea is to make it as easy as possible for folks to run for the board.
cmcgee
* jp2
* kip
glenda
* mary
tod
polygon
* slynne
* bhelliom
krj
mynxcat
The number of candidates now exceeds the number of open slots, so this
will definitely be a competitive election.
|
davel
|
|
response 65 of 225:
|
Oct 23 15:01 UTC 2003 |
Re 57: Do you have the rightful possession of the grexbat? Otherwise that's
not allowed.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 66 of 225:
|
Oct 23 15:41 UTC 2003 |
How about a trial of arms to whittle down the contestants? :p
|
jp2
|
|
response 67 of 225:
|
Oct 23 16:07 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 68 of 225:
|
Oct 23 17:08 UTC 2003 |
Nah. The idea behind elections is that they're peaceful substitutes
for such barbaric decision-making procedures.
But you knew that.
|
asddsa
|
|
response 69 of 225:
|
Oct 24 01:14 UTC 2003 |
re 61 But was it worth it?
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 70 of 225:
|
Oct 24 16:00 UTC 2003 |
Remmers takes the fun out of elections. No violence, no graft... *whines*
|
flem
|
|
response 71 of 225:
|
Oct 24 18:38 UTC 2003 |
Can I vote for the purple pixies?
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 72 of 225:
|
Oct 24 18:49 UTC 2003 |
Thanks for the nomination keesan. However, I will have to decline. I
have too much scheduled to happen next year, and don't feel I could do
the board justice at this point. However, I would consider running
next year.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 73 of 225:
|
Oct 24 18:49 UTC 2003 |
Only if they accept the nomination.
|
remmers
|
|
response 74 of 225:
|
Oct 24 20:04 UTC 2003 |
...And pay their dues.
|