|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 221 responses total. |
krj
|
|
response 50 of 221:
|
Jun 15 19:14 UTC 1997 |
I need to find the dates for the BUTTERFLY being sung in English
in Adrian, Michigan, this summer. Argh.
|
jiffer
|
|
response 51 of 221:
|
Jun 16 16:49 UTC 1997 |
wow! neat! that is only an hour away as well! Good luck ken!
|
arabella
|
|
response 52 of 221:
|
Jul 1 07:55 UTC 1997 |
Re #48: Do you mean Jane Eaglen? She is a Wagnerian soprano who
appeared at the gala for the Detroit Opera House in April of 1996
(for which I was a member of the chorus). I think I might be
interested in getting her CD.
Re Puccini in Adrian: Performances are in late September, according
to my accompanist, who is also chorus master for that production.
|
jiffer
|
|
response 53 of 221:
|
Jul 1 21:57 UTC 1997 |
That is the gal! Sorry on the mess up of her name.
Hmmmmm... sounds interesting, and i might be able to afford that... and its
not too far away! I miss cheap concerts....
|
krj
|
|
response 54 of 221:
|
Aug 15 19:38 UTC 1997 |
Opera Lenawee is performing Puccini's MADAME BUTTERFLY, September 19
through September 27. SUNG IN ENGLISH!! Performances are at the
Crosswell Opera House in Adrian, Michigan.
Tickets 517-264-3121. Webpage: http://www.aso.org/
|
krj
|
|
response 55 of 221:
|
Aug 15 19:40 UTC 1997 |
I forgot to mention: most tickets are $20. Thursday, Sept. 25 is a
discount show, tickets $10.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 56 of 221:
|
Aug 16 20:10 UTC 1997 |
You know, I'm not by any stretch an opera purist but I've concluded
(admittedly after only one or two performances) that I don't like
opera performed in English. I'm still almost totally unable to
comprehend the lyrics and the performances I've been to in English
have omitted supertitles (because after all, it's in English and we
all understand English, right? arrgghh..)
Anyway, it's ironic but true -- I've had much better luck following
operas that are sung in Italian or French thanks to the projected
supertitles..
|
srw
|
|
response 57 of 221:
|
Aug 30 06:24 UTC 1997 |
Me too, I'd much rather have supertitles than have it sung in English.
However, it is impressive just to consider that they are staging this
work in any language. I just checked out the ASO and Opera Lenawee
sites. I'll admit, I did not know that they ever tackled anything on
this scale. I'm impressed. I obviously didn't know very much about these
musical organizations.
|
krj
|
|
response 58 of 221:
|
Aug 31 01:30 UTC 1997 |
Leslie and I only became aware of Opera Lenawee because Leslie's
accompanist works with their chorus. We saw t their production
of Britten's comic opera Albert Herring in spring '96, and we
enjoyed it. Part of the compaany's appeal is their cozy little
opera house, which only seats around 600. I would say, gear one's
expectations to about the level of a UM student opera production.
I certainly understand where mcnally & srw are coming from regarding
opera in English. I have a bit of a fetish for opera in English, as
I think I've written before; I believe it has the potential to be
much more emotionally involving. But a lot of my excitement is
that productions in English are pretty rare; I don't think I have
seen any, other than at the UMich School of Music.
The world's chief advocate of opera in English is the English
National Opera (ENO). Unfortunately, our 1995 London visit was
mis-timed, and we missed the opening of their season by one week.
The ENO is the only company which records opera in English.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 59 of 221:
|
Aug 31 13:29 UTC 1997 |
Are we talking translated versions of foreign operas, or operas written in
english, or what?
|
krj
|
|
response 60 of 221:
|
Aug 31 16:40 UTC 1997 |
Operas in foreign languages translated into English, for t the most part.
In the case of Puccini's MADAME BUTTERFLY, the original language of
the book is Italian.
Of course some people would argue that English is a difficult language
to understand when sung... I *have* seen references, mostly on TV,
to operas in English with English titles. I think THE ASPERN PAPERS
was presented this way.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 61 of 221:
|
Aug 31 23:22 UTC 1997 |
Certainly English has more vowel shades than some languages. The difference
between Hell, Heal, Hall, and Hull is fainter than the analagous difference
in, say, Italian.
|
srw
|
|
response 62 of 221:
|
Sep 4 05:29 UTC 1997 |
or nearly any other language.
|
krj
|
|
response 63 of 221:
|
Sep 10 21:30 UTC 1997 |
If I am remembering the radio ad from WQRS correctly: the fall season
for the Michigan Opera Theatre opens on Saturday September 20, with
Verdi's AIDA. WQRS will be broadcasting the performance live.
The other opera on MOT's fall schedule is THE MAGIC FLUTE. For this
Mozart opera, MOT is bringing back the charming sets of Maurice Sendak.
|
srw
|
|
response 64 of 221:
|
Sep 12 01:53 UTC 1997 |
Just seeing those sets would be interesting enough by itself.
|
jiffer
|
|
response 65 of 221:
|
Sep 13 00:21 UTC 1997 |
I wanna go! i wanna go! (jiffer nmeeds to scramble to save moeney for the
opera!)
|
srw
|
|
response 66 of 221:
|
Sep 16 19:17 UTC 1997 |
I saw an airplane ad for the performance. The plane was circling the U-M
stadium during the Colorado game.
|
senna
|
|
response 67 of 221:
|
Sep 17 03:47 UTC 1997 |
I missed that add. I actually managed to avoid paying attention to the
planes, which I've been known to be distracted by before. The Clearpath
banner was huge.. it looked like the plane carying it could barely stay aloft
|
mcnally
|
|
response 68 of 221:
|
Sep 24 15:02 UTC 1997 |
re #63: The Sendak sets would be interesting but I really didn't
care for The Magic Flute..
I saw Opera Grand Rapids' peformance of Aida this Saturday. It was,
well, interesting.. To celebrate their 30th anniversary OGR decided
to stage a massive performance in Van Andel Arena (a >30,000 seat
sports stadium) instead of thei usual venue of De Vos Hall (notice a
theme in the names of GR entertainment facilities? bleccchh!)
The production was fairly lavish (to be charitable.. excessive and
gimmicky if you're feeling unkind -- for instance in the scene where
Radames returns in triumph from conquering the army of Aida's father
there were live horses, elephants, and camels in the triumphal procession.)
The costumes and sets were very cool but I myself wasn't bowled over by
the vocal performances (which may have been partly due to the fact that
we wound up with a substitute Aida but the fact that we were listening
to the performances over a sound system in an arena not designed for
concert acoustics and filled with > 20,000 other people probably
contributed to my dissatisfaction.)
Anyway, it shouldn't come as a surprise that opera works much better in a
concert hall than it does in a sports arena and despite the fairly lavish
production values I think that just about all of the other OGR productions
I've attended have been more enjoyable (for one thing if I wanted to listen
to the performers over an amplified sound system and watch them on a giant
projection screen a couple hundred feet away I could simulate this experience
at home much more affordably by watching the Met on TV..) Bottom line,
I guess, is that this was mostly a successful publicity ploy that attracted
many people who would normally never go to an opera but it didn't hold much
appeal for the regular opera-goer. I suspect I'll find their other
productions this season, Salome and Faust, more to my liking.
|
srw
|
|
response 69 of 221:
|
Sep 27 01:01 UTC 1997 |
Wow. That's amazing. Opera in a hockey arena! I'm not surprised at your
reaction.
|
davel
|
|
response 70 of 221:
|
Sep 27 01:41 UTC 1997 |
I heard a review of this production (on WUOM) yesterday (I think it was).
The reviewer basically viewed it as a creative attempt to (1) make opera a
paying proposition, & (2) bring in an audience not especially given to
attending opera, & found it generally successful (& worth imitating) in those
terms. I think he found it moderately successful artistically, too, though
that was a bit less clear.
|
jiffer
|
|
response 71 of 221:
|
Sep 27 09:47 UTC 1997 |
i don't like it.. not one bit.. i rath erlike ot see (*see*) the production
and not just hear it... what a shame...
|
davel
|
|
response 72 of 221:
|
Sep 27 12:38 UTC 1997 |
Personally, I rarely attend opera because the hearing is what I really care
about, & I can do that better & cheaper from home. But I thought that what
Mike objected to was that this production was done with seeing in the
forefront, so to speak.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 73 of 221:
|
Sep 27 15:41 UTC 1997 |
There wasn't anything particularly wrong with this production as an
entertainment event, it just lacked several features I normally
associate with an opera performance. By many measures it was a
spectacular success and if it manages to get people who would ordinarily
never come to attend and enjoy an opera then I won't begrudge Opera
Grand Rapids an occasional oddball stunt to help promote themselves.
I'd stip attending, though, if they made a habit of this -- somehow,
though, I don't see that being too likely. This was definitely a
special event..
|
arabella
|
|
response 74 of 221:
|
Sep 29 07:05 UTC 1997 |
Re #68: Have you seen Salome before, Mike? Ken and I saw it for
the first time at the MOT a year and a half ago, and it is a very
creepy opera. (Well, it's a very creepy story...)
|