You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-81       
 
Author Message
25 new of 81 responses total.
pvn
response 50 of 81: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 05:56 UTC 2003

(I believe Texas can also remain and split itself up into four new
States if I am not mistaken.)
sj2
response 51 of 81: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 11:23 UTC 2003

Re #48, Even if I accept that several thousand Iraqi soldiers were 
killed within the norms and international treaties, you've just 
answered to one of the many facts of US-Iraq issue. Maybe you didn't 
read the others.

Regarding RUPE's report - You're questioning their conclusions which 
is fine by me. Try explaining the facts they've put in the report. Or 
try explaining the facts posted in the other links.

You can assume whatever you feel like, doesn't matter to me.

"Btw- fewer people died in that attack than material, though the media 
decided to portray it as a bloodbath." - Would you support that with 
facts please?

"I suppose if ....... that you do." - At best, its speculation. 


cross
response 52 of 81: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 17:25 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 53 of 81: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 19:04 UTC 2003

How do you know he's not already doing that?  Such efforts would
probably not be visible on Grex.
cross
response 54 of 81: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 21:12 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 55 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 00:59 UTC 2003

I don't see any reasons at all why a person from country A, which may have
a nest of problems of its own, shouldn't be free to criticize the problems
of country B without being taken to task for doing so. If the subject of
the discussion is the problems of country B, the discussion should stick
to the subject, and attempts to divert the discussion to irrelevances
concerning country A should be ignored.

cross
response 56 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 03:48 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 57 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 05:28 UTC 2003

Few of us can do anything to deal with anyone else's problems and it
isn't  easy to deal with our own. How  are you expecting anyone to  deal with
their country's problems? But there is no  harm in people opining and
suggesting solutions to anyone's problems and I don't think they have to
give equal time to everyone else's problems, or even those of their own
country. There is no hypocracy in this. 
cross
response 58 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 14:46 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

cmcgee
response 59 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 15:27 UTC 2003

"so any amount of opining is just letting off steam"  Is it really true that
you express no opinions about anything you are not actively trying to change?
And do you count expressing an opinion as an act of change?

Seems like a very narrow use of brain power.
cross
response 60 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 18:03 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 61 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 18:35 UTC 2003

So now it is just a problem with someone else's enthusiasm? Of course, you
never rail, do you? 
slynne
response 62 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 18:52 UTC 2003

Actually, I think it is sometimes easier to see problems in other 
countries because it is easier to have an objective view of another 
country. So, I think it is valuable for outsiders to point out what 
those problems are. I find out a lot about the USA from reading the 
foreign press. And while I *could* dismiss what they write because they 
also have problems in their own countries, it seems more helpful if I 
listen to them. 
micklpkl
response 63 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 2 14:40 UTC 2003

To clarify resp:42 and others - Texas would not be able to leave the Union,
only to form new states, not to exceed four in number, under the annexation
resolution.

http://www.tsl.state.tx.us/ref/abouttx/annexation/
mynxcat
response 64 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 3 16:59 UTC 2003

As regards living in the country and picking up on local media 
sentiment, I live in the US, and I see a definite increase in anti-US 
sentiment thanks to the policies of the present govt. My two cents 
worth. 
tod
response 65 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 3 17:13 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 66 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 3 18:55 UTC 2003

"Officials here [in Baghdad] say that some basic infrastructure severely
damaged during or since the war - as well as utilities neglected under
the old regime - is expected to remain unrepaired. These include
utilities, leaving many Iraqis with worse standards of living than they
had under Saddam Hussein." --
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0903/p01s03-woiq.html
tod
response 67 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 3 20:27 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

cross
response 68 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 3 23:36 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 69 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 4 02:55 UTC 2003

> Offer Saudi Arabia and other oil producing countries $10 a
> barrel for their oil. If they don't like it, we go some place
> else.

I sense a flaw in this plan...
drew
response 70 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 4 03:00 UTC 2003

Authorize and encourage the manufacture of nuclear powered cars. (Most of it
is old tech, from circa 1915 or so.) Fund research on hydrogen-boron fission
and neon-sodium cycle catalytic hydrogen fusion.
rcurl
response 71 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 4 05:30 UTC 2003

 I sense a flaw in this plan..too
mary
response 72 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 4 11:29 UTC 2003

This isn't clever enough to be Robin Williams.
Not even close.
gull
response 73 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 4 13:40 UTC 2003

Well, it might be *a* Robin Williams, but there's no way it's *the*
Robin Williams.
oval
response 74 of 81: Mark Unseen   Sep 4 15:11 UTC 2003

#4 is quite fascist.

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-81       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss